WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.400 --> 00:00:04.950 align:start position:0%
 
Jev,<00:00:00.960><c> Jev,</c><00:00:01.600><c> Jev.</c><00:00:02.399><c> Welcome</c><00:00:02.879><c> to</c><00:00:03.760><c> Jev</c><00:00:04.240><c> week</c><00:00:04.560><c> on</c>

00:00:04.950 --> 00:00:04.960 align:start position:0%
Jev, Jev, Jev. Welcome to Jev week on
 

00:00:04.960 --> 00:00:09.190 align:start position:0%
Jev, Jev, Jev. Welcome to Jev week on
how<00:00:05.440><c> I</c><00:00:05.839><c> AI.</c><00:00:07.040><c> We</c><00:00:07.359><c> have</c><00:00:07.600><c> seen</c><00:00:08.000><c> a</c><00:00:08.480><c> lot</c><00:00:08.720><c> of</c><00:00:08.960><c> new</c>

00:00:09.190 --> 00:00:09.200 align:start position:0%
how I AI. We have seen a lot of new
 

00:00:09.200 --> 00:00:13.509 align:start position:0%
how I AI. We have seen a lot of new
models<00:00:09.679><c> be</c><00:00:09.920><c> released</c><00:00:10.400><c> in</c><00:00:10.719><c> the</c><00:00:10.960><c> last</c><00:00:12.160><c> 5</c><00:00:12.559><c> days.</c>

00:00:13.509 --> 00:00:13.519 align:start position:0%
models be released in the last 5 days.
 

00:00:13.519 --> 00:00:17.990 align:start position:0%
models be released in the last 5 days.
We<00:00:13.759><c> saw</c><00:00:14.000><c> Opus</c><00:00:14.559><c> 55.</c><00:00:15.200><c> We</c><00:00:15.360><c> saw</c><00:00:15.679><c> GPT6</c><00:00:16.560><c> Soul,</c><00:00:17.119><c> GPT6</c>

00:00:17.990 --> 00:00:18.000 align:start position:0%
We saw Opus 55. We saw GPT6 Soul, GPT6
 

00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:21.029 align:start position:0%
We saw Opus 55. We saw GPT6 Soul, GPT6
Luna.<00:00:18.960><c> Muse</c><00:00:19.279><c> is</c><00:00:19.520><c> blowing</c><00:00:19.920><c> up</c><00:00:20.080><c> the</c><00:00:20.240><c> timeline.</c>

00:00:21.029 --> 00:00:21.039 align:start position:0%
Luna. Muse is blowing up the timeline.
 

00:00:21.039 --> 00:00:23.590 align:start position:0%
Luna. Muse is blowing up the timeline.
Everybody<00:00:21.439><c> still</c><00:00:21.760><c> loves</c><00:00:22.000><c> their</c><00:00:22.240><c> Grock</c><00:00:22.640><c> bots.</c>

00:00:23.590 --> 00:00:23.600 align:start position:0%
Everybody still loves their Grock bots.
 

00:00:23.600 --> 00:00:26.870 align:start position:0%
Everybody still loves their Grock bots.
And<00:00:23.840><c> yet</c><00:00:24.160><c> there</c><00:00:24.400><c> is</c><00:00:24.800><c> one</c><00:00:25.359><c> thing</c><00:00:26.160><c> that</c><00:00:26.480><c> I</c><00:00:26.720><c> want</c>

00:00:26.870 --> 00:00:26.880 align:start position:0%
And yet there is one thing that I want
 

00:00:26.880 --> 00:00:29.509 align:start position:0%
And yet there is one thing that I want
to<00:00:26.960><c> talk</c><00:00:27.119><c> about</c><00:00:27.359><c> in</c><00:00:27.680><c> AI</c><00:00:28.080><c> right</c><00:00:28.240><c> now</c><00:00:28.960><c> and</c><00:00:29.199><c> that</c>

00:00:29.509 --> 00:00:29.519 align:start position:0%
to talk about in AI right now and that
 

00:00:29.519 --> 00:00:35.910 align:start position:0%
to talk about in AI right now and that
is<00:00:30.480><c> this</c><00:00:31.039><c> fast</c><00:00:32.399><c> cheap</c><00:00:33.840><c> doesn't</c><00:00:34.239><c> speak</c><00:00:35.360><c> system</c>

00:00:35.910 --> 00:00:35.920 align:start position:0%
is this fast cheap doesn't speak system
 

00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:41.110 align:start position:0%
is this fast cheap doesn't speak system
one<00:00:37.040><c> decision</c><00:00:37.520><c> model</c><00:00:38.160><c> from</c><00:00:38.719><c> Typesafe</c><00:00:39.520><c> AI.</c><00:00:40.800><c> As</c>

00:00:41.110 --> 00:00:41.120 align:start position:0%
one decision model from Typesafe AI. As
 

00:00:41.120 --> 00:00:44.150 align:start position:0%
one decision model from Typesafe AI. As
soon<00:00:41.280><c> as</c><00:00:41.440><c> I</c><00:00:41.600><c> saw</c><00:00:41.840><c> this</c><00:00:42.079><c> trending</c><00:00:43.200><c> on</c><00:00:43.520><c> X,</c><00:00:43.920><c> as</c>

00:00:44.150 --> 00:00:44.160 align:start position:0%
soon as I saw this trending on X, as
 

00:00:44.160 --> 00:00:47.350 align:start position:0%
soon as I saw this trending on X, as
soon<00:00:44.320><c> as</c><00:00:44.399><c> I</c><00:00:44.559><c> saw</c><00:00:44.719><c> it</c><00:00:44.960><c> launched,</c><00:00:46.079><c> I</c><00:00:46.559><c> immediately</c>

00:00:47.350 --> 00:00:47.360 align:start position:0%
soon as I saw it launched, I immediately
 

00:00:47.360 --> 00:00:49.510 align:start position:0%
soon as I saw it launched, I immediately
started<00:00:47.840><c> testing</c><00:00:48.239><c> it.</c><00:00:48.480><c> Now,</c><00:00:48.800><c> what</c><00:00:48.960><c> I</c><00:00:49.120><c> will</c><00:00:49.280><c> say</c>

00:00:49.510 --> 00:00:49.520 align:start position:0%
started testing it. Now, what I will say
 

00:00:49.520 --> 00:00:51.670 align:start position:0%
started testing it. Now, what I will say
is<00:00:50.239><c> more</c><00:00:50.480><c> than</c><00:00:50.640><c> any</c><00:00:50.879><c> other</c><00:00:51.120><c> model</c><00:00:51.440><c> I've</c>

00:00:51.670 --> 00:00:51.680 align:start position:0%
is more than any other model I've
 

00:00:51.680 --> 00:00:54.069 align:start position:0%
is more than any other model I've
experienced<00:00:52.160><c> lately,</c><00:00:52.960><c> Jev</c><00:00:53.440><c> has</c><00:00:53.600><c> been</c><00:00:53.760><c> the</c><00:00:53.920><c> one</c>

00:00:54.069 --> 00:00:54.079 align:start position:0%
experienced lately, Jev has been the one
 

00:00:54.079 --> 00:00:56.310 align:start position:0%
experienced lately, Jev has been the one
that<00:00:54.320><c> has</c><00:00:54.800><c> exploded</c>

00:00:56.310 --> 00:00:56.320 align:start position:0%
that has exploded
 

00:00:56.320 --> 00:00:58.630 align:start position:0%
that has exploded
use<00:00:56.640><c> cases,</c><00:00:57.360><c> personal</c><00:00:57.840><c> productivity</c><00:00:58.399><c> use</c>

00:00:58.630 --> 00:00:58.640 align:start position:0%
use cases, personal productivity use
 

00:00:58.640 --> 00:01:01.750 align:start position:0%
use cases, personal productivity use
cases,<00:00:59.600><c> code</c><00:00:59.920><c> use</c><00:01:00.160><c> cases,</c><00:01:01.120><c> product</c><00:01:01.520><c> use</c>

00:01:01.750 --> 00:01:01.760 align:start position:0%
cases, code use cases, product use
 

00:01:01.760 --> 00:01:03.750 align:start position:0%
cases, code use cases, product use
cases.<00:01:02.559><c> Today</c><00:01:02.879><c> I'm</c><00:01:03.120><c> going</c><00:01:03.199><c> to</c><00:01:03.280><c> give</c><00:01:03.359><c> you</c><00:01:03.520><c> a</c>

00:01:03.750 --> 00:01:03.760 align:start position:0%
cases. Today I'm going to give you a
 

00:01:03.760 --> 00:01:06.310 align:start position:0%
cases. Today I'm going to give you a
very<00:01:04.080><c> quick</c><00:01:04.320><c> whirlwind</c><00:01:04.879><c> tour</c><00:01:05.119><c> of</c><00:01:05.600><c> what</c><00:01:05.920><c> Jeb</c>

00:01:06.310 --> 00:01:06.320 align:start position:0%
very quick whirlwind tour of what Jeb
 

00:01:06.320 --> 00:01:08.630 align:start position:0%
very quick whirlwind tour of what Jeb
is,<00:01:07.040><c> what</c><00:01:07.280><c> it</c><00:01:07.439><c> will</c><00:01:07.520><c> give</c><00:01:07.680><c> you</c><00:01:07.840><c> back</c><00:01:08.159><c> and</c><00:01:08.400><c> what</c>

00:01:08.630 --> 00:01:08.640 align:start position:0%
is, what it will give you back and what
 

00:01:08.640 --> 00:01:11.990 align:start position:0%
is, what it will give you back and what
it<00:01:08.799><c> won't,</c><00:01:09.760><c> and</c><00:01:10.000><c> then</c><00:01:10.560><c> how</c><00:01:10.880><c> I</c><00:01:11.200><c> have</c><00:01:11.360><c> used</c><00:01:11.600><c> it</c>

00:01:11.990 --> 00:01:12.000 align:start position:0%
it won't, and then how I have used it
 

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:14.789 align:start position:0%
it won't, and then how I have used it
over<00:01:12.240><c> the</c><00:01:12.479><c> last</c><00:01:13.119><c> week</c><00:01:13.520><c> to</c><00:01:13.760><c> do</c><00:01:14.000><c> work</c><00:01:14.240><c> that</c><00:01:14.479><c> I</c>

00:01:14.789 --> 00:01:14.799 align:start position:0%
over the last week to do work that I
 

00:01:14.799 --> 00:01:17.350 align:start position:0%
over the last week to do work that I
think<00:01:14.960><c> is</c><00:01:15.200><c> worth</c><00:01:15.920><c> hundreds</c><00:01:16.400><c> of</c><00:01:16.560><c> thousands</c><00:01:17.119><c> if</c>

00:01:17.350 --> 00:01:17.360 align:start position:0%
think is worth hundreds of thousands if
 

00:01:17.360 --> 00:01:20.230 align:start position:0%
think is worth hundreds of thousands if
not<00:01:17.759><c> millions</c><00:01:18.400><c> of</c><00:01:18.720><c> dollars.</c><00:01:19.360><c> And</c><00:01:19.680><c> I</c><00:01:20.000><c> have</c>

00:01:20.230 --> 00:01:20.240 align:start position:0%
not millions of dollars. And I have
 

00:01:20.240 --> 00:01:24.789 align:start position:0%
not millions of dollars. And I have
probably<00:01:20.720><c> spent</c><00:01:21.759><c> sub</c><00:01:22.320><c> $10</c><00:01:22.960><c> on</c><00:01:23.280><c> Jev</c><00:01:23.680><c> tokens.</c><00:01:24.560><c> A</c>

00:01:24.789 --> 00:01:24.799 align:start position:0%
probably spent sub $10 on Jev tokens. A
 

00:01:24.799 --> 00:01:26.310 align:start position:0%
probably spent sub $10 on Jev tokens. A
lot<00:01:24.880><c> of</c><00:01:24.960><c> it</c><00:01:25.119><c> has</c><00:01:25.280><c> been</c><00:01:25.439><c> subsidized</c><00:01:26.000><c> because</c>

00:01:26.310 --> 00:01:26.320 align:start position:0%
lot of it has been subsidized because
 

00:01:26.320 --> 00:01:28.789 align:start position:0%
lot of it has been subsidized because
Jeb<00:01:26.720><c> is</c><00:01:26.880><c> currently</c><00:01:27.200><c> free</c><00:01:27.439><c> on</c><00:01:27.600><c> the</c><00:01:27.680><c> AI</c><00:01:28.400><c> gateway</c>

00:01:28.789 --> 00:01:28.799 align:start position:0%
Jeb is currently free on the AI gateway
 

00:01:28.799 --> 00:01:32.870 align:start position:0%
Jeb is currently free on the AI gateway
by<00:01:29.040><c> Versel.</c><00:01:30.159><c> But</c><00:01:30.720><c> even</c><00:01:31.040><c> at</c><00:01:31.360><c> list</c><00:01:31.680><c> price,</c><00:01:32.560><c> it</c><00:01:32.799><c> is</c>

00:01:32.870 --> 00:01:32.880 align:start position:0%
by Versel. But even at list price, it is
 

00:01:32.880 --> 00:01:35.030 align:start position:0%
by Versel. But even at list price, it is
a<00:01:33.040><c> very</c><00:01:33.360><c> inexpensive</c><00:01:34.079><c> model.</c><00:01:34.400><c> It</c><00:01:34.640><c> is</c><00:01:34.720><c> a</c><00:01:34.880><c> very</c>

00:01:35.030 --> 00:01:35.040 align:start position:0%
a very inexpensive model. It is a very
 

00:01:35.040 --> 00:01:37.510 align:start position:0%
a very inexpensive model. It is a very
effective<00:01:35.439><c> model</c><00:01:35.759><c> and</c><00:01:36.000><c> it</c><00:01:36.400><c> is</c><00:01:36.720><c> going</c><00:01:36.960><c> to</c><00:01:37.200><c> be</c><00:01:37.280><c> in</c>

00:01:37.510 --> 00:01:37.520 align:start position:0%
effective model and it is going to be in
 

00:01:37.520 --> 00:01:39.270 align:start position:0%
effective model and it is going to be in
the<00:01:37.680><c> middle</c><00:01:37.840><c> of</c><00:01:38.159><c> almost</c><00:01:38.479><c> everything</c><00:01:38.799><c> I</c><00:01:39.040><c> build</c>

00:01:39.270 --> 00:01:39.280 align:start position:0%
the middle of almost everything I build
 

00:01:39.280 --> 00:01:41.190 align:start position:0%
the middle of almost everything I build
from<00:01:39.439><c> here</c><00:01:39.600><c> on</c><00:01:39.759><c> out.</c><00:01:40.216><c> [music]</c><00:01:40.400><c> So,</c><00:01:40.799><c> let's</c><00:01:41.119><c> get</c>

00:01:41.190 --> 00:01:41.200 align:start position:0%
from here on out. [music] So, let's get
 

00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:44.149 align:start position:0%
from here on out. [music] So, let's get
to<00:01:41.360><c> it.</c><00:01:41.920><c> This</c><00:01:42.400><c> episode</c><00:01:42.799><c> is</c><00:01:43.119><c> brought</c><00:01:43.360><c> to</c><00:01:43.520><c> you</c><00:01:43.759><c> by</c>

00:01:44.149 --> 00:01:44.159 align:start position:0%
to it. This episode is brought to you by
 

00:01:44.159 --> 00:01:47.109 align:start position:0%
to it. This episode is brought to you by
Open<00:01:44.560><c> Art</c><00:01:44.880><c> Arena,</c><00:01:45.840><c> the</c><00:01:46.079><c> global</c><00:01:46.479><c> leaderboard</c>

00:01:47.109 --> 00:01:47.119 align:start position:0%
Open Art Arena, the global leaderboard
 

00:01:47.119 --> 00:01:50.149 align:start position:0%
Open Art Arena, the global leaderboard
for<00:01:47.520><c> creative</c><00:01:48.079><c> intelligence.</c><00:01:49.360><c> Every</c><00:01:49.759><c> week,</c>

00:01:50.149 --> 00:01:50.159 align:start position:0%
for creative intelligence. Every week,
 

00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:52.870 align:start position:0%
for creative intelligence. Every week,
new<00:01:50.399><c> AI</c><00:01:50.880><c> models</c><00:01:51.200><c> launch,</c><00:01:51.680><c> and</c><00:01:52.159><c> everyone</c>

00:01:52.870 --> 00:01:52.880 align:start position:0%
new AI models launch, and everyone
 

00:01:52.880 --> 00:01:56.550 align:start position:0%
new AI models launch, and everyone
claims<00:01:53.280><c> to</c><00:01:53.439><c> be</c><00:01:53.600><c> the</c><00:01:53.840><c> best.</c><00:01:54.479><c> But</c><00:01:55.040><c> best</c><00:01:55.360><c> at</c><00:01:55.600><c> what?</c>

00:01:56.550 --> 00:01:56.560 align:start position:0%
claims to be the best. But best at what?
 

00:01:56.560 --> 00:01:58.789 align:start position:0%
claims to be the best. But best at what?
Open<00:01:56.960><c> Art</c><00:01:57.200><c> Arena</c><00:01:57.680><c> is</c><00:01:57.840><c> built</c><00:01:58.079><c> to</c><00:01:58.320><c> answer</c><00:01:58.560><c> the</c>

00:01:58.789 --> 00:01:58.799 align:start position:0%
Open Art Arena is built to answer the
 

00:01:58.799 --> 00:02:01.109 align:start position:0%
Open Art Arena is built to answer the
question<00:01:59.040><c> that</c><00:01:59.360><c> actually</c><00:01:59.759><c> matters.</c><00:02:00.799><c> Which</c>

00:02:01.109 --> 00:02:01.119 align:start position:0%
question that actually matters. Which
 

00:02:01.119 --> 00:02:03.510 align:start position:0%
question that actually matters. Which
model<00:02:01.600><c> is</c><00:02:01.831><c> [music]</c><00:02:01.920><c> best</c><00:02:02.240><c> for</c><00:02:02.560><c> your</c><00:02:02.960><c> specific</c>

00:02:03.510 --> 00:02:03.520 align:start position:0%
model is [music] best for your specific
 

00:02:03.520 --> 00:02:06.310 align:start position:0%
model is [music] best for your specific
job?<00:02:04.399><c> Instead</c><00:02:04.719><c> of</c><00:02:04.880><c> one</c><00:02:05.200><c> overall</c><00:02:05.600><c> winner,</c><00:02:06.079><c> Open</c>

00:02:06.310 --> 00:02:06.320 align:start position:0%
job? Instead of one overall winner, Open
 

00:02:06.320 --> 00:02:09.270 align:start position:0%
job? Instead of one overall winner, Open
Art<00:02:06.560><c> Arena</c><00:02:07.119><c> ranks</c><00:02:07.600><c> models</c><00:02:08.080><c> across</c><00:02:08.720><c> real</c>

00:02:09.270 --> 00:02:09.280 align:start position:0%
Art Arena ranks models across real
 

00:02:09.280 --> 00:02:12.309 align:start position:0%
Art Arena ranks models across real
creative<00:02:09.759><c> tasks</c><00:02:10.720><c> from</c><00:02:11.120><c> advertising</c><00:02:11.760><c> and</c><00:02:12.080><c> film</c>

00:02:12.309 --> 00:02:12.319 align:start position:0%
creative tasks from advertising and film
 

00:02:12.319 --> 00:02:15.110 align:start position:0%
creative tasks from advertising and film
to<00:02:12.640><c> animation,</c><00:02:13.520><c> product,</c><00:02:14.160><c> graphic</c><00:02:14.640><c> design,</c>

00:02:15.110 --> 00:02:15.120 align:start position:0%
to animation, product, graphic design,
 

00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:16.790 align:start position:0%
to animation, product, graphic design,
editing,<00:02:15.680><c> and</c><00:02:15.920><c> lip-sync</c><00:02:16.241><c> [music]</c>

00:02:16.790 --> 00:02:16.800 align:start position:0%
editing, and lip-sync [music]
 

00:02:16.800 --> 00:02:19.750 align:start position:0%
editing, and lip-sync [music]
covering<00:02:17.200><c> both</c><00:02:17.520><c> image</c><00:02:18.080><c> and</c><00:02:18.480><c> video.</c><00:02:19.280><c> And</c><00:02:19.520><c> these</c>

00:02:19.750 --> 00:02:19.760 align:start position:0%
covering both image and video. And these
 

00:02:19.760 --> 00:02:21.670 align:start position:0%
covering both image and video. And these
rankings<00:02:20.160><c> aren't</c><00:02:20.480><c> based</c><00:02:20.720><c> on</c><00:02:20.959><c> hype.</c><00:02:21.440><c> They're</c>

00:02:21.670 --> 00:02:21.680 align:start position:0%
rankings aren't based on hype. They're
 

00:02:21.680 --> 00:02:23.430 align:start position:0%
rankings aren't based on hype. They're
judged<00:02:21.920><c> by</c><00:02:22.160><c> professionals,</c><00:02:22.959><c> industry</c>

00:02:23.430 --> 00:02:23.440 align:start position:0%
judged by professionals, industry
 

00:02:23.440 --> 00:02:25.270 align:start position:0%
judged by professionals, industry
leaders,<00:02:23.920><c> and</c><00:02:24.160><c> working</c><00:02:24.480><c> creators</c><00:02:24.959><c> through</c>

00:02:25.270 --> 00:02:25.280 align:start position:0%
leaders, and working creators through
 

00:02:25.280 --> 00:02:28.229 align:start position:0%
leaders, and working creators through
blind<00:02:25.760><c> evaluations.</c><00:02:27.040><c> So</c><00:02:27.280><c> judges</c><00:02:27.760><c> never</c><00:02:28.080><c> know</c>

00:02:28.229 --> 00:02:28.239 align:start position:0%
blind evaluations. So judges never know
 

00:02:28.239 --> 00:02:30.630 align:start position:0%
blind evaluations. So judges never know
which<00:02:28.560><c> model</c><00:02:28.879><c> produced</c><00:02:29.360><c> which</c><00:02:29.599><c> output.</c><00:02:30.400><c> That</c>

00:02:30.630 --> 00:02:30.640 align:start position:0%
which model produced which output. That
 

00:02:30.640 --> 00:02:32.790 align:start position:0%
which model produced which output. That
means<00:02:30.879><c> you</c><00:02:31.120><c> can</c><00:02:31.200><c> see</c><00:02:31.360><c> how</c><00:02:31.599><c> models</c><00:02:32.239><c> actually</c>

00:02:32.790 --> 00:02:32.800 align:start position:0%
means you can see how models actually
 

00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:34.630 align:start position:0%
means you can see how models actually
perform<00:02:33.280><c> when</c><00:02:33.519><c> it</c><00:02:33.680><c> comes</c><00:02:33.840><c> to</c><00:02:34.000><c> the</c><00:02:34.239><c> creative</c>

00:02:34.630 --> 00:02:34.640 align:start position:0%
perform when it comes to the creative
 

00:02:34.640 --> 00:02:36.790 align:start position:0%
perform when it comes to the creative
work<00:02:34.879><c> you're</c><00:02:35.200><c> doing.</c><00:02:35.920><c> So</c><00:02:36.160><c> stop</c><00:02:36.480><c> guessing</c>

00:02:36.790 --> 00:02:36.800 align:start position:0%
work you're doing. So stop guessing
 

00:02:36.800 --> 00:02:39.190 align:start position:0%
work you're doing. So stop guessing
which<00:02:37.040><c> model</c><00:02:37.280><c> to</c><00:02:37.519><c> use.</c><00:02:38.160><c> Explore</c><00:02:38.720><c> rankings</c>

00:02:39.190 --> 00:02:39.200 align:start position:0%
which model to use. Explore rankings
 

00:02:39.200 --> 00:02:41.589 align:start position:0%
which model to use. Explore rankings
based<00:02:39.519><c> on</c><00:02:39.840><c> real</c><00:02:40.239><c> creative</c><00:02:40.720><c> work</c><00:02:40.959><c> and</c><00:02:41.200><c> find</c><00:02:41.360><c> the</c>

00:02:41.589 --> 00:02:41.599 align:start position:0%
based on real creative work and find the
 

00:02:41.599 --> 00:02:44.070 align:start position:0%
based on real creative work and find the
right<00:02:41.840><c> model</c><00:02:42.160><c> for</c><00:02:42.400><c> your</c><00:02:42.800><c> project</c><00:02:43.440><c> and</c><00:02:43.760><c> save</c>

00:02:44.070 --> 00:02:44.080 align:start position:0%
right model for your project and save
 

00:02:44.080 --> 00:02:48.150 align:start position:0%
right model for your project and save
time<00:02:44.879><c> and</c><00:02:45.200><c> cost.</c><00:02:46.319><c> See</c><00:02:46.560><c> the</c><00:02:46.720><c> rankings</c><00:02:47.280><c> at</c><00:02:47.760><c> Open</c>

00:02:48.150 --> 00:02:48.160 align:start position:0%
time and cost. See the rankings at Open
 

00:02:48.160 --> 00:02:50.790 align:start position:0%
time and cost. See the rankings at Open
Art<00:02:48.720><c> Arena.</c><00:02:49.599><c> So</c><00:02:49.760><c> if</c><00:02:49.920><c> I</c><00:02:50.000><c> were</c><00:02:50.160><c> to</c><00:02:50.239><c> explain</c><00:02:50.480><c> Jev</c>

00:02:50.790 --> 00:02:50.800 align:start position:0%
Art Arena. So if I were to explain Jev
 

00:02:50.800 --> 00:02:52.309 align:start position:0%
Art Arena. So if I were to explain Jev
to<00:02:50.959><c> you,</c><00:02:51.120><c> I</c><00:02:51.280><c> would</c><00:02:51.360><c> go</c><00:02:51.519><c> to</c><00:02:51.599><c> this</c><00:02:51.760><c> table</c><00:02:52.000><c> on</c><00:02:52.160><c> the</c>

00:02:52.309 --> 00:02:52.319 align:start position:0%
to you, I would go to this table on the
 

00:02:52.319 --> 00:02:54.949 align:start position:0%
to you, I would go to this table on the
type<00:02:53.040><c> blog</c><00:02:53.360><c> post</c><00:02:53.680><c> announcing</c><00:02:54.160><c> Jev.</c><00:02:54.560><c> And</c><00:02:54.720><c> it</c>

00:02:54.949 --> 00:02:54.959 align:start position:0%
type blog post announcing Jev. And it
 

00:02:54.959 --> 00:02:57.430 align:start position:0%
type blog post announcing Jev. And it
basically<00:02:55.280><c> compares</c><00:02:56.239><c> normal</c><00:02:56.560><c> LLMs</c><00:02:57.200><c> on</c><00:02:57.360><c> the</c>

00:02:57.430 --> 00:02:57.440 align:start position:0%
basically compares normal LLMs on the
 

00:02:57.440 --> 00:03:00.710 align:start position:0%
basically compares normal LLMs on the
left,<00:02:58.000><c> Jev</c><00:02:58.400><c> style</c><00:02:58.720><c> LLMs</c><00:02:59.360><c> on</c><00:02:59.519><c> the</c><00:02:59.599><c> right.</c><00:03:00.400><c> Both</c>

00:03:00.710 --> 00:03:00.720 align:start position:0%
left, Jev style LLMs on the right. Both
 

00:03:00.720 --> 00:03:02.630 align:start position:0%
left, Jev style LLMs on the right. Both
take<00:03:00.879><c> in</c><00:03:01.120><c> unstructured</c><00:03:01.760><c> data</c><00:03:01.920><c> as</c><00:03:02.159><c> inputs.</c>

00:03:02.630 --> 00:03:02.640 align:start position:0%
take in unstructured data as inputs.
 

00:03:02.640 --> 00:03:04.550 align:start position:0%
take in unstructured data as inputs.
Both<00:03:02.800><c> take</c><00:03:02.959><c> in</c><00:03:03.280><c> text</c><00:03:03.519><c> as</c><00:03:03.680><c> inputs.</c><00:03:04.080><c> Jev</c><00:03:04.400><c> does</c>

00:03:04.550 --> 00:03:04.560 align:start position:0%
Both take in text as inputs. Jev does
 

00:03:04.560 --> 00:03:06.949 align:start position:0%
Both take in text as inputs. Jev does
not<00:03:04.720><c> take</c><00:03:04.800><c> in</c><00:03:05.120><c> images,</c><00:03:06.080><c> but</c><00:03:06.239><c> it</c><00:03:06.400><c> takes</c><00:03:06.560><c> in</c><00:03:06.800><c> text</c>

00:03:06.949 --> 00:03:06.959 align:start position:0%
not take in images, but it takes in text
 

00:03:06.959 --> 00:03:08.630 align:start position:0%
not take in images, but it takes in text
and<00:03:07.120><c> it</c><00:03:07.200><c> takes</c><00:03:07.360><c> in</c><00:03:07.599><c> text</c><00:03:07.840><c> descriptions</c><00:03:08.400><c> of</c>

00:03:08.630 --> 00:03:08.640 align:start position:0%
and it takes in text descriptions of
 

00:03:08.640 --> 00:03:10.470 align:start position:0%
and it takes in text descriptions of
images<00:03:08.959><c> if</c><00:03:09.120><c> you</c><00:03:09.200><c> really</c><00:03:09.440><c> need</c><00:03:09.599><c> to</c><00:03:09.680><c> get</c><00:03:09.840><c> there.</c>

00:03:10.470 --> 00:03:10.480 align:start position:0%
images if you really need to get there.
 

00:03:10.480 --> 00:03:12.390 align:start position:0%
images if you really need to get there.
The<00:03:10.800><c> outputs</c><00:03:11.280><c> though</c><00:03:11.519><c> are</c><00:03:11.680><c> very</c><00:03:12.000><c> different.</c>

00:03:12.390 --> 00:03:12.400 align:start position:0%
The outputs though are very different.
 

00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:14.309 align:start position:0%
The outputs though are very different.
With<00:03:12.720><c> the</c><00:03:12.959><c> standard</c><00:03:13.280><c> LLMs</c><00:03:13.840><c> that</c><00:03:13.920><c> you're</c><00:03:14.159><c> used</c>

00:03:14.309 --> 00:03:14.319 align:start position:0%
With the standard LLMs that you're used
 

00:03:14.319 --> 00:03:16.390 align:start position:0%
With the standard LLMs that you're used
to<00:03:14.480><c> working</c><00:03:14.720><c> with,</c><00:03:15.120><c> you</c><00:03:15.360><c> are</c><00:03:15.599><c> getting</c><00:03:16.000><c> strings</c>

00:03:16.390 --> 00:03:16.400 align:start position:0%
to working with, you are getting strings
 

00:03:16.400 --> 00:03:17.990 align:start position:0%
to working with, you are getting strings
and<00:03:16.640><c> generated</c><00:03:17.120><c> text</c><00:03:17.360><c> out.</c><00:03:17.599><c> So</c><00:03:17.760><c> you're</c>

00:03:17.990 --> 00:03:18.000 align:start position:0%
and generated text out. So you're
 

00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:20.790 align:start position:0%
and generated text out. So you're
getting<00:03:18.400><c> text</c><00:03:18.720><c> in,</c><00:03:19.120><c> text</c><00:03:19.440><c> out.</c><00:03:20.080><c> With</c><00:03:20.319><c> Jev,</c>

00:03:20.790 --> 00:03:20.800 align:start position:0%
getting text in, text out. With Jev,
 

00:03:20.800 --> 00:03:23.430 align:start position:0%
getting text in, text out. With Jev,
you're<00:03:21.120><c> getting</c><00:03:21.280><c> text</c><00:03:21.599><c> in,</c><00:03:22.560><c> type</c><00:03:22.879><c> safe</c><00:03:23.120><c> values</c>

00:03:23.430 --> 00:03:23.440 align:start position:0%
you're getting text in, type safe values
 

00:03:23.440 --> 00:03:25.270 align:start position:0%
you're getting text in, type safe values
out.<00:03:23.680><c> And</c><00:03:23.760><c> what</c><00:03:23.920><c> I</c><00:03:24.080><c> mean</c><00:03:24.159><c> by</c><00:03:24.319><c> type</c><00:03:24.640><c> safe</c><00:03:24.959><c> values</c>

00:03:25.270 --> 00:03:25.280 align:start position:0%
out. And what I mean by type safe values
 

00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:27.830 align:start position:0%
out. And what I mean by type safe values
is<00:03:25.519><c> these</c><00:03:25.760><c> are</c><00:03:25.920><c> values</c><00:03:26.319><c> that</c><00:03:26.480><c> are</c><00:03:26.720><c> predefined</c>

00:03:27.830 --> 00:03:27.840 align:start position:0%
is these are values that are predefined
 

00:03:27.840 --> 00:03:30.309 align:start position:0%
is these are values that are predefined
that<00:03:28.080><c> then</c><00:03:28.319><c> Jev</c><00:03:28.800><c> picks</c><00:03:29.120><c> from</c><00:03:29.360><c> and</c><00:03:29.680><c> selects</c><00:03:30.080><c> and</c>

00:03:30.309 --> 00:03:30.319 align:start position:0%
that then Jev picks from and selects and
 

00:03:30.319 --> 00:03:32.390 align:start position:0%
that then Jev picks from and selects and
returns<00:03:30.720><c> to</c><00:03:30.879><c> you.</c><00:03:31.680><c> We</c><00:03:31.840><c> will</c><00:03:32.000><c> show</c><00:03:32.080><c> you</c><00:03:32.239><c> what</c>

00:03:32.390 --> 00:03:32.400 align:start position:0%
returns to you. We will show you what
 

00:03:32.400 --> 00:03:33.670 align:start position:0%
returns to you. We will show you what
those<00:03:32.560><c> values</c><00:03:32.879><c> are,</c><00:03:33.040><c> but</c><00:03:33.360><c> essentially</c>

00:03:33.670 --> 00:03:33.680 align:start position:0%
those values are, but essentially
 

00:03:33.680 --> 00:03:36.470 align:start position:0%
those values are, but essentially
they're<00:03:33.920><c> like</c><00:03:34.799><c> it's</c><00:03:35.120><c> this</c><00:03:35.360><c> or</c><00:03:35.519><c> that.</c><00:03:36.080><c> It's</c><00:03:36.319><c> yes</c>

00:03:36.470 --> 00:03:36.480 align:start position:0%
they're like it's this or that. It's yes
 

00:03:36.480 --> 00:03:38.869 align:start position:0%
they're like it's this or that. It's yes
or<00:03:36.720><c> no.</c><00:03:37.280><c> It's</c><00:03:37.519><c> 1</c><00:03:37.760><c> through</c><00:03:38.000><c> 10.</c><00:03:38.319><c> Like</c><00:03:38.560><c> it's</c>

00:03:38.869 --> 00:03:38.879 align:start position:0%
or no. It's 1 through 10. Like it's
 

00:03:38.879 --> 00:03:41.589 align:start position:0%
or no. It's 1 through 10. Like it's
pretty<00:03:39.760><c> simple.</c><00:03:40.159><c> Now</c><00:03:40.400><c> it</c><00:03:40.720><c> sounds</c><00:03:41.040><c> simple,</c><00:03:41.440><c> but</c>

00:03:41.589 --> 00:03:41.599 align:start position:0%
pretty simple. Now it sounds simple, but
 

00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:44.390 align:start position:0%
pretty simple. Now it sounds simple, but
it<00:03:41.840><c> is</c><00:03:42.080><c> incredibly</c><00:03:42.879><c> powerful</c><00:03:43.760><c> when</c><00:03:44.080><c> you</c><00:03:44.239><c> put</c>

00:03:44.390 --> 00:03:44.400 align:start position:0%
it is incredibly powerful when you put
 

00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:47.030 align:start position:0%
it is incredibly powerful when you put
it<00:03:44.640><c> against</c><00:03:45.040><c> the</c><00:03:45.280><c> right</c><00:03:45.680><c> problem.</c>

00:03:47.030 --> 00:03:47.040 align:start position:0%
it against the right problem.
 

00:03:47.040 --> 00:03:49.509 align:start position:0%
it against the right problem.
The<00:03:47.360><c> other</c><00:03:47.599><c> thing</c><00:03:47.680><c> that</c><00:03:48.000><c> you</c><00:03:48.239><c> will</c><00:03:48.480><c> notice</c>

00:03:49.509 --> 00:03:49.519 align:start position:0%
The other thing that you will notice
 

00:03:49.519 --> 00:03:53.350 align:start position:0%
The other thing that you will notice
about<00:03:49.920><c> Jeff</c><00:03:50.319><c> is</c><00:03:50.560><c> it</c><00:03:50.799><c> is</c><00:03:51.120><c> cheap</c><00:03:51.599><c> AF</c><00:03:52.640><c> and</c><00:03:52.879><c> it</c><00:03:53.120><c> is</c>

00:03:53.350 --> 00:03:53.360 align:start position:0%
about Jeff is it is cheap AF and it is
 

00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:56.789 align:start position:0%
about Jeff is it is cheap AF and it is
fast<00:03:53.920><c> AF.</c><00:03:54.640><c> And</c><00:03:54.879><c> so</c><00:03:55.680><c> if</c><00:03:55.920><c> you</c><00:03:56.080><c> look</c><00:03:56.319><c> at</c><00:03:56.480><c> the</c>

00:03:56.789 --> 00:03:56.799 align:start position:0%
fast AF. And so if you look at the
 

00:03:56.799 --> 00:03:58.789 align:start position:0%
fast AF. And so if you look at the
current<00:03:57.040><c> cost</c><00:03:57.280><c> of</c><00:03:57.519><c> input</c><00:03:57.840><c> and</c><00:03:58.000><c> output</c><00:03:58.319><c> tokens,</c>

00:03:58.789 --> 00:03:58.799 align:start position:0%
current cost of input and output tokens,
 

00:03:58.799 --> 00:04:01.910 align:start position:0%
current cost of input and output tokens,
it<00:03:58.959><c> can</c><00:03:59.120><c> be</c><00:03:59.360><c> pennies</c><00:03:59.840><c> to</c><00:04:00.239><c> tens</c><00:04:01.120><c> or</c><00:04:01.439><c> hundreds</c><00:04:01.760><c> of</c>

00:04:01.910 --> 00:04:01.920 align:start position:0%
it can be pennies to tens or hundreds of
 

00:04:01.920 --> 00:04:04.710 align:start position:0%
it can be pennies to tens or hundreds of
dollars<00:04:02.239><c> per</c><00:04:02.480><c> million</c><00:04:02.799><c> output</c><00:04:03.200><c> tokens.</c>

00:04:04.710 --> 00:04:04.720 align:start position:0%
dollars per million output tokens.
 

00:04:04.720 --> 00:04:06.789 align:start position:0%
dollars per million output tokens.
Jev<00:04:05.120><c> only</c><00:04:05.360><c> charges</c><00:04:05.760><c> you</c><00:04:05.920><c> on</c><00:04:06.159><c> input</c><00:04:06.480><c> tokens</c>

00:04:06.789 --> 00:04:06.799 align:start position:0%
Jev only charges you on input tokens
 

00:04:06.799 --> 00:04:10.390 align:start position:0%
Jev only charges you on input tokens
because<00:04:06.959><c> it</c><00:04:07.120><c> barely</c><00:04:07.519><c> outputs</c><00:04:08.319><c> anything.</c><00:04:09.599><c> And</c>

00:04:10.390 --> 00:04:10.400 align:start position:0%
because it barely outputs anything. And
 

00:04:10.400 --> 00:04:14.710 align:start position:0%
because it barely outputs anything. And
it<00:04:10.720><c> is</c><00:04:11.920><c> 4</c><00:04:12.239><c> cents</c><00:04:12.799><c> per</c><00:04:13.120><c> million</c><00:04:13.760><c> input</c><00:04:14.239><c> tokens.</c>

00:04:14.710 --> 00:04:14.720 align:start position:0%
it is 4 cents per million input tokens.
 

00:04:14.720 --> 00:04:18.069 align:start position:0%
it is 4 cents per million input tokens.
It<00:04:14.959><c> is</c><00:04:15.040><c> like</c><00:04:15.519><c> dirt</c><00:04:16.400><c> freaking</c><00:04:17.040><c> cheap.</c><00:04:17.840><c> And</c>

00:04:18.069 --> 00:04:18.079 align:start position:0%
It is like dirt freaking cheap. And
 

00:04:18.079 --> 00:04:21.749 align:start position:0%
It is like dirt freaking cheap. And
because<00:04:19.040><c> they</c><00:04:19.440><c> output</c><00:04:20.799><c> basically</c><00:04:21.359><c> nothing,</c>

00:04:21.749 --> 00:04:21.759 align:start position:0%
because they output basically nothing,
 

00:04:21.759 --> 00:04:24.230 align:start position:0%
because they output basically nothing,
they<00:04:21.919><c> don't</c><00:04:22.079><c> even</c><00:04:22.320><c> charge</c><00:04:22.639><c> you</c><00:04:23.280><c> for</c><00:04:23.600><c> output</c>

00:04:24.230 --> 00:04:24.240 align:start position:0%
they don't even charge you for output
 

00:04:24.240 --> 00:04:27.510 align:start position:0%
they don't even charge you for output
tokens.<00:04:25.120><c> Um</c><00:04:25.600><c> whereas</c><00:04:26.240><c> the</c><00:04:26.639><c> standard</c><00:04:26.960><c> LM</c><00:04:27.360><c> are</c>

00:04:27.510 --> 00:04:27.520 align:start position:0%
tokens. Um whereas the standard LM are
 

00:04:27.520 --> 00:04:30.550 align:start position:0%
tokens. Um whereas the standard LM are
going<00:04:27.600><c> to</c><00:04:27.680><c> charge</c><00:04:27.919><c> you</c><00:04:28.639><c> tons</c><00:04:29.120><c> for</c><00:04:29.520><c> the</c><00:04:29.759><c> output</c>

00:04:30.550 --> 00:04:30.560 align:start position:0%
going to charge you tons for the output
 

00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:32.550 align:start position:0%
going to charge you tons for the output
tokens.<00:04:31.199><c> And</c><00:04:31.360><c> then</c><00:04:31.440><c> I'll</c><00:04:31.680><c> go</c><00:04:31.759><c> into</c><00:04:32.000><c> use</c><00:04:32.160><c> cases,</c>

00:04:32.550 --> 00:04:32.560 align:start position:0%
tokens. And then I'll go into use cases,
 

00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:33.670 align:start position:0%
tokens. And then I'll go into use cases,
which<00:04:32.720><c> is</c><00:04:32.800><c> how</c><00:04:32.960><c> you</c><00:04:33.120><c> would</c><00:04:33.280><c> use</c><00:04:33.360><c> like</c><00:04:33.520><c> a</c>

00:04:33.670 --> 00:04:33.680 align:start position:0%
which is how you would use like a
 

00:04:33.680 --> 00:04:35.590 align:start position:0%
which is how you would use like a
standard<00:04:33.919><c> LLM</c><00:04:34.560><c> versus</c><00:04:34.960><c> why</c><00:04:35.199><c> you</c><00:04:35.360><c> would</c><00:04:35.440><c> use</c>

00:04:35.590 --> 00:04:35.600 align:start position:0%
standard LLM versus why you would use
 

00:04:35.600 --> 00:04:38.390 align:start position:0%
standard LLM versus why you would use
Jev.<00:04:36.400><c> You</c><00:04:36.560><c> know,</c><00:04:36.800><c> standard</c><00:04:37.120><c> LMS,</c><00:04:37.759><c> chat</c><00:04:38.000><c> bots</c>

00:04:38.390 --> 00:04:38.400 align:start position:0%
Jev. You know, standard LMS, chat bots
 

00:04:38.400 --> 00:04:39.749 align:start position:0%
Jev. You know, standard LMS, chat bots
where<00:04:38.560><c> you</c><00:04:38.639><c> want</c><00:04:38.800><c> text</c><00:04:38.960><c> in,</c><00:04:39.280><c> you</c><00:04:39.360><c> want</c><00:04:39.440><c> text</c>

00:04:39.749 --> 00:04:39.759 align:start position:0%
where you want text in, you want text
 

00:04:39.759 --> 00:04:42.150 align:start position:0%
where you want text in, you want text
out.<00:04:40.320><c> Coding</c><00:04:40.960><c> where</c><00:04:41.199><c> you</c><00:04:41.360><c> want,</c><00:04:41.759><c> you</c><00:04:41.919><c> know,</c>

00:04:42.150 --> 00:04:42.160 align:start position:0%
out. Coding where you want, you know,
 

00:04:42.160 --> 00:04:45.350 align:start position:0%
out. Coding where you want, you know,
code<00:04:42.560><c> to</c><00:04:42.800><c> be</c><00:04:43.040><c> produced.</c><00:04:44.160><c> Um,</c><00:04:44.479><c> and</c><00:04:44.720><c> so</c><00:04:45.040><c> it's</c>

00:04:45.350 --> 00:04:45.360 align:start position:0%
code to be produced. Um, and so it's
 

00:04:45.360 --> 00:04:47.830 align:start position:0%
code to be produced. Um, and so it's
it's<00:04:45.759><c> great</c><00:04:46.000><c> for</c><00:04:46.400><c> things</c><00:04:46.639><c> where</c><00:04:46.960><c> you</c><00:04:47.199><c> need</c>

00:04:47.830 --> 00:04:47.840 align:start position:0%
it's great for things where you need
 

00:04:47.840 --> 00:04:51.430 align:start position:0%
it's great for things where you need
stuff<00:04:48.320><c> generated,</c><00:04:49.600><c> but</c><00:04:50.000><c> Jev</c><00:04:50.479><c> is</c><00:04:50.720><c> really</c><00:04:51.040><c> great</c>

00:04:51.430 --> 00:04:51.440 align:start position:0%
stuff generated, but Jev is really great
 

00:04:51.440 --> 00:04:54.070 align:start position:0%
stuff generated, but Jev is really great
for<00:04:52.400><c> making</c><00:04:52.720><c> decisions.</c><00:04:53.360><c> That's</c><00:04:53.680><c> ultimately</c>

00:04:54.070 --> 00:04:54.080 align:start position:0%
for making decisions. That's ultimately
 

00:04:54.080 --> 00:04:55.189 align:start position:0%
for making decisions. That's ultimately
I've<00:04:54.240><c> been</c><00:04:54.400><c> calling</c><00:04:54.560><c> this</c><00:04:54.800><c> it's</c><00:04:54.960><c> like</c><00:04:55.040><c> a</c>

00:04:55.189 --> 00:04:55.199 align:start position:0%
I've been calling this it's like a
 

00:04:55.199 --> 00:04:57.189 align:start position:0%
I've been calling this it's like a
decision<00:04:55.520><c> model.</c><00:04:56.160><c> So</c><00:04:56.320><c> you</c><00:04:56.720><c> give</c><00:04:56.880><c> it</c><00:04:57.040><c> a</c>

00:04:57.189 --> 00:04:57.199 align:start position:0%
decision model. So you give it a
 

00:04:57.199 --> 00:04:59.430 align:start position:0%
decision model. So you give it a
decision<00:04:57.520><c> and</c><00:04:57.759><c> it</c><00:04:58.000><c> makes</c><00:04:58.240><c> a</c><00:04:58.479><c> decision</c><00:04:58.720><c> and</c><00:04:59.040><c> and</c>

00:04:59.430 --> 00:04:59.440 align:start position:0%
decision and it makes a decision and and
 

00:04:59.440 --> 00:05:02.150 align:start position:0%
decision and it makes a decision and and
it's<00:04:59.680><c> high</c><00:05:00.000><c> agency</c><00:05:00.560><c> I</c><00:05:00.720><c> would</c><00:05:00.880><c> say.</c><00:05:01.520><c> So</c><00:05:01.680><c> if</c><00:05:01.919><c> you</c>

00:05:02.150 --> 00:05:02.160 align:start position:0%
it's high agency I would say. So if you
 

00:05:02.160 --> 00:05:05.830 align:start position:0%
it's high agency I would say. So if you
need<00:05:02.800><c> smart</c><00:05:03.759><c> if</c><00:05:04.320><c> statements,</c><00:05:05.280><c> should</c><00:05:05.520><c> I</c><00:05:05.680><c> go</c>

00:05:05.830 --> 00:05:05.840 align:start position:0%
need smart if statements, should I go
 

00:05:05.840 --> 00:05:09.029 align:start position:0%
need smart if statements, should I go
left<00:05:06.000><c> or</c><00:05:06.240><c> right?</c><00:05:06.880><c> If</c><00:05:07.120><c> it's</c><00:05:07.680><c> good,</c><00:05:08.639><c> put</c><00:05:08.800><c> it</c><00:05:08.880><c> to</c>

00:05:09.029 --> 00:05:09.039 align:start position:0%
left or right? If it's good, put it to
 

00:05:09.039 --> 00:05:10.629 align:start position:0%
left or right? If it's good, put it to
this<00:05:09.280><c> person.</c><00:05:09.520><c> If</c><00:05:09.680><c> it's</c><00:05:09.840><c> bad,</c><00:05:10.160><c> send</c><00:05:10.320><c> it</c><00:05:10.400><c> to</c>

00:05:10.629 --> 00:05:10.639 align:start position:0%
this person. If it's bad, send it to
 

00:05:10.639 --> 00:05:12.870 align:start position:0%
this person. If it's bad, send it to
support.<00:05:11.600><c> All</c><00:05:11.759><c> that</c><00:05:11.919><c> kind</c><00:05:12.080><c> of</c><00:05:12.160><c> stuff</c><00:05:12.479><c> Jeff</c><00:05:12.720><c> is</c>

00:05:12.870 --> 00:05:12.880 align:start position:0%
support. All that kind of stuff Jeff is
 

00:05:12.880 --> 00:05:14.310 align:start position:0%
support. All that kind of stuff Jeff is
really<00:05:13.039><c> good</c><00:05:13.120><c> at.</c><00:05:13.440><c> It's</c><00:05:13.759><c> really</c><00:05:14.000><c> good</c><00:05:14.080><c> at</c>

00:05:14.310 --> 00:05:14.320 align:start position:0%
really good at. It's really good at
 

00:05:14.320 --> 00:05:15.749 align:start position:0%
really good at. It's really good at
classifying<00:05:14.880><c> data.</c><00:05:15.199><c> That's</c><00:05:15.360><c> a</c><00:05:15.440><c> lot</c><00:05:15.520><c> of</c><00:05:15.600><c> what</c>

00:05:15.749 --> 00:05:15.759 align:start position:0%
classifying data. That's a lot of what
 

00:05:15.759 --> 00:05:17.189 align:start position:0%
classifying data. That's a lot of what
I'm<00:05:15.919><c> going</c><00:05:15.919><c> to</c><00:05:16.000><c> talk</c><00:05:16.160><c> to</c><00:05:16.240><c> you</c><00:05:16.400><c> about</c><00:05:16.560><c> today.</c>

00:05:17.189 --> 00:05:17.199 align:start position:0%
I'm going to talk to you about today.
 

00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:19.749 align:start position:0%
I'm going to talk to you about today.
And<00:05:17.280><c> it's</c><00:05:17.600><c> really</c><00:05:17.840><c> good</c><00:05:18.160><c> at</c><00:05:18.800><c> real</c><00:05:19.039><c> time.</c><00:05:19.520><c> So,</c>

00:05:19.749 --> 00:05:19.759 align:start position:0%
And it's really good at real time. So,
 

00:05:19.759 --> 00:05:21.749 align:start position:0%
And it's really good at real time. So,
it<00:05:20.000><c> is</c><00:05:20.240><c> fast,</c><00:05:20.560><c> fast,</c><00:05:20.800><c> fast.</c><00:05:21.120><c> So,</c><00:05:21.280><c> you</c><00:05:21.440><c> can</c><00:05:21.600><c> put</c>

00:05:21.749 --> 00:05:21.759 align:start position:0%
it is fast, fast, fast. So, you can put
 

00:05:21.759 --> 00:05:24.710 align:start position:0%
it is fast, fast, fast. So, you can put
an<00:05:22.000><c> LLM</c><00:05:22.880><c> in</c><00:05:23.120><c> a</c><00:05:23.280><c> real-time</c><00:05:23.680><c> loop</c><00:05:24.000><c> in</c><00:05:24.160><c> a</c><00:05:24.320><c> way</c><00:05:24.400><c> that</c>

00:05:24.710 --> 00:05:24.720 align:start position:0%
an LLM in a real-time loop in a way that
 

00:05:24.720 --> 00:05:27.670 align:start position:0%
an LLM in a real-time loop in a way that
was<00:05:24.960><c> not</c><00:05:25.199><c> performant</c><00:05:25.759><c> enough</c><00:05:26.720><c> with</c><00:05:27.280><c> these</c>

00:05:27.670 --> 00:05:27.680 align:start position:0%
was not performant enough with these
 

00:05:27.680 --> 00:05:30.070 align:start position:0%
was not performant enough with these
other<00:05:27.919><c> models.</c><00:05:28.720><c> I</c><00:05:28.960><c> do</c><00:05:29.120><c> want</c><00:05:29.280><c> to</c><00:05:29.440><c> explain</c>

00:05:30.070 --> 00:05:30.080 align:start position:0%
other models. I do want to explain
 

00:05:30.080 --> 00:05:32.950 align:start position:0%
other models. I do want to explain
exactly<00:05:30.720><c> what</c><00:05:31.360><c> Jev</c><00:05:31.840><c> outputs.</c><00:05:32.479><c> And</c><00:05:32.639><c> so,</c><00:05:32.800><c> I</c>

00:05:32.950 --> 00:05:32.960 align:start position:0%
exactly what Jev outputs. And so, I
 

00:05:32.960 --> 00:05:34.070 align:start position:0%
exactly what Jev outputs. And so, I
would<00:05:33.120><c> highly</c><00:05:33.440><c> recommend</c><00:05:33.680><c> if</c><00:05:33.840><c> you're</c><00:05:34.000><c> going</c>

00:05:34.070 --> 00:05:34.080 align:start position:0%
would highly recommend if you're going
 

00:05:34.080 --> 00:05:36.230 align:start position:0%
would highly recommend if you're going
to<00:05:34.160><c> use</c><00:05:34.240><c> Jev,</c><00:05:34.720><c> go</c><00:05:34.880><c> to</c><00:05:34.960><c> their</c><00:05:35.199><c> docs.</c><00:05:35.840><c> The</c><00:05:36.080><c> two</c>

00:05:36.230 --> 00:05:36.240 align:start position:0%
to use Jev, go to their docs. The two
 

00:05:36.240 --> 00:05:38.150 align:start position:0%
to use Jev, go to their docs. The two
places<00:05:36.560><c> that</c><00:05:36.720><c> I'm</c><00:05:36.960><c> using</c><00:05:37.120><c> the</c><00:05:37.360><c> most</c><00:05:37.680><c> are</c><00:05:37.919><c> the</c>

00:05:38.150 --> 00:05:38.160 align:start position:0%
places that I'm using the most are the
 

00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:40.070 align:start position:0%
places that I'm using the most are the
primitives,<00:05:38.800><c> so</c><00:05:39.039><c> what</c><00:05:39.199><c> it</c><00:05:39.360><c> returns.</c><00:05:39.840><c> And</c><00:05:39.919><c> then</c>

00:05:40.070 --> 00:05:40.080 align:start position:0%
primitives, so what it returns. And then
 

00:05:40.080 --> 00:05:42.550 align:start position:0%
primitives, so what it returns. And then
I<00:05:40.240><c> use</c><00:05:40.320><c> some</c><00:05:40.479><c> of</c><00:05:40.560><c> the</c><00:05:40.720><c> patterns</c><00:05:41.039><c> in</c><00:05:41.280><c> cookbooks.</c>

00:05:42.550 --> 00:05:42.560 align:start position:0%
I use some of the patterns in cookbooks.
 

00:05:42.560 --> 00:05:44.310 align:start position:0%
I use some of the patterns in cookbooks.
So<00:05:42.880><c> what</c><00:05:43.120><c> will</c><00:05:43.280><c> Jev</c><00:05:43.600><c> return</c><00:05:43.840><c> to</c><00:05:43.919><c> you?</c><00:05:44.160><c> It</c><00:05:44.240><c> will</c>

00:05:44.310 --> 00:05:44.320 align:start position:0%
So what will Jev return to you? It will
 

00:05:44.320 --> 00:05:45.749 align:start position:0%
So what will Jev return to you? It will
essentially<00:05:44.720><c> return</c><00:05:45.039><c> one</c><00:05:45.199><c> of</c><00:05:45.360><c> three</c><00:05:45.520><c> things.</c>

00:05:45.749 --> 00:05:45.759 align:start position:0%
essentially return one of three things.
 

00:05:45.759 --> 00:05:47.510 align:start position:0%
essentially return one of three things.
It<00:05:45.919><c> will</c><00:05:46.080><c> return</c><00:05:46.320><c> a</c><00:05:46.479><c> choice</c><00:05:46.800><c> which</c><00:05:47.039><c> means</c><00:05:47.280><c> you</c>

00:05:47.510 --> 00:05:47.520 align:start position:0%
It will return a choice which means you
 

00:05:47.520 --> 00:05:50.629 align:start position:0%
It will return a choice which means you
can<00:05:47.600><c> give</c><00:05:47.759><c> it</c><00:05:48.400><c> text,</c><00:05:49.280><c> you</c><00:05:49.440><c> can</c><00:05:49.520><c> give</c><00:05:49.680><c> it</c><00:05:50.080><c> a</c><00:05:50.400><c> list</c>

00:05:50.629 --> 00:05:50.639 align:start position:0%
can give it text, you can give it a list
 

00:05:50.639 --> 00:05:53.909 align:start position:0%
can give it text, you can give it a list
of<00:05:50.880><c> choices</c><00:05:51.360><c> and</c><00:05:51.520><c> it</c><00:05:51.680><c> will</c><00:05:51.919><c> pick</c><00:05:52.720><c> a</c><00:05:53.039><c> choice.</c>

00:05:53.909 --> 00:05:53.919 align:start position:0%
of choices and it will pick a choice.
 

00:05:53.919 --> 00:05:57.670 align:start position:0%
of choices and it will pick a choice.
So,<00:05:54.880><c> if</c><00:05:55.280><c> my</c><00:05:55.919><c> question</c><00:05:56.320><c> is,</c><00:05:57.039><c> what</c><00:05:57.360><c> should</c><00:05:57.520><c> I</c>

00:05:57.670 --> 00:05:57.680 align:start position:0%
So, if my question is, what should I
 

00:05:57.680 --> 00:06:00.870 align:start position:0%
So, if my question is, what should I
wear<00:05:57.919><c> on</c><00:05:58.080><c> this</c><00:05:58.320><c> date</c><00:05:59.120><c> and</c><00:05:59.360><c> my</c><00:05:59.600><c> choice</c><00:06:00.000><c> is</c><00:06:00.560><c> a</c>

00:06:00.870 --> 00:06:00.880 align:start position:0%
wear on this date and my choice is a
 

00:06:00.880 --> 00:06:06.150 align:start position:0%
wear on this date and my choice is a
dress,<00:06:02.160><c> jeans,</c><00:06:03.199><c> workout</c><00:06:03.680><c> clothes,</c><00:06:04.800><c> ski</c><00:06:05.199><c> gear,</c>

00:06:06.150 --> 00:06:06.160 align:start position:0%
dress, jeans, workout clothes, ski gear,
 

00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:09.110 align:start position:0%
dress, jeans, workout clothes, ski gear,
or<00:06:07.440><c> nothing,</c>

00:06:09.110 --> 00:06:09.120 align:start position:0%
or nothing,
 

00:06:09.120 --> 00:06:12.550 align:start position:0%
or nothing,
it'll<00:06:09.520><c> like</c><00:06:09.759><c> maybe</c><00:06:10.160><c> pick</c><00:06:11.120><c> the</c><00:06:11.440><c> dress,</c><00:06:11.919><c> right?</c>

00:06:12.550 --> 00:06:12.560 align:start position:0%
it'll like maybe pick the dress, right?
 

00:06:12.560 --> 00:06:17.029 align:start position:0%
it'll like maybe pick the dress, right?
And<00:06:12.720><c> so</c><00:06:12.960><c> that</c><00:06:13.280><c> is</c><00:06:14.240><c> choice.</c><00:06:15.199><c> If</c><00:06:15.520><c> I</c><00:06:16.160><c> select</c>

00:06:17.029 --> 00:06:17.039 align:start position:0%
And so that is choice. If I select
 

00:06:17.039 --> 00:06:20.070 align:start position:0%
And so that is choice. If I select
score,<00:06:18.240><c> it's</c><00:06:18.479><c> going</c><00:06:18.639><c> to</c><00:06:18.800><c> say</c><00:06:18.960><c> like</c><00:06:19.280><c> how</c><00:06:19.520><c> severe</c>

00:06:20.070 --> 00:06:20.080 align:start position:0%
score, it's going to say like how severe
 

00:06:20.080 --> 00:06:22.950 align:start position:0%
score, it's going to say like how severe
is<00:06:20.240><c> this</c><00:06:20.560><c> or</c><00:06:20.800><c> on</c><00:06:21.120><c> a</c><00:06:21.440><c> score</c><00:06:21.680><c> from</c><00:06:21.919><c> one</c><00:06:22.160><c> to</c><00:06:22.639><c> five,</c>

00:06:22.950 --> 00:06:22.960 align:start position:0%
is this or on a score from one to five,
 

00:06:22.960 --> 00:06:24.950 align:start position:0%
is this or on a score from one to five,
what<00:06:23.120><c> it</c><00:06:23.199><c> is.</c><00:06:23.520><c> This</c><00:06:23.759><c> is</c><00:06:23.919><c> really</c><00:06:24.160><c> good</c><00:06:24.479><c> for</c>

00:06:24.950 --> 00:06:24.960 align:start position:0%
what it is. This is really good for
 

00:06:24.960 --> 00:06:27.670 align:start position:0%
what it is. This is really good for
severity<00:06:25.600><c> rankings.</c><00:06:26.639><c> So</c><00:06:26.880><c> say</c><00:06:27.120><c> the</c><00:06:27.360><c> example</c>

00:06:27.670 --> 00:06:27.680 align:start position:0%
severity rankings. So say the example
 

00:06:27.680 --> 00:06:29.029 align:start position:0%
severity rankings. So say the example
here<00:06:27.840><c> is</c><00:06:27.919><c> a</c><00:06:28.080><c> great</c><00:06:28.240><c> one</c><00:06:28.400><c> which</c><00:06:28.560><c> is</c><00:06:28.639><c> like</c><00:06:28.800><c> if</c><00:06:28.960><c> you</c>

00:06:29.029 --> 00:06:29.039 align:start position:0%
here is a great one which is like if you
 

00:06:29.039 --> 00:06:31.590 align:start position:0%
here is a great one which is like if you
get<00:06:29.199><c> a</c><00:06:29.360><c> bug,</c><00:06:30.080><c> you</c><00:06:30.319><c> want</c><00:06:30.400><c> to</c><00:06:30.479><c> rank</c><00:06:30.720><c> it</c><00:06:31.360><c> like</c>

00:06:31.590 --> 00:06:31.600 align:start position:0%
get a bug, you want to rank it like
 

00:06:31.600 --> 00:06:35.110 align:start position:0%
get a bug, you want to rank it like
cosmetic,<00:06:32.479><c> broken</c><00:06:32.960><c> or</c><00:06:33.199><c> blocking,</c><00:06:34.319><c> Jev</c><00:06:34.720><c> will</c>

00:06:35.110 --> 00:06:35.120 align:start position:0%
cosmetic, broken or blocking, Jev will
 

00:06:35.120 --> 00:06:38.469 align:start position:0%
cosmetic, broken or blocking, Jev will
triage<00:06:35.600><c> that</c><00:06:35.840><c> bug</c><00:06:36.080><c> and</c><00:06:36.319><c> give</c><00:06:36.479><c> it</c><00:06:36.639><c> a</c><00:06:37.199><c> score.</c><00:06:38.319><c> And</c>

00:06:38.469 --> 00:06:38.479 align:start position:0%
triage that bug and give it a score. And
 

00:06:38.479 --> 00:06:40.790 align:start position:0%
triage that bug and give it a score. And
then<00:06:38.639><c> finally,</c><00:06:39.520><c> there's</c><00:06:39.919><c> a</c><00:06:40.080><c> new.</c><00:06:40.479><c> It's</c><00:06:40.639><c> a</c>

00:06:40.790 --> 00:06:40.800 align:start position:0%
then finally, there's a new. It's a
 

00:06:40.800 --> 00:06:43.189 align:start position:0%
then finally, there's a new. It's a
version<00:06:41.039><c> of</c><00:06:41.199><c> a</c><00:06:41.440><c> boolean.</c><00:06:42.400><c> It</c><00:06:42.639><c> basically</c><00:06:42.960><c> tells</c>

00:06:43.189 --> 00:06:43.199 align:start position:0%
version of a boolean. It basically tells
 

00:06:43.199 --> 00:06:45.909 align:start position:0%
version of a boolean. It basically tells
you<00:06:43.680><c> what</c><00:06:44.080><c> the</c><00:06:44.720><c> likelihood</c><00:06:45.280><c> that</c><00:06:45.520><c> the</c><00:06:45.680><c> answer</c>

00:06:45.909 --> 00:06:45.919 align:start position:0%
you what the likelihood that the answer
 

00:06:45.919 --> 00:06:49.029 align:start position:0%
you what the likelihood that the answer
to<00:06:46.160><c> a</c><00:06:46.319><c> question</c><00:06:46.800><c> is</c><00:06:47.680><c> yes.</c><00:06:48.400><c> So</c><00:06:48.560><c> if</c><00:06:48.720><c> the</c><00:06:48.880><c> answer</c>

00:06:49.029 --> 00:06:49.039 align:start position:0%
to a question is yes. So if the answer
 

00:06:49.039 --> 00:06:51.510 align:start position:0%
to a question is yes. So if the answer
to<00:06:49.199><c> a</c><00:06:49.440><c> question</c><00:06:49.600><c> is</c><00:06:49.759><c> yes</c><00:06:50.000><c> or</c><00:06:50.160><c> no,</c><00:06:50.800><c> is</c><00:06:51.039><c> Claire</c><00:06:51.280><c> a</c>

00:06:51.510 --> 00:06:51.520 align:start position:0%
to a question is yes or no, is Claire a
 

00:06:51.520 --> 00:06:53.270 align:start position:0%
to a question is yes or no, is Claire a
podcaster?<00:06:52.160><c> it's</c><00:06:52.479><c> going</c><00:06:52.560><c> to</c><00:06:52.639><c> give</c><00:06:52.720><c> you</c><00:06:52.880><c> like</c><00:06:53.039><c> a</c>

00:06:53.270 --> 00:06:53.280 align:start position:0%
podcaster? it's going to give you like a
 

00:06:53.280 --> 00:06:57.350 align:start position:0%
podcaster? it's going to give you like a
99%<00:06:54.560><c> nule</c><00:06:55.039><c> because</c><00:06:55.360><c> there's</c><00:06:55.680><c> a</c><00:06:55.840><c> 99%</c><00:06:56.560><c> chance</c>

00:06:57.350 --> 00:06:57.360 align:start position:0%
99% nule because there's a 99% chance
 

00:06:57.360 --> 00:07:01.350 align:start position:0%
99% nule because there's a 99% chance
that<00:06:57.680><c> I</c><00:06:57.919><c> am</c><00:06:58.240><c> a</c><00:06:58.560><c> podcaster.</c><00:06:59.440><c> Okay,</c><00:06:59.919><c> so</c><00:07:00.319><c> this</c><00:07:00.639><c> is</c>

00:07:01.350 --> 00:07:01.360 align:start position:0%
that I am a podcaster. Okay, so this is
 

00:07:01.360 --> 00:07:03.510 align:start position:0%
that I am a podcaster. Okay, so this is
how<00:07:02.080><c> you</c><00:07:02.240><c> know</c><00:07:02.319><c> you</c><00:07:02.560><c> would</c><00:07:02.800><c> think</c><00:07:02.960><c> about</c><00:07:03.280><c> the</c>

00:07:03.510 --> 00:07:03.520 align:start position:0%
how you know you would think about the
 

00:07:03.520 --> 00:07:05.430 align:start position:0%
how you know you would think about the
three<00:07:03.759><c> things</c><00:07:04.000><c> it</c><00:07:04.240><c> can</c><00:07:04.319><c> return.</c><00:07:04.720><c> And</c><00:07:04.960><c> again,</c>

00:07:05.430 --> 00:07:05.440 align:start position:0%
three things it can return. And again,
 

00:07:05.440 --> 00:07:06.870 align:start position:0%
three things it can return. And again,
very<00:07:05.840><c> simple,</c><00:07:06.080><c> but</c><00:07:06.319><c> if</c><00:07:06.479><c> you've</c><00:07:06.639><c> been</c><00:07:06.720><c> a</c>

00:07:06.870 --> 00:07:06.880 align:start position:0%
very simple, but if you've been a
 

00:07:06.880 --> 00:07:09.670 align:start position:0%
very simple, but if you've been a
software<00:07:07.280><c> engineer,</c><00:07:08.080><c> this</c><00:07:08.319><c> is</c><00:07:08.479><c> like</c><00:07:08.720><c> 90%</c><00:07:09.440><c> of</c>

00:07:09.670 --> 00:07:09.680 align:start position:0%
software engineer, this is like 90% of
 

00:07:09.680 --> 00:07:11.749 align:start position:0%
software engineer, this is like 90% of
software<00:07:10.080><c> engineering</c><00:07:10.479><c> is</c><00:07:10.720><c> like</c><00:07:11.120><c> doing</c><00:07:11.440><c> these</c>

00:07:11.749 --> 00:07:11.759 align:start position:0%
software engineering is like doing these
 

00:07:11.759 --> 00:07:14.469 align:start position:0%
software engineering is like doing these
things,<00:07:12.160><c> returning</c><00:07:12.720><c> a</c><00:07:12.960><c> choice,</c><00:07:13.919><c> scoring</c>

00:07:14.469 --> 00:07:14.479 align:start position:0%
things, returning a choice, scoring
 

00:07:14.479 --> 00:07:17.510 align:start position:0%
things, returning a choice, scoring
something,<00:07:15.039><c> routing,</c><00:07:16.479><c> saying</c><00:07:16.800><c> yes</c><00:07:16.960><c> or</c><00:07:17.199><c> no.</c>

00:07:17.510 --> 00:07:17.520 align:start position:0%
something, routing, saying yes or no.
 

00:07:17.520 --> 00:07:21.909 align:start position:0%
something, routing, saying yes or no.
And<00:07:17.680><c> so</c><00:07:17.919><c> it</c><00:07:18.160><c> is</c><00:07:18.400><c> just</c><00:07:18.800><c> so</c><00:07:19.440><c> so</c><00:07:19.520><c> so</c><00:07:20.319><c> powerful.</c><00:07:21.599><c> And</c>

00:07:21.909 --> 00:07:21.919 align:start position:0%
And so it is just so so so powerful. And
 

00:07:21.919 --> 00:07:23.909 align:start position:0%
And so it is just so so so powerful. And
the<00:07:22.240><c> number</c><00:07:22.479><c> one</c><00:07:22.720><c> thing</c><00:07:23.039><c> I</c><00:07:23.360><c> have</c><00:07:23.520><c> been</c><00:07:23.680><c> using</c>

00:07:23.909 --> 00:07:23.919 align:start position:0%
the number one thing I have been using
 

00:07:23.919 --> 00:07:27.990 align:start position:0%
the number one thing I have been using
it<00:07:24.080><c> for</c><00:07:24.479><c> is</c><00:07:25.039><c> classification</c><00:07:26.319><c> of</c><00:07:26.560><c> a</c><00:07:26.800><c> vast</c><00:07:27.199><c> sets</c>

00:07:27.990 --> 00:07:28.000 align:start position:0%
it for is classification of a vast sets
 

00:07:28.000 --> 00:07:30.550 align:start position:0%
it for is classification of a vast sets
of<00:07:28.639><c> unstructured</c><00:07:29.360><c> data</c><00:07:29.919><c> that</c><00:07:30.240><c> would</c><00:07:30.400><c> have</c>

00:07:30.550 --> 00:07:30.560 align:start position:0%
of unstructured data that would have
 

00:07:30.560 --> 00:07:33.430 align:start position:0%
of unstructured data that would have
been<00:07:30.880><c> annoying</c><00:07:31.680><c> to</c><00:07:32.080><c> classify</c><00:07:32.800><c> but</c><00:07:32.960><c> is</c><00:07:33.199><c> very</c>

00:07:33.430 --> 00:07:33.440 align:start position:0%
been annoying to classify but is very
 

00:07:33.440 --> 00:07:34.710 align:start position:0%
been annoying to classify but is very
high<00:07:33.680><c> value.</c><00:07:34.000><c> So</c><00:07:34.160><c> I'm</c><00:07:34.319><c> going</c><00:07:34.400><c> to</c><00:07:34.479><c> show</c><00:07:34.560><c> you</c>

00:07:34.710 --> 00:07:34.720 align:start position:0%
high value. So I'm going to show you
 

00:07:34.720 --> 00:07:36.309 align:start position:0%
high value. So I'm going to show you
those<00:07:34.960><c> use</c><00:07:35.120><c> cases</c><00:07:35.440><c> and</c><00:07:35.680><c> hopefully</c><00:07:35.919><c> this</c><00:07:36.160><c> will</c>

00:07:36.309 --> 00:07:36.319 align:start position:0%
those use cases and hopefully this will
 

00:07:36.319 --> 00:07:39.589 align:start position:0%
those use cases and hopefully this will
inspire<00:07:36.880><c> you</c><00:07:37.520><c> about</c><00:07:37.840><c> how</c><00:07:38.080><c> you</c><00:07:38.240><c> can</c><00:07:38.479><c> use</c><00:07:38.960><c> Jev.</c>

00:07:39.589 --> 00:07:39.599 align:start position:0%
inspire you about how you can use Jev.
 

00:07:39.599 --> 00:07:41.189 align:start position:0%
inspire you about how you can use Jev.
Okay.<00:07:39.840><c> So</c><00:07:40.000><c> I'm</c><00:07:40.160><c> going</c><00:07:40.240><c> to</c><00:07:40.319><c> pull</c><00:07:40.479><c> up</c><00:07:40.560><c> Codeex</c><00:07:41.039><c> and</c>

00:07:41.189 --> 00:07:41.199 align:start position:0%
Okay. So I'm going to pull up Codeex and
 

00:07:41.199 --> 00:07:44.150 align:start position:0%
Okay. So I'm going to pull up Codeex and
show<00:07:41.360><c> you</c><00:07:41.840><c> like</c><00:07:42.160><c> two</c><00:07:42.400><c> or</c><00:07:42.639><c> three</c><00:07:43.039><c> examples</c><00:07:43.840><c> that</c>

00:07:44.150 --> 00:07:44.160 align:start position:0%
show you like two or three examples that
 

00:07:44.160 --> 00:07:46.629 align:start position:0%
show you like two or three examples that
are<00:07:44.479><c> super</c><00:07:44.880><c> simple</c><00:07:45.120><c> to</c><00:07:45.360><c> run,</c><00:07:46.080><c> incredibly</c>

00:07:46.629 --> 00:07:46.639 align:start position:0%
are super simple to run, incredibly
 

00:07:46.639 --> 00:07:49.430 align:start position:0%
are super simple to run, incredibly
cheap,<00:07:46.880><c> and</c><00:07:47.120><c> incredibly</c><00:07:47.599><c> powerful.</c><00:07:48.720><c> This</c><00:07:49.199><c> is</c>

00:07:49.430 --> 00:07:49.440 align:start position:0%
cheap, and incredibly powerful. This is
 

00:07:49.440 --> 00:07:52.950 align:start position:0%
cheap, and incredibly powerful. This is
one<00:07:50.400><c> CTO's,</c><00:07:51.120><c> VPs</c><00:07:51.520><c> of</c><00:07:51.680><c> product,</c><00:07:52.319><c> V,</c><00:07:52.639><c> you</c><00:07:52.800><c> know,</c>

00:07:52.950 --> 00:07:52.960 align:start position:0%
one CTO's, VPs of product, V, you know,
 

00:07:52.960 --> 00:07:55.110 align:start position:0%
one CTO's, VPs of product, V, you know,
chief<00:07:53.199><c> product</c><00:07:53.520><c> officers,</c><00:07:54.000><c> listen</c><00:07:54.240><c> up.</c><00:07:54.879><c> This</c>

00:07:55.110 --> 00:07:55.120 align:start position:0%
chief product officers, listen up. This
 

00:07:55.120 --> 00:07:56.710 align:start position:0%
chief product officers, listen up. This
is<00:07:55.199><c> the</c><00:07:55.360><c> one</c><00:07:55.520><c> that</c><00:07:55.759><c> three</c><00:07:56.000><c> years</c><00:07:56.160><c> ago</c><00:07:56.400><c> I</c><00:07:56.560><c> would</c>

00:07:56.710 --> 00:07:56.720 align:start position:0%
is the one that three years ago I would
 

00:07:56.720 --> 00:08:00.309 align:start position:0%
is the one that three years ago I would
have<00:07:56.800><c> paid</c><00:07:57.199><c> truly</c><00:07:57.759><c> $100,000</c><00:07:58.479><c> for.</c><00:07:59.280><c> So</c><00:07:59.599><c> what</c><00:07:59.919><c> I</c>

00:08:00.309 --> 00:08:00.319 align:start position:0%
have paid truly $100,000 for. So what I
 

00:08:00.319 --> 00:08:05.430 align:start position:0%
have paid truly $100,000 for. So what I
had<00:08:01.039><c> Jev</c><00:08:01.520><c> do</c><00:08:02.479><c> is</c><00:08:02.800><c> look</c><00:08:02.960><c> at</c><00:08:03.520><c> thousands</c><00:08:04.000><c> of</c><00:08:04.160><c> PRs.</c>

00:08:05.430 --> 00:08:05.440 align:start position:0%
had Jev do is look at thousands of PRs.
 

00:08:05.440 --> 00:08:08.070 align:start position:0%
had Jev do is look at thousands of PRs.
I<00:08:05.680><c> got</c><00:08:05.919><c> PRs.</c><00:08:06.879><c> I</c><00:08:07.120><c> have</c><00:08:07.280><c> connection</c><00:08:07.599><c> to</c><00:08:07.919><c> to</c>

00:08:08.070 --> 00:08:08.080 align:start position:0%
I got PRs. I have connection to to
 

00:08:08.080 --> 00:08:11.110 align:start position:0%
I got PRs. I have connection to to
GitHub.<00:08:09.039><c> Pull</c><00:08:09.360><c> every</c><00:08:09.599><c> single</c><00:08:09.840><c> PR.</c><00:08:10.800><c> And</c><00:08:10.960><c> then</c>

00:08:11.110 --> 00:08:11.120 align:start position:0%
GitHub. Pull every single PR. And then
 

00:08:11.120 --> 00:08:12.790 align:start position:0%
GitHub. Pull every single PR. And then
what<00:08:11.360><c> I</c><00:08:11.520><c> had</c><00:08:11.680><c> it</c><00:08:11.840><c> do,</c><00:08:12.000><c> which</c><00:08:12.240><c> would</c><00:08:12.400><c> have</c><00:08:12.560><c> been</c>

00:08:12.790 --> 00:08:12.800 align:start position:0%
what I had it do, which would have been
 

00:08:12.800 --> 00:08:17.189 align:start position:0%
what I had it do, which would have been
so<00:08:13.199><c> impractical</c><00:08:13.919><c> in</c><00:08:14.240><c> the</c><00:08:14.400><c> past,</c><00:08:15.680><c> is</c><00:08:15.919><c> I</c><00:08:16.160><c> said</c>

00:08:17.189 --> 00:08:17.199 align:start position:0%
so impractical in the past, is I said
 

00:08:17.199 --> 00:08:21.510 align:start position:0%
so impractical in the past, is I said
categorize<00:08:18.319><c> all</c><00:08:18.479><c> the</c><00:08:18.720><c> PRs.</c><00:08:19.759><c> And</c><00:08:20.000><c> so</c><00:08:20.560><c> use</c><00:08:20.879><c> Jev</c>

00:08:21.510 --> 00:08:21.520 align:start position:0%
categorize all the PRs. And so use Jev
 

00:08:21.520 --> 00:08:24.629 align:start position:0%
categorize all the PRs. And so use Jev
to<00:08:22.479><c> do</c><00:08:22.720><c> pair-wise</c><00:08:23.520><c> relations.</c><00:08:24.160><c> And</c><00:08:24.319><c> so</c><00:08:24.479><c> this</c>

00:08:24.629 --> 00:08:24.639 align:start position:0%
to do pair-wise relations. And so this
 

00:08:24.639 --> 00:08:26.070 align:start position:0%
to do pair-wise relations. And so this
is<00:08:24.720><c> something</c><00:08:24.879><c> that</c><00:08:25.039><c> I</c><00:08:25.199><c> found</c><00:08:25.360><c> Jev</c><00:08:25.680><c> is</c><00:08:25.919><c> really</c>

00:08:26.070 --> 00:08:26.080 align:start position:0%
is something that I found Jev is really
 

00:08:26.080 --> 00:08:29.270 align:start position:0%
is something that I found Jev is really
good<00:08:26.240><c> at</c><00:08:26.560><c> is</c><00:08:26.960><c> compare</c><00:08:27.199><c> like</c><00:08:27.440><c> P</c><00:08:28.000><c> to</c><00:08:28.160><c> PRB</c><00:08:29.039><c> and</c>

00:08:29.270 --> 00:08:29.280 align:start position:0%
good at is compare like P to PRB and
 

00:08:29.280 --> 00:08:31.110 align:start position:0%
good at is compare like P to PRB and
say,<00:08:29.520><c> are</c><00:08:29.759><c> you</c><00:08:29.919><c> the</c><00:08:30.160><c> same?</c><00:08:30.639><c> Are</c><00:08:30.800><c> you</c><00:08:30.960><c> working</c>

00:08:31.110 --> 00:08:31.120 align:start position:0%
say, are you the same? Are you working
 

00:08:31.120 --> 00:08:33.350 align:start position:0%
say, are you the same? Are you working
on<00:08:31.280><c> the</c><00:08:31.440><c> same</c><00:08:31.680><c> thematic</c><00:08:32.159><c> area</c><00:08:32.479><c> or</c><00:08:32.800><c> not?</c><00:08:33.039><c> Again,</c>

00:08:33.350 --> 00:08:33.360 align:start position:0%
on the same thematic area or not? Again,
 

00:08:33.360 --> 00:08:34.630 align:start position:0%
on the same thematic area or not? Again,
Jev's<00:08:33.760><c> not</c><00:08:33.839><c> going</c><00:08:33.919><c> to</c><00:08:34.000><c> tell</c><00:08:34.080><c> you</c><00:08:34.240><c> what</c><00:08:34.399><c> the</c>

00:08:34.630 --> 00:08:34.640 align:start position:0%
Jev's not going to tell you what the
 

00:08:34.640 --> 00:08:36.630 align:start position:0%
Jev's not going to tell you what the
thematic<00:08:35.039><c> area</c><00:08:35.360><c> is</c><00:08:35.680><c> unless</c><00:08:36.000><c> you</c><00:08:36.159><c> give</c><00:08:36.320><c> it</c>

00:08:36.630 --> 00:08:36.640 align:start position:0%
thematic area is unless you give it
 

00:08:36.640 --> 00:08:38.709 align:start position:0%
thematic area is unless you give it
choices.<00:08:37.360><c> is</c><00:08:37.760><c> it's</c><00:08:37.839><c> going</c><00:08:37.919><c> to</c><00:08:38.000><c> say</c><00:08:38.159><c> like</c><00:08:38.479><c> yes</c>

00:08:38.709 --> 00:08:38.719 align:start position:0%
choices. is it's going to say like yes
 

00:08:38.719 --> 00:08:41.029 align:start position:0%
choices. is it's going to say like yes
these<00:08:38.959><c> two</c><00:08:39.200><c> are</c><00:08:39.360><c> related</c><00:08:39.680><c> or</c><00:08:40.000><c> no</c><00:08:40.159><c> they're</c><00:08:40.399><c> not</c>

00:08:41.029 --> 00:08:41.039 align:start position:0%
these two are related or no they're not
 

00:08:41.039 --> 00:08:42.389 align:start position:0%
these two are related or no they're not
and<00:08:41.200><c> I've</c><00:08:41.440><c> been</c><00:08:41.519><c> doing</c><00:08:41.680><c> this</c><00:08:41.839><c> a</c><00:08:42.000><c> lot</c><00:08:42.080><c> where</c><00:08:42.240><c> I'm</c>

00:08:42.389 --> 00:08:42.399 align:start position:0%
and I've been doing this a lot where I'm
 

00:08:42.399 --> 00:08:43.990 align:start position:0%
and I've been doing this a lot where I'm
taking<00:08:42.640><c> vast</c><00:08:42.959><c> amounts</c><00:08:43.279><c> of</c><00:08:43.360><c> data</c><00:08:43.599><c> and</c><00:08:43.839><c> I'm</c>

00:08:43.990 --> 00:08:44.000 align:start position:0%
taking vast amounts of data and I'm
 

00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:45.910 align:start position:0%
taking vast amounts of data and I'm
saying<00:08:44.159><c> like</c><00:08:44.399><c> yes</c><00:08:44.640><c> related</c><00:08:45.040><c> not</c><00:08:45.279><c> related</c><00:08:45.680><c> yes</c>

00:08:45.910 --> 00:08:45.920 align:start position:0%
saying like yes related not related yes
 

00:08:45.920 --> 00:08:48.230 align:start position:0%
saying like yes related not related yes
related<00:08:46.480><c> not</c><00:08:46.640><c> related</c><00:08:47.200><c> and</c><00:08:47.440><c> it's</c><00:08:47.760><c> doing</c>

00:08:48.230 --> 00:08:48.240 align:start position:0%
related not related and it's doing
 

00:08:48.240 --> 00:08:50.710 align:start position:0%
related not related and it's doing
clustering<00:08:49.040><c> which</c><00:08:49.360><c> I</c><00:08:49.600><c> find</c><00:08:49.839><c> very</c><00:08:50.160><c> very</c><00:08:50.480><c> useful</c>

00:08:50.710 --> 00:08:50.720 align:start position:0%
clustering which I find very very useful
 

00:08:50.720 --> 00:08:54.389 align:start position:0%
clustering which I find very very useful
so<00:08:51.120><c> I</c><00:08:51.360><c> create</c><00:08:51.680><c> these</c><00:08:52.000><c> clusters</c><00:08:52.720><c> of</c><00:08:53.279><c> data</c><00:08:53.600><c> sets</c>

00:08:54.389 --> 00:08:54.399 align:start position:0%
so I create these clusters of data sets
 

00:08:54.399 --> 00:08:57.110 align:start position:0%
so I create these clusters of data sets
and<00:08:54.640><c> that's</c><00:08:54.959><c> what</c><00:08:55.600><c> Jev</c><00:08:56.000><c> did</c><00:08:56.480><c> and</c><00:08:56.640><c> then</c><00:08:56.800><c> I</c><00:08:56.959><c> used</c>

00:08:57.110 --> 00:08:57.120 align:start position:0%
and that's what Jev did and then I used
 

00:08:57.120 --> 00:08:59.670 align:start position:0%
and that's what Jev did and then I used
a<00:08:57.440><c> really</c><00:08:57.839><c> cheap</c><00:08:58.160><c> model</c><00:08:58.480><c> I</c><00:08:58.640><c> use</c><00:08:58.800><c> Gemini</c><00:08:59.279><c> flash</c>

00:08:59.670 --> 00:08:59.680 align:start position:0%
a really cheap model I use Gemini flash
 

00:08:59.680 --> 00:09:02.150 align:start position:0%
a really cheap model I use Gemini flash
light<00:09:00.399><c> to</c><00:09:00.640><c> then</c><00:09:00.880><c> take</c><00:09:01.040><c> those</c><00:09:01.279><c> clusters</c><00:09:01.839><c> and</c>

00:09:02.150 --> 00:09:02.160 align:start position:0%
light to then take those clusters and
 

00:09:02.160 --> 00:09:06.070 align:start position:0%
light to then take those clusters and
categorize<00:09:02.800><c> them</c><00:09:04.160><c> and</c><00:09:05.040><c> I</c><00:09:05.279><c> first</c><00:09:05.519><c> ran</c><00:09:05.760><c> it</c><00:09:05.920><c> on</c>

00:09:06.070 --> 00:09:06.080 align:start position:0%
categorize them and I first ran it on
 

00:09:06.080 --> 00:09:07.750 align:start position:0%
categorize them and I first ran it on
our<00:09:06.240><c> marketing</c><00:09:06.560><c> site</c><00:09:07.120><c> where</c><00:09:07.360><c> we</c><00:09:07.519><c> only</c><00:09:07.680><c> have</c>

00:09:07.750 --> 00:09:07.760 align:start position:0%
our marketing site where we only have
 

00:09:07.760 --> 00:09:11.590 align:start position:0%
our marketing site where we only have
like<00:09:08.000><c> 112</c><00:09:08.560><c> PRs.</c><00:09:09.279><c> It</c><00:09:09.519><c> cost</c><00:09:09.760><c> me</c><00:09:10.080><c> 1.1</c><00:09:10.959><c> cent.</c><00:09:11.440><c> I</c>

00:09:11.590 --> 00:09:11.600 align:start position:0%
like 112 PRs. It cost me 1.1 cent. I
 

00:09:11.600 --> 00:09:13.590 align:start position:0%
like 112 PRs. It cost me 1.1 cent. I
guess<00:09:11.760><c> they</c><00:09:12.000><c> wouldn't</c><00:09:12.160><c> round</c><00:09:12.399><c> down</c><00:09:12.640><c> that.1</c>

00:09:13.590 --> 00:09:13.600 align:start position:0%
guess they wouldn't round down that.1
 

00:09:13.600 --> 00:09:16.470 align:start position:0%
guess they wouldn't round down that.1
penny.<00:09:14.480><c> And</c><00:09:14.720><c> you</c><00:09:14.959><c> can</c><00:09:15.120><c> see</c><00:09:15.360><c> here,</c><00:09:15.760><c> it</c><00:09:16.000><c> lets</c><00:09:16.240><c> me</c>

00:09:16.470 --> 00:09:16.480 align:start position:0%
penny. And you can see here, it lets me
 

00:09:16.480 --> 00:09:18.389 align:start position:0%
penny. And you can see here, it lets me
see<00:09:16.800><c> how</c><00:09:17.040><c> much</c><00:09:17.200><c> my</c><00:09:17.440><c> work</c><00:09:17.600><c> is</c><00:09:17.920><c> related</c><00:09:18.160><c> to</c>

00:09:18.389 --> 00:09:18.399 align:start position:0%
see how much my work is related to
 

00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:20.790 align:start position:0%
see how much my work is related to
maintenance,<00:09:19.040><c> content,</c><00:09:19.760><c> tools,</c><00:09:20.399><c> site,</c><00:09:20.640><c> and</c>

00:09:20.790 --> 00:09:20.800 align:start position:0%
maintenance, content, tools, site, and
 

00:09:20.800 --> 00:09:23.590 align:start position:0%
maintenance, content, tools, site, and
conversion<00:09:21.279><c> services</c><00:09:21.839><c> or</c><00:09:22.080><c> docs.</c><00:09:23.279><c> Super</c>

00:09:23.590 --> 00:09:23.600 align:start position:0%
conversion services or docs. Super
 

00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:26.470 align:start position:0%
conversion services or docs. Super
useful.<00:09:24.320><c> Again,</c><00:09:24.640><c> it</c><00:09:24.800><c> ran</c><00:09:25.200><c> very,</c><00:09:25.600><c> very,</c><00:09:26.080><c> very</c>

00:09:26.470 --> 00:09:26.480 align:start position:0%
useful. Again, it ran very, very, very
 

00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:28.550 align:start position:0%
useful. Again, it ran very, very, very
fast<00:09:26.880><c> and</c><00:09:27.120><c> very</c><00:09:27.440><c> cheap.</c><00:09:27.839><c> But</c><00:09:28.000><c> then</c><00:09:28.160><c> I</c><00:09:28.320><c> ran</c><00:09:28.480><c> it</c>

00:09:28.550 --> 00:09:28.560 align:start position:0%
fast and very cheap. But then I ran it
 

00:09:28.560 --> 00:09:30.470 align:start position:0%
fast and very cheap. But then I ran it
on<00:09:28.720><c> my</c><00:09:28.800><c> chat</c><00:09:29.040><c> PRD</c><00:09:29.440><c> app,</c><00:09:29.600><c> which</c><00:09:29.760><c> has</c><00:09:29.920><c> about</c>

00:09:30.470 --> 00:09:30.480 align:start position:0%
on my chat PRD app, which has about
 

00:09:30.480 --> 00:09:33.190 align:start position:0%
on my chat PRD app, which has about
2,000<00:09:31.120><c> PRs</c><00:09:31.519><c> on</c><00:09:31.680><c> it</c><00:09:31.839><c> to</c><00:09:32.080><c> date</c><00:09:32.320><c> in</c><00:09:32.560><c> this</c><00:09:32.800><c> calendar</c>

00:09:33.190 --> 00:09:33.200 align:start position:0%
2,000 PRs on it to date in this calendar
 

00:09:33.200 --> 00:09:35.990 align:start position:0%
2,000 PRs on it to date in this calendar
year.<00:09:33.920><c> because</c><00:09:34.320><c> it</c><00:09:34.560><c> has</c><00:09:34.800><c> a</c><00:09:35.040><c> lot</c><00:09:35.120><c> more</c><00:09:35.360><c> PRs.</c><00:09:35.839><c> It</c>

00:09:35.990 --> 00:09:36.000 align:start position:0%
year. because it has a lot more PRs. It
 

00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:37.910 align:start position:0%
year. because it has a lot more PRs. It
cost<00:09:36.160><c> me</c><00:09:36.320><c> a</c><00:09:36.480><c> lot</c><00:09:36.640><c> more</c><00:09:36.800><c> money.</c><00:09:37.120><c> And</c><00:09:37.279><c> by</c><00:09:37.519><c> a</c><00:09:37.760><c> lot</c>

00:09:37.910 --> 00:09:37.920 align:start position:0%
cost me a lot more money. And by a lot
 

00:09:37.920 --> 00:09:41.430 align:start position:0%
cost me a lot more money. And by a lot
more<00:09:38.080><c> money,</c><00:09:38.399><c> I</c><00:09:38.640><c> mean</c><00:09:39.600><c> nine</c><00:09:40.560><c> whole</c><00:09:40.880><c> cents.</c><00:09:41.279><c> It</c>

00:09:41.430 --> 00:09:41.440 align:start position:0%
more money, I mean nine whole cents. It
 

00:09:41.440 --> 00:09:43.509 align:start position:0%
more money, I mean nine whole cents. It
cost<00:09:41.600><c> me</c><00:09:41.839><c> 9</c><00:09:42.080><c> cents</c><00:09:42.399><c> to</c><00:09:42.640><c> do</c><00:09:42.800><c> this.</c><00:09:43.040><c> It</c><00:09:43.279><c> took</c>

00:09:43.509 --> 00:09:43.519 align:start position:0%
cost me 9 cents to do this. It took
 

00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:46.310 align:start position:0%
cost me 9 cents to do this. It took
probably<00:09:43.920><c> about</c><00:09:44.640><c> 2</c><00:09:44.880><c> minutes.</c><00:09:45.680><c> What</c><00:09:45.920><c> it</c><00:09:46.080><c> did</c><00:09:46.160><c> is</c>

00:09:46.310 --> 00:09:46.320 align:start position:0%
probably about 2 minutes. What it did is
 

00:09:46.320 --> 00:09:51.269 align:start position:0%
probably about 2 minutes. What it did is
it<00:09:46.560><c> analyzed</c><00:09:47.200><c> 1,700</c><00:09:48.240><c> PRs.</c><00:09:49.360><c> It</c><00:09:49.600><c> did</c><00:09:50.399><c> 17</c><00:09:50.800><c> found</c>

00:09:51.269 --> 00:09:51.279 align:start position:0%
it analyzed 1,700 PRs. It did 17 found
 

00:09:51.279 --> 00:09:52.949 align:start position:0%
it analyzed 1,700 PRs. It did 17 found
17,000

00:09:52.949 --> 00:09:52.959 align:start position:0%
17,000
 

00:09:52.959 --> 00:09:55.269 align:start position:0%
17,000
pairs<00:09:53.519><c> in</c><00:09:53.760><c> those</c><00:09:53.920><c> PRs</c><00:09:54.399><c> of</c><00:09:54.560><c> things</c><00:09:54.800><c> that</c><00:09:55.040><c> could</c>

00:09:55.269 --> 00:09:55.279 align:start position:0%
pairs in those PRs of things that could
 

00:09:55.279 --> 00:09:58.070 align:start position:0%
pairs in those PRs of things that could
be<00:09:56.000><c> matched.</c><00:09:56.560><c> And</c><00:09:56.720><c> then</c><00:09:56.959><c> the</c><00:09:57.200><c> themes</c><00:09:57.760><c> were</c>

00:09:58.070 --> 00:09:58.080 align:start position:0%
be matched. And then the themes were
 

00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:01.829 align:start position:0%
be matched. And then the themes were
labeled<00:09:58.640><c> by</c><00:09:58.800><c> Gemini</c><00:09:59.360><c> Flash</c><00:09:59.920><c> Light.</c><00:10:01.120><c> And</c><00:10:01.440><c> it</c>

00:10:01.829 --> 00:10:01.839 align:start position:0%
labeled by Gemini Flash Light. And it
 

00:10:01.839 --> 00:10:04.949 align:start position:0%
labeled by Gemini Flash Light. And it
pulled<00:10:02.959><c> all</c><00:10:03.440><c> of</c><00:10:03.839><c> the</c><00:10:04.080><c> data</c><00:10:04.320><c> out.</c><00:10:04.640><c> I</c><00:10:04.800><c> mean,</c>

00:10:04.949 --> 00:10:04.959 align:start position:0%
pulled all of the data out. I mean,
 

00:10:04.959 --> 00:10:06.630 align:start position:0%
pulled all of the data out. I mean,
again,

00:10:06.630 --> 00:10:06.640 align:start position:0%
again,
 

00:10:06.640 --> 00:10:10.070 align:start position:0%
again,
CTO's,<00:10:07.519><c> CEOs,</c><00:10:08.480><c> like</c><00:10:09.200><c> I</c><00:10:09.440><c> know</c><00:10:09.600><c> you're</c><00:10:09.839><c> asked</c>

00:10:10.070 --> 00:10:10.080 align:start position:0%
CTO's, CEOs, like I know you're asked
 

00:10:10.080 --> 00:10:11.990 align:start position:0%
CTO's, CEOs, like I know you're asked
this<00:10:10.320><c> by</c><00:10:10.480><c> the</c><00:10:10.720><c> board</c><00:10:10.959><c> and</c><00:10:11.200><c> by</c><00:10:11.360><c> your</c><00:10:11.600><c> team</c><00:10:11.760><c> and</c>

00:10:11.990 --> 00:10:12.000 align:start position:0%
this by the board and by your team and
 

00:10:12.000 --> 00:10:13.750 align:start position:0%
this by the board and by your team and
by<00:10:12.160><c> your</c><00:10:12.320><c> boss</c><00:10:12.640><c> all</c><00:10:12.880><c> the</c><00:10:13.040><c> time,</c><00:10:13.279><c> like</c><00:10:13.519><c> what</c>

00:10:13.750 --> 00:10:13.760 align:start position:0%
by your boss all the time, like what
 

00:10:13.760 --> 00:10:16.470 align:start position:0%
by your boss all the time, like what
percentage<00:10:14.160><c> of</c><00:10:14.399><c> work</c><00:10:14.640><c> is</c><00:10:14.880><c> going</c><00:10:15.839><c> to</c><00:10:16.160><c> what</c>

00:10:16.470 --> 00:10:16.480 align:start position:0%
percentage of work is going to what
 

00:10:16.480 --> 00:10:17.750 align:start position:0%
percentage of work is going to what
initiatives?<00:10:17.040><c> Like,</c><00:10:17.279><c> tell</c><00:10:17.440><c> me</c><00:10:17.519><c> the</c>

00:10:17.750 --> 00:10:17.760 align:start position:0%
initiatives? Like, tell me the
 

00:10:17.760 --> 00:10:19.350 align:start position:0%
initiatives? Like, tell me the
percentage<00:10:18.079><c> to</c><00:10:18.320><c> tech</c><00:10:18.480><c> debt.</c><00:10:18.800><c> Tell</c><00:10:18.880><c> me</c><00:10:19.040><c> the</c>

00:10:19.350 --> 00:10:19.360 align:start position:0%
percentage to tech debt. Tell me the
 

00:10:19.360 --> 00:10:20.710 align:start position:0%
percentage to tech debt. Tell me the
percentage<00:10:19.680><c> to</c><00:10:19.920><c> this</c><00:10:20.079><c> product</c><00:10:20.240><c> or</c><00:10:20.480><c> that</c>

00:10:20.710 --> 00:10:20.720 align:start position:0%
percentage to this product or that
 

00:10:20.720 --> 00:10:23.110 align:start position:0%
percentage to this product or that
product.<00:10:21.360><c> And</c><00:10:21.600><c> you</c><00:10:21.839><c> can</c><00:10:22.000><c> see</c><00:10:22.160><c> here</c><00:10:22.720><c> it</c><00:10:22.880><c> got</c>

00:10:23.110 --> 00:10:23.120 align:start position:0%
product. And you can see here it got
 

00:10:23.120 --> 00:10:25.269 align:start position:0%
product. And you can see here it got
down.<00:10:23.360><c> It</c><00:10:23.519><c> excluded</c><00:10:23.839><c> our</c><00:10:24.079><c> docs</c><00:10:24.560><c> PRs</c><00:10:25.040><c> because</c>

00:10:25.269 --> 00:10:25.279 align:start position:0%
down. It excluded our docs PRs because
 

00:10:25.279 --> 00:10:27.829 align:start position:0%
down. It excluded our docs PRs because
those<00:10:25.600><c> are</c><00:10:25.760><c> completely</c><00:10:26.079><c> separate.</c><00:10:27.440><c> almost</c>

00:10:27.829 --> 00:10:27.839 align:start position:0%
those are completely separate. almost
 

00:10:27.839 --> 00:10:30.389 align:start position:0%
those are completely separate. almost
30%<00:10:28.720><c> of</c><00:10:29.040><c> the</c><00:10:29.200><c> effort</c><00:10:29.519><c> the</c><00:10:29.680><c> PRs</c><00:10:30.000><c> that</c><00:10:30.160><c> we</c><00:10:30.240><c> do</c><00:10:30.320><c> at</c>

00:10:30.389 --> 00:10:30.399 align:start position:0%
30% of the effort the PRs that we do at
 

00:10:30.399 --> 00:10:32.949 align:start position:0%
30% of the effort the PRs that we do at
Chat<00:10:30.720><c> Pured</c><00:10:31.440><c> are</c><00:10:31.519><c> around</c><00:10:31.839><c> platform</c><00:10:32.640><c> security</c>

00:10:32.949 --> 00:10:32.959 align:start position:0%
Chat Pured are around platform security
 

00:10:32.959 --> 00:10:34.630 align:start position:0%
Chat Pured are around platform security
and<00:10:33.200><c> infrastructure.</c><00:10:33.920><c> on</c><00:10:34.079><c> being</c><00:10:34.240><c> a</c><00:10:34.399><c> good</c>

00:10:34.630 --> 00:10:34.640 align:start position:0%
and infrastructure. on being a good
 

00:10:34.640 --> 00:10:36.389 align:start position:0%
and infrastructure. on being a good
citizen<00:10:34.959><c> and</c><00:10:35.279><c> investing</c><00:10:35.680><c> in</c><00:10:35.920><c> security</c>

00:10:36.389 --> 00:10:36.399 align:start position:0%
citizen and investing in security
 

00:10:36.399 --> 00:10:38.790 align:start position:0%
citizen and investing in security
performance<00:10:37.040><c> and</c><00:10:37.279><c> infrastructure</c><00:10:38.320><c> and</c><00:10:38.560><c> then</c>

00:10:38.790 --> 00:10:38.800 align:start position:0%
performance and infrastructure and then
 

00:10:38.800 --> 00:10:40.710 align:start position:0%
performance and infrastructure and then
of<00:10:38.959><c> course</c><00:10:39.120><c> because</c><00:10:39.360><c> we're</c><00:10:39.680><c> a</c><00:10:39.839><c> chatbot</c><00:10:40.480><c> a</c>

00:10:40.710 --> 00:10:40.720 align:start position:0%
of course because we're a chatbot a
 

00:10:40.720 --> 00:10:43.670 align:start position:0%
of course because we're a chatbot a
conversational<00:10:41.360><c> AI</c><00:10:42.240><c> reliability</c><00:10:43.120><c> and</c><00:10:43.360><c> then</c>

00:10:43.670 --> 00:10:43.680 align:start position:0%
conversational AI reliability and then
 

00:10:43.680 --> 00:10:45.590 align:start position:0%
conversational AI reliability and then
some<00:10:43.920><c> product</c><00:10:44.240><c> areas</c><00:10:44.560><c> that</c><00:10:44.720><c> we</c><00:10:44.880><c> invest</c><00:10:45.120><c> in</c><00:10:45.360><c> are</c>

00:10:45.590 --> 00:10:45.600 align:start position:0%
some product areas that we invest in are
 

00:10:45.600 --> 00:10:47.509 align:start position:0%
some product areas that we invest in are
like<00:10:45.839><c> data</c><00:10:46.160><c> and</c><00:10:46.399><c> integrations</c><00:10:47.120><c> document</c>

00:10:47.509 --> 00:10:47.519 align:start position:0%
like data and integrations document
 

00:10:47.519 --> 00:10:50.150 align:start position:0%
like data and integrations document
editing<00:10:47.839><c> and</c><00:10:48.079><c> prototyping</c><00:10:48.800><c> which</c><00:10:49.040><c> is</c><00:10:49.120><c> new</c><00:10:49.920><c> and</c>

00:10:50.150 --> 00:10:50.160 align:start position:0%
editing and prototyping which is new and
 

00:10:50.160 --> 00:10:54.710 align:start position:0%
editing and prototyping which is new and
so<00:10:51.040><c> this</c><00:10:51.360><c> was</c><00:10:51.760><c> so</c><00:10:52.079><c> cheap</c><00:10:52.560><c> so</c><00:10:52.880><c> fast</c><00:10:53.760><c> it</c><00:10:54.000><c> is</c>

00:10:54.710 --> 00:10:54.720 align:start position:0%
so this was so cheap so fast it is
 

00:10:54.720 --> 00:10:56.790 align:start position:0%
so this was so cheap so fast it is
accurate<00:10:55.200><c> like</c><00:10:55.440><c> I</c><00:10:55.600><c> can</c><00:10:55.760><c> just</c><00:10:56.000><c> tell</c><00:10:56.160><c> you</c><00:10:56.480><c> yes</c>

00:10:56.790 --> 00:10:56.800 align:start position:0%
accurate like I can just tell you yes
 

00:10:56.800 --> 00:10:58.310 align:start position:0%
accurate like I can just tell you yes
this<00:10:56.959><c> is</c><00:10:57.120><c> where</c><00:10:57.279><c> we're</c><00:10:57.519><c> investing</c><00:10:57.839><c> our</c><00:10:58.160><c> time</c>

00:10:58.310 --> 00:10:58.320 align:start position:0%
this is where we're investing our time
 

00:10:58.320 --> 00:11:00.710 align:start position:0%
this is where we're investing our time
and<00:10:58.560><c> you</c><00:10:58.720><c> can</c><00:10:58.800><c> even</c><00:10:59.040><c> see</c><00:10:59.600><c> as</c><00:10:59.839><c> we</c><00:11:00.079><c> invest</c><00:11:00.480><c> more</c>

00:11:00.710 --> 00:11:00.720 align:start position:0%
and you can even see as we invest more
 

00:11:00.720 --> 00:11:03.590 align:start position:0%
and you can even see as we invest more
in<00:11:01.040><c> different</c><00:11:01.440><c> things</c><00:11:02.800><c> over</c><00:11:03.040><c> the</c><00:11:03.200><c> last</c><00:11:03.360><c> couple</c>

00:11:03.590 --> 00:11:03.600 align:start position:0%
in different things over the last couple
 

00:11:03.600 --> 00:11:05.990 align:start position:0%
in different things over the last couple
months<00:11:03.839><c> it</c><00:11:04.079><c> goes</c><00:11:04.320><c> up.</c><00:11:04.720><c> And</c><00:11:04.880><c> so</c><00:11:05.120><c> this</c><00:11:05.360><c> is</c><00:11:05.600><c> just</c>

00:11:05.990 --> 00:11:06.000 align:start position:0%
months it goes up. And so this is just
 

00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:08.630 align:start position:0%
months it goes up. And so this is just
an<00:11:06.240><c> example</c><00:11:06.560><c> of</c><00:11:06.800><c> how</c><00:11:07.040><c> powerful,</c><00:11:07.519><c> cheap,</c><00:11:08.399><c> and</c>

00:11:08.630 --> 00:11:08.640 align:start position:0%
an example of how powerful, cheap, and
 

00:11:08.640 --> 00:11:13.030 align:start position:0%
an example of how powerful, cheap, and
good<00:11:09.279><c> Jev</c><00:11:09.680><c> can</c><00:11:09.839><c> be</c><00:11:10.240><c> on</c><00:11:10.959><c> large</c><00:11:11.760><c> data</c><00:11:12.079><c> sets.</c><00:11:12.880><c> And</c>

00:11:13.030 --> 00:11:13.040 align:start position:0%
good Jev can be on large data sets. And
 

00:11:13.040 --> 00:11:15.110 align:start position:0%
good Jev can be on large data sets. And
then<00:11:13.200><c> I</c><00:11:13.360><c> want</c><00:11:13.440><c> to</c><00:11:13.600><c> give</c><00:11:13.839><c> you</c><00:11:14.079><c> all</c><00:11:14.480><c> one</c><00:11:14.800><c> that</c>

00:11:15.110 --> 00:11:15.120 align:start position:0%
then I want to give you all one that
 

00:11:15.120 --> 00:11:17.750 align:start position:0%
then I want to give you all one that
even<00:11:15.360><c> if</c><00:11:15.519><c> you</c><00:11:15.680><c> don't</c><00:11:15.920><c> have</c><00:11:16.079><c> like</c><00:11:16.320><c> a</c><00:11:16.560><c> big</c><00:11:16.800><c> repo</c>

00:11:17.750 --> 00:11:17.760 align:start position:0%
even if you don't have like a big repo
 

00:11:17.760 --> 00:11:20.310 align:start position:0%
even if you don't have like a big repo
with<00:11:18.079><c> PRs</c><00:11:18.640><c> everywhere</c><00:11:19.279><c> that</c><00:11:19.519><c> you</c><00:11:19.760><c> can</c><00:11:19.920><c> run,</c>

00:11:20.310 --> 00:11:20.320 align:start position:0%
with PRs everywhere that you can run,
 

00:11:20.320 --> 00:11:23.590 align:start position:0%
with PRs everywhere that you can run,
which<00:11:20.560><c> is</c><00:11:20.720><c> you</c><00:11:20.959><c> can</c><00:11:21.120><c> run</c><00:11:21.360><c> this</c><00:11:22.240><c> on</c><00:11:22.880><c> your</c><00:11:23.120><c> local</c>

00:11:23.590 --> 00:11:23.600 align:start position:0%
which is you can run this on your local
 

00:11:23.600 --> 00:11:27.190 align:start position:0%
which is you can run this on your local
cloud<00:11:24.000><c> code</c><00:11:24.800><c> and</c><00:11:25.120><c> codec</c><00:11:25.600><c> sessions.</c><00:11:26.560><c> So</c><00:11:26.880><c> all</c><00:11:27.120><c> of</c>

00:11:27.190 --> 00:11:27.200 align:start position:0%
cloud code and codec sessions. So all of
 

00:11:27.200 --> 00:11:29.110 align:start position:0%
cloud code and codec sessions. So all of
your<00:11:27.440><c> cloud</c><00:11:27.680><c> code</c><00:11:27.839><c> and</c><00:11:28.000><c> codec</c><00:11:28.399><c> sessions</c><00:11:28.880><c> are</c>

00:11:29.110 --> 00:11:29.120 align:start position:0%
your cloud code and codec sessions are
 

00:11:29.120 --> 00:11:31.910 align:start position:0%
your cloud code and codec sessions are
stored<00:11:29.680><c> locally.</c><00:11:30.640><c> And</c><00:11:30.880><c> so</c><00:11:31.120><c> you</c><00:11:31.360><c> can</c><00:11:31.519><c> actually</c>

00:11:31.910 --> 00:11:31.920 align:start position:0%
stored locally. And so you can actually
 

00:11:31.920 --> 00:11:35.670 align:start position:0%
stored locally. And so you can actually
run<00:11:32.480><c> this</c><00:11:32.880><c> analysis</c><00:11:33.760><c> on</c><00:11:34.800><c> everything</c><00:11:35.279><c> stored</c>

00:11:35.670 --> 00:11:35.680 align:start position:0%
run this analysis on everything stored
 

00:11:35.680 --> 00:11:38.310 align:start position:0%
run this analysis on everything stored
on<00:11:36.000><c> your</c><00:11:36.320><c> local</c><00:11:36.800><c> machine.</c><00:11:37.519><c> So</c><00:11:37.680><c> I</c><00:11:37.920><c> did</c><00:11:38.079><c> that</c>

00:11:38.310 --> 00:11:38.320 align:start position:0%
on your local machine. So I did that
 

00:11:38.320 --> 00:11:40.470 align:start position:0%
on your local machine. So I did that
while<00:11:38.640><c> Codex</c><00:11:39.120><c> kicked</c><00:11:39.440><c> off</c><00:11:39.519><c> a</c><00:11:39.760><c> thread</c><00:11:40.079><c> to</c><00:11:40.320><c> do</c>

00:11:40.470 --> 00:11:40.480 align:start position:0%
while Codex kicked off a thread to do
 

00:11:40.480 --> 00:11:44.550 align:start position:0%
while Codex kicked off a thread to do
that.<00:11:41.040><c> And</c><00:11:41.519><c> you</c><00:11:41.920><c> can</c><00:11:42.160><c> see</c><00:11:42.880><c> depending</c><00:11:43.440><c> on</c><00:11:44.320><c> what</c>

00:11:44.550 --> 00:11:44.560 align:start position:0%
that. And you can see depending on what
 

00:11:44.560 --> 00:11:47.670 align:start position:0%
that. And you can see depending on what
you<00:11:44.800><c> count</c><00:11:45.120><c> as</c><00:11:45.519><c> like</c><00:11:45.920><c> effort</c><00:11:46.959><c> how</c><00:11:47.200><c> much</c><00:11:47.360><c> I'm</c>

00:11:47.670 --> 00:11:47.680 align:start position:0%
you count as like effort how much I'm
 

00:11:47.680 --> 00:11:49.750 align:start position:0%
you count as like effort how much I'm
spending<00:11:48.079><c> on</c><00:11:48.399><c> different</c><00:11:48.640><c> things.</c><00:11:48.959><c> So</c><00:11:49.120><c> I</c><00:11:49.360><c> do</c><00:11:49.519><c> a</c>

00:11:49.750 --> 00:11:49.760 align:start position:0%
spending on different things. So I do a
 

00:11:49.760 --> 00:11:51.590 align:start position:0%
spending on different things. So I do a
lot<00:11:49.839><c> of</c><00:11:50.160><c> product</c><00:11:50.480><c> engineering.</c><00:11:50.959><c> And</c><00:11:51.120><c> so</c><00:11:51.279><c> for</c>

00:11:51.590 --> 00:11:51.600 align:start position:0%
lot of product engineering. And so for
 

00:11:51.600 --> 00:11:55.110 align:start position:0%
lot of product engineering. And so for
grouping<00:11:52.000><c> by</c><00:11:52.720><c> user</c><00:11:53.200><c> turns</c><00:11:54.000><c> in</c><00:11:54.240><c> January</c><00:11:54.720><c> I</c><00:11:54.959><c> was</c>

00:11:55.110 --> 00:11:55.120 align:start position:0%
grouping by user turns in January I was
 

00:11:55.120 --> 00:11:58.389 align:start position:0%
grouping by user turns in January I was
almost<00:11:55.600><c> exclusively</c><00:11:56.640><c> doing</c><00:11:57.839><c> engineering</c>

00:11:58.389 --> 00:11:58.399 align:start position:0%
almost exclusively doing engineering
 

00:11:58.399 --> 00:12:00.870 align:start position:0%
almost exclusively doing engineering
tasks<00:11:58.720><c> in</c><00:11:58.959><c> cloud</c><00:11:59.279><c> code</c><00:11:59.440><c> and</c><00:11:59.600><c> codecs.</c><00:12:00.480><c> And</c><00:12:00.640><c> then</c>

00:12:00.870 --> 00:12:00.880 align:start position:0%
tasks in cloud code and codecs. And then
 

00:12:00.880 --> 00:12:03.110 align:start position:0%
tasks in cloud code and codecs. And then
as<00:12:01.120><c> you</c><00:12:01.440><c> kind</c><00:12:01.680><c> of</c><00:12:01.760><c> like</c><00:12:02.079><c> come</c><00:12:02.320><c> into</c><00:12:02.640><c> this</c><00:12:02.880><c> new</c>

00:12:03.110 --> 00:12:03.120 align:start position:0%
as you kind of like come into this new
 

00:12:03.120 --> 00:12:07.269 align:start position:0%
as you kind of like come into this new
world<00:12:03.839><c> now</c><00:12:04.079><c> in</c><00:12:04.320><c> September</c><00:12:05.040><c> less</c><00:12:05.440><c> than</c><00:12:06.320><c> 40%</c><00:12:07.120><c> it</c>

00:12:07.269 --> 00:12:07.279 align:start position:0%
world now in September less than 40% it
 

00:12:07.279 --> 00:12:08.870 align:start position:0%
world now in September less than 40% it
looks<00:12:07.519><c> like</c><00:12:07.680><c> of</c><00:12:07.920><c> my</c><00:12:08.079><c> tasks</c><00:12:08.399><c> are</c><00:12:08.639><c> actually</c>

00:12:08.870 --> 00:12:08.880 align:start position:0%
looks like of my tasks are actually
 

00:12:08.880 --> 00:12:11.430 align:start position:0%
looks like of my tasks are actually
engineering<00:12:09.440><c> tasks.</c><00:12:10.160><c> I'm</c><00:12:10.480><c> doing</c><00:12:10.639><c> a</c><00:12:10.959><c> lot</c><00:12:11.120><c> more</c>

00:12:11.430 --> 00:12:11.440 align:start position:0%
engineering tasks. I'm doing a lot more
 

00:12:11.440 --> 00:12:13.670 align:start position:0%
engineering tasks. I'm doing a lot more
work<00:12:11.760><c> with</c><00:12:12.240><c> agents</c><00:12:12.800><c> which</c><00:12:13.120><c> makes</c><00:12:13.279><c> a</c><00:12:13.519><c> lot</c><00:12:13.600><c> of</c>

00:12:13.670 --> 00:12:13.680 align:start position:0%
work with agents which makes a lot of
 

00:12:13.680 --> 00:12:15.590 align:start position:0%
work with agents which makes a lot of
sense.<00:12:14.320><c> And</c><00:12:14.480><c> then</c><00:12:14.639><c> I'm</c><00:12:14.880><c> doing</c><00:12:15.040><c> a</c><00:12:15.200><c> lot</c><00:12:15.360><c> more</c>

00:12:15.590 --> 00:12:15.600 align:start position:0%
sense. And then I'm doing a lot more
 

00:12:15.600 --> 00:12:17.269 align:start position:0%
sense. And then I'm doing a lot more
like<00:12:15.920><c> publishing</c><00:12:16.399><c> media.</c><00:12:16.800><c> I'm</c><00:12:16.959><c> doing</c><00:12:17.040><c> a</c><00:12:17.200><c> lot</c>

00:12:17.269 --> 00:12:17.279 align:start position:0%
like publishing media. I'm doing a lot
 

00:12:17.279 --> 00:12:19.829 align:start position:0%
like publishing media. I'm doing a lot
of<00:12:17.360><c> our</c><00:12:17.600><c> videos</c><00:12:18.079><c> through.</c><00:12:19.200><c> And</c><00:12:19.360><c> then</c><00:12:19.519><c> you</c><00:12:19.680><c> can</c>

00:12:19.829 --> 00:12:19.839 align:start position:0%
of our videos through. And then you can
 

00:12:19.839 --> 00:12:21.590 align:start position:0%
of our videos through. And then you can
see<00:12:20.160><c> I</c><00:12:20.320><c> have</c><00:12:20.399><c> a</c><00:12:20.560><c> new</c><00:12:20.720><c> business.</c><00:12:21.040><c> So</c><00:12:21.279><c> client</c>

00:12:21.590 --> 00:12:21.600 align:start position:0%
see I have a new business. So client
 

00:12:21.600 --> 00:12:23.990 align:start position:0%
see I have a new business. So client
delivery,<00:12:22.399><c> family</c><00:12:22.720><c> and</c><00:12:22.959><c> personal</c><00:12:23.360><c> stuff.</c><00:12:23.839><c> And</c>

00:12:23.990 --> 00:12:24.000 align:start position:0%
delivery, family and personal stuff. And
 

00:12:24.000 --> 00:12:26.230 align:start position:0%
delivery, family and personal stuff. And
then<00:12:24.320><c> where</c><00:12:24.560><c> it</c><00:12:24.800><c> couldn't</c><00:12:25.200><c> categorize</c><00:12:25.760><c> or</c><00:12:26.000><c> it</c>

00:12:26.230 --> 00:12:26.240 align:start position:0%
then where it couldn't categorize or it
 

00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:28.470 align:start position:0%
then where it couldn't categorize or it
was<00:12:26.399><c> unclear.</c><00:12:27.360><c> If</c><00:12:27.519><c> I</c><00:12:27.680><c> take</c><00:12:27.760><c> it</c><00:12:27.920><c> to</c><00:12:28.160><c> session</c>

00:12:28.470 --> 00:12:28.480 align:start position:0%
was unclear. If I take it to session
 

00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:30.389 align:start position:0%
was unclear. If I take it to session
days,<00:12:29.040><c> you</c><00:12:29.200><c> can</c><00:12:29.279><c> see</c><00:12:29.519><c> again</c><00:12:29.839><c> most</c><00:12:30.079><c> of</c><00:12:30.160><c> my</c>

00:12:30.389 --> 00:12:30.399 align:start position:0%
days, you can see again most of my
 

00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:33.190 align:start position:0%
days, you can see again most of my
sessions<00:12:30.880><c> were</c><00:12:31.680><c> coding.</c><00:12:32.160><c> And</c><00:12:32.320><c> now</c><00:12:32.560><c> it's</c><00:12:32.880><c> like</c>

00:12:33.190 --> 00:12:33.200 align:start position:0%
sessions were coding. And now it's like
 

00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:36.389 align:start position:0%
sessions were coding. And now it's like
more<00:12:33.839><c> equally</c><00:12:34.320><c> split</c><00:12:34.720><c> across</c><00:12:35.200><c> different</c><00:12:36.160><c> use</c>

00:12:36.389 --> 00:12:36.399 align:start position:0%
more equally split across different use
 

00:12:36.399 --> 00:12:39.190 align:start position:0%
more equally split across different use
cases.<00:12:36.959><c> And</c><00:12:37.200><c> so</c><00:12:37.440><c> if</c><00:12:37.680><c> you</c><00:12:38.079><c> think</c><00:12:38.399><c> about</c><00:12:38.720><c> this,</c>

00:12:39.190 --> 00:12:39.200 align:start position:0%
cases. And so if you think about this,
 

00:12:39.200 --> 00:12:41.430 align:start position:0%
cases. And so if you think about this,
it<00:12:39.440><c> is</c><00:12:39.600><c> just</c><00:12:40.000><c> super</c><00:12:40.399><c> useful</c><00:12:40.720><c> to</c><00:12:40.880><c> do</c><00:12:41.040><c> meta</c>

00:12:41.430 --> 00:12:41.440 align:start position:0%
it is just super useful to do meta
 

00:12:41.440 --> 00:12:44.230 align:start position:0%
it is just super useful to do meta
analysis<00:12:42.000><c> on</c><00:12:42.800><c> all</c><00:12:42.959><c> this</c><00:12:43.279><c> data</c><00:12:43.680><c> that's</c><00:12:44.000><c> sitting</c>

00:12:44.230 --> 00:12:44.240 align:start position:0%
analysis on all this data that's sitting
 

00:12:44.240 --> 00:12:47.030 align:start position:0%
analysis on all this data that's sitting
on<00:12:44.399><c> your</c><00:12:44.560><c> desktop</c><00:12:45.200><c> that</c><00:12:45.519><c> LMS</c><00:12:46.160><c> can</c><00:12:46.399><c> totally</c>

00:12:47.030 --> 00:12:47.040 align:start position:0%
on your desktop that LMS can totally
 

00:12:47.040 --> 00:12:49.269 align:start position:0%
on your desktop that LMS can totally
parse.<00:12:47.519><c> that</c><00:12:47.680><c> will</c><00:12:47.839><c> cost</c><00:12:48.079><c> you</c><00:12:48.399><c> basically</c><00:12:49.040><c> no</c>

00:12:49.269 --> 00:12:49.279 align:start position:0%
parse. that will cost you basically no
 

00:12:49.279 --> 00:12:51.670 align:start position:0%
parse. that will cost you basically no
money<00:12:49.760><c> and</c><00:12:50.079><c> give</c><00:12:50.240><c> you</c><00:12:50.399><c> a</c><00:12:50.639><c> lot</c><00:12:50.800><c> of</c><00:12:51.040><c> insight</c><00:12:51.440><c> that</c>

00:12:51.670 --> 00:12:51.680 align:start position:0%
money and give you a lot of insight that
 

00:12:51.680 --> 00:12:54.230 align:start position:0%
money and give you a lot of insight that
I<00:12:51.920><c> think</c><00:12:52.079><c> previously</c><00:12:52.720><c> would</c><00:12:53.040><c> have</c><00:12:53.200><c> been</c><00:12:53.440><c> hard</c>

00:12:54.230 --> 00:12:54.240 align:start position:0%
I think previously would have been hard
 

00:12:54.240 --> 00:12:57.910 align:start position:0%
I think previously would have been hard
to<00:12:54.639><c> get.</c><00:12:55.519><c> So</c><00:12:55.920><c> these</c><00:12:56.320><c> are</c><00:12:56.639><c> two</c><00:12:57.120><c> use</c><00:12:57.360><c> cases</c><00:12:57.680><c> I</c>

00:12:57.910 --> 00:12:57.920 align:start position:0%
to get. So these are two use cases I
 

00:12:57.920 --> 00:13:00.069 align:start position:0%
to get. So these are two use cases I
think<00:12:58.079><c> everybody</c><00:12:58.399><c> who</c><00:12:58.639><c> is</c><00:12:58.880><c> coding</c><00:12:59.279><c> should</c><00:12:59.440><c> do.</c>

00:13:00.069 --> 00:13:00.079 align:start position:0%
think everybody who is coding should do.
 

00:13:00.079 --> 00:13:01.430 align:start position:0%
think everybody who is coding should do.
The<00:13:00.320><c> third</c><00:13:00.480><c> one</c><00:13:00.639><c> and</c><00:13:00.800><c> I</c><00:13:01.040><c> won't</c><00:13:01.120><c> show</c><00:13:01.279><c> it</c>

00:13:01.430 --> 00:13:01.440 align:start position:0%
The third one and I won't show it
 

00:13:01.440 --> 00:13:02.470 align:start position:0%
The third one and I won't show it
because<00:13:01.600><c> it's</c><00:13:01.760><c> a</c><00:13:01.839><c> lot</c><00:13:01.920><c> of</c><00:13:02.000><c> my</c><00:13:02.160><c> private</c>

00:13:02.470 --> 00:13:02.480 align:start position:0%
because it's a lot of my private
 

00:13:02.480 --> 00:13:04.870 align:start position:0%
because it's a lot of my private
information<00:13:03.040><c> is</c><00:13:03.600><c> I</c><00:13:03.760><c> did</c><00:13:03.920><c> run</c><00:13:04.160><c> this</c><00:13:04.320><c> on</c><00:13:04.480><c> my</c>

00:13:04.870 --> 00:13:04.880 align:start position:0%
information is I did run this on my
 

00:13:04.880 --> 00:13:07.509 align:start position:0%
information is I did run this on my
personal<00:13:05.839><c> Gmail.</c><00:13:06.320><c> So</c><00:13:06.399><c> I</c><00:13:06.639><c> basically</c><00:13:06.880><c> said</c><00:13:07.120><c> like</c>

00:13:07.509 --> 00:13:07.519 align:start position:0%
personal Gmail. So I basically said like
 

00:13:07.519 --> 00:13:09.430 align:start position:0%
personal Gmail. So I basically said like
given<00:13:07.839><c> a</c><00:13:08.079><c> subject</c><00:13:08.399><c> line</c><00:13:08.560><c> and</c><00:13:08.800><c> a</c><00:13:08.959><c> snippet</c>

00:13:09.430 --> 00:13:09.440 align:start position:0%
given a subject line and a snippet
 

00:13:09.440 --> 00:13:10.949 align:start position:0%
given a subject line and a snippet
categorize<00:13:10.000><c> whether</c><00:13:10.160><c> or</c><00:13:10.320><c> not</c><00:13:10.480><c> I</c><00:13:10.639><c> can</c><00:13:10.720><c> like</c>

00:13:10.949 --> 00:13:10.959 align:start position:0%
categorize whether or not I can like
 

00:13:10.959 --> 00:13:12.790 align:start position:0%
categorize whether or not I can like
delete<00:13:11.279><c> this</c><00:13:11.519><c> email</c><00:13:12.000><c> like</c><00:13:12.160><c> score</c><00:13:12.480><c> whether</c><00:13:12.639><c> or</c>

00:13:12.790 --> 00:13:12.800 align:start position:0%
delete this email like score whether or
 

00:13:12.800 --> 00:13:14.710 align:start position:0%
delete this email like score whether or
not<00:13:12.880><c> I</c><00:13:13.040><c> can</c><00:13:13.200><c> delete</c><00:13:13.360><c> this</c><00:13:13.600><c> email.</c><00:13:14.160><c> It</c><00:13:14.399><c> did</c><00:13:14.480><c> it</c>

00:13:14.710 --> 00:13:14.720 align:start position:0%
not I can delete this email. It did it
 

00:13:14.720 --> 00:13:16.710 align:start position:0%
not I can delete this email. It did it
very<00:13:15.040><c> fast</c><00:13:15.360><c> and</c><00:13:15.519><c> then</c><00:13:15.680><c> it</c><00:13:15.839><c> gave</c><00:13:16.000><c> me</c><00:13:16.160><c> very</c><00:13:16.399><c> clean</c>

00:13:16.710 --> 00:13:16.720 align:start position:0%
very fast and then it gave me very clean
 

00:13:16.720 --> 00:13:19.509 align:start position:0%
very fast and then it gave me very clean
tags<00:13:17.120><c> that</c><00:13:17.440><c> I</c><00:13:17.600><c> could</c><00:13:17.760><c> go</c><00:13:17.920><c> through</c><00:13:18.480><c> and</c><00:13:19.279><c> then</c>

00:13:19.509 --> 00:13:19.519 align:start position:0%
tags that I could go through and then
 

00:13:19.519 --> 00:13:21.590 align:start position:0%
tags that I could go through and then
have<00:13:19.760><c> another</c><00:13:20.240><c> model</c><00:13:20.720><c> work</c><00:13:21.040><c> through</c>

00:13:21.590 --> 00:13:21.600 align:start position:0%
have another model work through
 

00:13:21.600 --> 00:13:24.069 align:start position:0%
have another model work through
categorized<00:13:22.399><c> emails.</c><00:13:22.880><c> And</c><00:13:23.040><c> so</c><00:13:23.600><c> this</c><00:13:23.760><c> is</c><00:13:23.920><c> where</c>

00:13:24.069 --> 00:13:24.079 align:start position:0%
categorized emails. And so this is where
 

00:13:24.079 --> 00:13:27.670 align:start position:0%
categorized emails. And so this is where
I<00:13:24.320><c> would</c><00:13:24.480><c> say</c><00:13:24.639><c> like</c><00:13:24.959><c> Jev</c><00:13:25.279><c> alone</c><00:13:26.399><c> is</c><00:13:26.720><c> okay.</c><00:13:27.279><c> Jev</c>

00:13:27.670 --> 00:13:27.680 align:start position:0%
I would say like Jev alone is okay. Jev
 

00:13:27.680 --> 00:13:31.190 align:start position:0%
I would say like Jev alone is okay. Jev
with<00:13:27.839><c> an</c><00:13:28.000><c> LLM</c><00:13:28.560><c> buddy</c><00:13:28.880><c> is</c><00:13:29.200><c> super</c><00:13:29.920><c> powerful.</c><00:13:30.959><c> So</c>

00:13:31.190 --> 00:13:31.200 align:start position:0%
with an LLM buddy is super powerful. So
 

00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:32.949 align:start position:0%
with an LLM buddy is super powerful. So
what<00:13:31.360><c> I</c><00:13:31.600><c> like</c><00:13:31.680><c> to</c><00:13:31.839><c> do</c><00:13:32.000><c> with</c><00:13:32.160><c> Jab</c><00:13:32.480><c> is</c><00:13:32.560><c> I</c><00:13:32.720><c> like</c><00:13:32.800><c> to</c>

00:13:32.949 --> 00:13:32.959 align:start position:0%
what I like to do with Jab is I like to
 

00:13:32.959 --> 00:13:35.750 align:start position:0%
what I like to do with Jab is I like to
take<00:13:33.120><c> a</c><00:13:33.279><c> big</c><00:13:33.440><c> corpus</c><00:13:33.839><c> of</c><00:13:34.079><c> information,</c><00:13:35.440><c> tag</c>

00:13:35.750 --> 00:13:35.760 align:start position:0%
take a big corpus of information, tag
 

00:13:35.760 --> 00:13:39.110 align:start position:0%
take a big corpus of information, tag
it,<00:13:36.160><c> categorize</c><00:13:36.880><c> it,</c><00:13:37.839><c> cluster</c><00:13:38.240><c> it,</c><00:13:38.720><c> filter</c>

00:13:39.110 --> 00:13:39.120 align:start position:0%
it, categorize it, cluster it, filter
 

00:13:39.120 --> 00:13:43.030 align:start position:0%
it, categorize it, cluster it, filter
it,<00:13:40.079><c> and</c><00:13:40.320><c> then</c><00:13:41.120><c> apply</c><00:13:41.600><c> really</c><00:13:42.000><c> precise</c><00:13:42.560><c> AI</c>

00:13:43.030 --> 00:13:43.040 align:start position:0%
it, and then apply really precise AI
 

00:13:43.040 --> 00:13:46.230 align:start position:0%
it, and then apply really precise AI
actions<00:13:43.440><c> to</c><00:13:43.760><c> the</c><00:13:44.000><c> right</c><00:13:44.320><c> clusters.</c><00:13:44.959><c> And</c><00:13:45.200><c> so</c>

00:13:46.230 --> 00:13:46.240 align:start position:0%
actions to the right clusters. And so
 

00:13:46.240 --> 00:13:48.629 align:start position:0%
actions to the right clusters. And so
that<00:13:46.560><c> could</c><00:13:46.720><c> be</c><00:13:47.279><c> take</c><00:13:47.440><c> your</c><00:13:47.680><c> bugs,</c><00:13:48.320><c> take</c><00:13:48.480><c> your</c>

00:13:48.629 --> 00:13:48.639 align:start position:0%
that could be take your bugs, take your
 

00:13:48.639 --> 00:13:50.629 align:start position:0%
that could be take your bugs, take your
high<00:13:48.880><c> severity</c><00:13:49.360><c> ones</c><00:13:49.680><c> and</c><00:13:49.920><c> really</c><00:13:50.160><c> triage</c>

00:13:50.629 --> 00:13:50.639 align:start position:0%
high severity ones and really triage
 

00:13:50.639 --> 00:13:52.550 align:start position:0%
high severity ones and really triage
them<00:13:50.800><c> deeply.</c><00:13:51.680><c> It</c><00:13:51.839><c> could</c><00:13:52.000><c> be</c><00:13:52.160><c> take</c><00:13:52.320><c> your</c>

00:13:52.550 --> 00:13:52.560 align:start position:0%
them deeply. It could be take your
 

00:13:52.560 --> 00:13:54.550 align:start position:0%
them deeply. It could be take your
emails,<00:13:53.200><c> group</c><00:13:53.440><c> them</c><00:13:53.600><c> into</c><00:13:53.920><c> like</c><00:13:54.160><c> you</c><00:13:54.399><c> can</c>

00:13:54.550 --> 00:13:54.560 align:start position:0%
emails, group them into like you can
 

00:13:54.560 --> 00:13:56.069 align:start position:0%
emails, group them into like you can
definitely<00:13:54.880><c> delete</c><00:13:55.200><c> them</c><00:13:55.279><c> and</c><00:13:55.600><c> ignore</c><00:13:55.839><c> them,</c>

00:13:56.069 --> 00:13:56.079 align:start position:0%
definitely delete them and ignore them,
 

00:13:56.079 --> 00:13:57.670 align:start position:0%
definitely delete them and ignore them,
delete<00:13:56.399><c> them,</c><00:13:56.560><c> and</c><00:13:56.800><c> then</c><00:13:56.959><c> work</c><00:13:57.199><c> your</c><00:13:57.440><c> other</c>

00:13:57.670 --> 00:13:57.680 align:start position:0%
delete them, and then work your other
 

00:13:57.680 --> 00:13:59.990 align:start position:0%
delete them, and then work your other
emails<00:13:58.000><c> with</c><00:13:58.160><c> an</c><00:13:58.399><c> agent.</c><00:13:59.199><c> It's</c><00:13:59.519><c> just</c><00:13:59.760><c> all</c>

00:13:59.990 --> 00:14:00.000 align:start position:0%
emails with an agent. It's just all
 

00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:01.829 align:start position:0%
emails with an agent. It's just all
those<00:14:00.240><c> things</c><00:14:00.399><c> that</c><00:14:00.560><c> you</c><00:14:00.720><c> can</c><00:14:00.880><c> do</c><00:14:01.199><c> where</c><00:14:01.519><c> a</c>

00:14:01.829 --> 00:14:01.839 align:start position:0%
those things that you can do where a
 

00:14:01.839 --> 00:14:05.189 align:start position:0%
those things that you can do where a
very<00:14:02.160><c> fast</c><00:14:02.639><c> but</c><00:14:02.959><c> accurate</c><00:14:03.440><c> filter</c><00:14:04.240><c> can</c><00:14:04.560><c> be</c>

00:14:05.189 --> 00:14:05.199 align:start position:0%
very fast but accurate filter can be
 

00:14:05.199 --> 00:14:08.150 align:start position:0%
very fast but accurate filter can be
helpful.<00:14:06.399><c> So,</c><00:14:06.720><c> I</c><00:14:06.959><c> think</c><00:14:07.120><c> this</c><00:14:07.360><c> is</c><00:14:07.839><c> so</c>

00:14:08.150 --> 00:14:08.160 align:start position:0%
helpful. So, I think this is so
 

00:14:08.160 --> 00:14:11.430 align:start position:0%
helpful. So, I think this is so
powerful.<00:14:08.639><c> I</c><00:14:08.880><c> hope</c><00:14:09.040><c> it</c><00:14:09.279><c> unlocks</c><00:14:09.920><c> your</c><00:14:10.399><c> minds</c>

00:14:11.430 --> 00:14:11.440 align:start position:0%
powerful. I hope it unlocks your minds
 

00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:13.829 align:start position:0%
powerful. I hope it unlocks your minds
on<00:14:12.000><c> what</c><00:14:12.320><c> Jev</c><00:14:12.720><c> can</c><00:14:12.880><c> do.</c><00:14:13.040><c> I</c><00:14:13.279><c> want</c><00:14:13.360><c> to</c><00:14:13.519><c> show</c><00:14:13.680><c> you</c>

00:14:13.829 --> 00:14:13.839 align:start position:0%
on what Jev can do. I want to show you
 

00:14:13.839 --> 00:14:16.230 align:start position:0%
on what Jev can do. I want to show you
like<00:14:14.160><c> the</c><00:14:14.639><c> biggest</c><00:14:15.199><c> version</c><00:14:15.519><c> of</c><00:14:15.760><c> this</c><00:14:16.000><c> that</c>

00:14:16.230 --> 00:14:16.240 align:start position:0%
like the biggest version of this that
 

00:14:16.240 --> 00:14:18.470 align:start position:0%
like the biggest version of this that
I've<00:14:16.480><c> done</c><00:14:16.720><c> just</c><00:14:16.959><c> to</c><00:14:17.120><c> like</c><00:14:17.279><c> kind</c><00:14:17.440><c> of</c><00:14:17.519><c> give</c><00:14:17.680><c> you</c>

00:14:18.470 --> 00:14:18.480 align:start position:0%
I've done just to like kind of give you
 

00:14:18.480 --> 00:14:21.110 align:start position:0%
I've done just to like kind of give you
numbers<00:14:18.800><c> and</c><00:14:19.040><c> ideas</c><00:14:19.440><c> of</c><00:14:19.680><c> what</c><00:14:19.839><c> I'm</c><00:14:20.079><c> working</c><00:14:20.240><c> on</c>

00:14:21.110 --> 00:14:21.120 align:start position:0%
numbers and ideas of what I'm working on
 

00:14:21.120 --> 00:14:23.030 align:start position:0%
numbers and ideas of what I'm working on
and<00:14:21.360><c> then</c><00:14:21.519><c> I'll</c><00:14:21.760><c> show</c><00:14:21.920><c> a</c><00:14:22.240><c> couple</c><00:14:22.399><c> like</c><00:14:22.720><c> fun</c>

00:14:23.030 --> 00:14:23.040 align:start position:0%
and then I'll show a couple like fun
 

00:14:23.040 --> 00:14:26.230 align:start position:0%
and then I'll show a couple like fun
little<00:14:23.440><c> apps</c><00:14:24.240><c> that</c><00:14:24.480><c> you</c><00:14:24.720><c> can</c><00:14:24.880><c> build</c><00:14:25.360><c> with</c><00:14:25.839><c> Jev</c>

00:14:26.230 --> 00:14:26.240 align:start position:0%
little apps that you can build with Jev
 

00:14:26.240 --> 00:14:27.910 align:start position:0%
little apps that you can build with Jev
that<00:14:26.480><c> I</c><00:14:26.560><c> think</c><00:14:26.720><c> would</c><00:14:26.880><c> have</c><00:14:27.040><c> been</c><00:14:27.199><c> hard</c><00:14:27.680><c> to</c>

00:14:27.910 --> 00:14:27.920 align:start position:0%
that I think would have been hard to
 

00:14:27.920 --> 00:14:32.069 align:start position:0%
that I think would have been hard to
build<00:14:28.880><c> before.</c><00:14:29.760><c> So</c><00:14:30.240><c> the</c><00:14:30.720><c> example</c><00:14:31.360><c> I</c><00:14:31.680><c> want</c><00:14:31.839><c> to</c>

00:14:32.069 --> 00:14:32.079 align:start position:0%
build before. So the example I want to
 

00:14:32.079 --> 00:14:34.310 align:start position:0%
build before. So the example I want to
give<00:14:32.800><c> is</c><00:14:33.199><c> you</c><00:14:33.360><c> all</c><00:14:33.519><c> have</c><00:14:33.680><c> heard</c><00:14:33.839><c> me</c><00:14:34.000><c> talk</c><00:14:34.160><c> about</c>

00:14:34.310 --> 00:14:34.320 align:start position:0%
give is you all have heard me talk about
 

00:14:34.320 --> 00:14:36.710 align:start position:0%
give is you all have heard me talk about
this<00:14:34.560><c> product.</c><00:14:34.959><c> So</c><00:14:35.519><c> chat</c><00:14:35.839><c> PD</c><00:14:36.320><c> I'm</c><00:14:36.480><c> trying</c><00:14:36.560><c> to</c>

00:14:36.710 --> 00:14:36.720 align:start position:0%
this product. So chat PD I'm trying to
 

00:14:36.720 --> 00:14:39.910 align:start position:0%
this product. So chat PD I'm trying to
build<00:14:36.880><c> like</c><00:14:37.040><c> a</c><00:14:37.279><c> product</c><00:14:37.760><c> insights</c><00:14:39.120><c> graph.</c>

00:14:39.910 --> 00:14:39.920 align:start position:0%
build like a product insights graph.
 

00:14:39.920 --> 00:14:41.509 align:start position:0%
build like a product insights graph.
Basically,<00:14:40.399><c> I'm</c><00:14:40.560><c> like</c><00:14:40.720><c> trying</c><00:14:40.959><c> to</c><00:14:41.120><c> suck</c><00:14:41.360><c> in</c>

00:14:41.509 --> 00:14:41.519 align:start position:0%
Basically, I'm like trying to suck in
 

00:14:41.519 --> 00:14:44.069 align:start position:0%
Basically, I'm like trying to suck in
everybody's<00:14:42.000><c> data</c><00:14:42.720><c> and</c><00:14:42.959><c> tell</c><00:14:43.120><c> you</c><00:14:43.600><c> really</c>

00:14:44.069 --> 00:14:44.079 align:start position:0%
everybody's data and tell you really
 

00:14:44.079 --> 00:14:47.350 align:start position:0%
everybody's data and tell you really
interesting<00:14:45.120><c> insights</c><00:14:45.839><c> about</c><00:14:46.079><c> it.</c><00:14:46.800><c> And</c><00:14:47.040><c> I</c>

00:14:47.350 --> 00:14:47.360 align:start position:0%
interesting insights about it. And I
 

00:14:47.360 --> 00:14:49.430 align:start position:0%
interesting insights about it. And I
have<00:14:47.519><c> used</c><00:14:47.920><c> every</c><00:14:48.240><c> frontier</c><00:14:48.800><c> model</c><00:14:49.120><c> there</c><00:14:49.279><c> is</c>

00:14:49.430 --> 00:14:49.440 align:start position:0%
have used every frontier model there is
 

00:14:49.440 --> 00:14:50.870 align:start position:0%
have used every frontier model there is
to<00:14:49.680><c> try</c><00:14:49.760><c> to</c><00:14:49.920><c> figure</c><00:14:50.079><c> out.</c><00:14:50.320><c> And</c><00:14:50.480><c> it's</c><00:14:50.720><c> just</c>

00:14:50.870 --> 00:14:50.880 align:start position:0%
to try to figure out. And it's just
 

00:14:50.880 --> 00:14:52.150 align:start position:0%
to try to figure out. And it's just
really<00:14:51.040><c> hard.</c><00:14:51.279><c> There's</c><00:14:51.519><c> just</c><00:14:51.680><c> too</c><00:14:51.920><c> much</c>

00:14:52.150 --> 00:14:52.160 align:start position:0%
really hard. There's just too much
 

00:14:52.160 --> 00:14:56.310 align:start position:0%
really hard. There's just too much
nuance<00:14:52.800><c> in</c><00:14:53.839><c> all</c><00:14:54.079><c> the</c><00:14:54.320><c> data</c><00:14:54.720><c> to</c><00:14:54.959><c> kind</c><00:14:55.120><c> of</c><00:14:55.279><c> like</c>

00:14:56.310 --> 00:14:56.320 align:start position:0%
nuance in all the data to kind of like
 

00:14:56.320 --> 00:14:57.990 align:start position:0%
nuance in all the data to kind of like
gro<00:14:56.639><c> all</c><00:14:56.880><c> this,</c><00:14:57.120><c> get</c><00:14:57.360><c> it</c><00:14:57.440><c> in</c><00:14:57.600><c> structured</c>

00:14:57.990 --> 00:14:58.000 align:start position:0%
gro all this, get it in structured
 

00:14:58.000 --> 00:14:59.670 align:start position:0%
gro all this, get it in structured
format,<00:14:58.480><c> do</c><00:14:58.639><c> the</c><00:14:58.800><c> right</c><00:14:58.959><c> like</c><00:14:59.199><c> structured,</c>

00:14:59.670 --> 00:14:59.680 align:start position:0%
format, do the right like structured,
 

00:14:59.680 --> 00:15:01.910 align:start position:0%
format, do the right like structured,
unstructured.<00:15:00.399><c> It's</c><00:15:00.800><c> super</c><00:15:01.199><c> expensive.</c><00:15:01.680><c> I've</c>

00:15:01.910 --> 00:15:01.920 align:start position:0%
unstructured. It's super expensive. I've
 

00:15:01.920 --> 00:15:04.389 align:start position:0%
unstructured. It's super expensive. I've
spent<00:15:02.880><c> thousands</c><00:15:03.360><c> of</c><00:15:03.519><c> dollars</c><00:15:03.760><c> if</c><00:15:04.000><c> not</c><00:15:04.160><c> tens</c>

00:15:04.389 --> 00:15:04.399 align:start position:0%
spent thousands of dollars if not tens
 

00:15:04.399 --> 00:15:06.150 align:start position:0%
spent thousands of dollars if not tens
of<00:15:04.560><c> thousands</c><00:15:04.880><c> of</c><00:15:05.040><c> dollars</c><00:15:05.519><c> trying</c><00:15:05.920><c> to</c>

00:15:06.150 --> 00:15:06.160 align:start position:0%
of thousands of dollars trying to
 

00:15:06.160 --> 00:15:10.069 align:start position:0%
of thousands of dollars trying to
prototype<00:15:06.800><c> this.</c><00:15:07.600><c> It's</c><00:15:07.920><c> just</c><00:15:08.560><c> hard.</c><00:15:09.600><c> And</c><00:15:09.839><c> I</c>

00:15:10.069 --> 00:15:10.079 align:start position:0%
prototype this. It's just hard. And I
 

00:15:10.079 --> 00:15:13.590 align:start position:0%
prototype this. It's just hard. And I
think<00:15:10.399><c> I</c><00:15:10.720><c> cracked</c><00:15:11.120><c> this</c><00:15:11.360><c> baby</c><00:15:12.320><c> with</c><00:15:12.639><c> Jev.</c><00:15:13.360><c> I</c>

00:15:13.590 --> 00:15:13.600 align:start position:0%
think I cracked this baby with Jev. I
 

00:15:13.600 --> 00:15:15.189 align:start position:0%
think I cracked this baby with Jev. I
kind<00:15:13.680><c> of</c><00:15:13.760><c> want</c><00:15:13.839><c> to</c><00:15:14.000><c> show</c><00:15:14.240><c> you</c><00:15:14.399><c> what</c><00:15:14.639><c> that</c>

00:15:15.189 --> 00:15:15.199 align:start position:0%
kind of want to show you what that
 

00:15:15.199 --> 00:15:16.710 align:start position:0%
kind of want to show you what that
means,

00:15:16.710 --> 00:15:16.720 align:start position:0%
means,
 

00:15:16.720 --> 00:15:20.310 align:start position:0%
means,
which<00:15:17.120><c> is</c><00:15:18.000><c> it's</c><00:15:18.320><c> not</c><00:15:18.560><c> that</c><00:15:18.800><c> I</c><00:15:19.199><c> like</c><00:15:19.440><c> Jev</c><00:15:20.079><c> has</c>

00:15:20.310 --> 00:15:20.320 align:start position:0%
which is it's not that I like Jev has
 

00:15:20.320 --> 00:15:23.990 align:start position:0%
which is it's not that I like Jev has
done<00:15:20.560><c> it</c><00:15:20.800><c> all</c><00:15:21.760><c> at</c><00:15:22.000><c> all.</c><00:15:22.800><c> It</c><00:15:23.040><c> is</c><00:15:23.279><c> actually</c><00:15:23.680><c> I</c>

00:15:23.990 --> 00:15:24.000 align:start position:0%
done it all at all. It is actually I
 

00:15:24.000 --> 00:15:26.470 align:start position:0%
done it all at all. It is actually I
have<00:15:24.160><c> figured</c><00:15:24.399><c> out</c><00:15:24.560><c> where</c><00:15:25.199><c> classification,</c>

00:15:26.470 --> 00:15:26.480 align:start position:0%
have figured out where classification,
 

00:15:26.480 --> 00:15:30.069 align:start position:0%
have figured out where classification,
clustering,<00:15:27.440><c> and</c><00:15:27.760><c> mapping</c><00:15:29.040><c> are</c><00:15:29.360><c> important</c>

00:15:30.069 --> 00:15:30.079 align:start position:0%
clustering, and mapping are important
 

00:15:30.079 --> 00:15:32.470 align:start position:0%
clustering, and mapping are important
and<00:15:30.320><c> I</c><00:15:30.480><c> put</c><00:15:30.720><c> Jeff</c><00:15:31.120><c> there.</c><00:15:31.839><c> And</c><00:15:32.000><c> then</c><00:15:32.160><c> I</c><00:15:32.320><c> figure</c>

00:15:32.470 --> 00:15:32.480 align:start position:0%
and I put Jeff there. And then I figure
 

00:15:32.480 --> 00:15:35.110 align:start position:0%
and I put Jeff there. And then I figure
out<00:15:32.639><c> where</c><00:15:32.880><c> like</c><00:15:33.040><c> the</c><00:15:33.279><c> big</c><00:15:33.600><c> brains</c><00:15:34.160><c> like</c>

00:15:35.110 --> 00:15:35.120 align:start position:0%
out where like the big brains like
 

00:15:35.120 --> 00:15:36.629 align:start position:0%
out where like the big brains like
analysis,

00:15:36.629 --> 00:15:36.639 align:start position:0%
analysis,
 

00:15:36.639 --> 00:15:39.590 align:start position:0%
analysis,
strategy,<00:15:37.519><c> insights,</c><00:15:38.079><c> extraction,</c><00:15:39.199><c> and</c><00:15:39.360><c> I</c>

00:15:39.590 --> 00:15:39.600 align:start position:0%
strategy, insights, extraction, and I
 

00:15:39.600 --> 00:15:42.310 align:start position:0%
strategy, insights, extraction, and I
put<00:15:39.760><c> like</c><00:15:40.000><c> Astra</c><00:15:41.040><c> there.</c><00:15:41.839><c> And</c><00:15:42.000><c> then</c><00:15:42.160><c> like</c>

00:15:42.310 --> 00:15:42.320 align:start position:0%
put like Astra there. And then like
 

00:15:42.320 --> 00:15:45.110 align:start position:0%
put like Astra there. And then like
where<00:15:42.720><c> generation</c><00:15:44.000><c> is</c><00:15:44.320><c> important,</c><00:15:44.720><c> I</c><00:15:44.959><c> use</c>

00:15:45.110 --> 00:15:45.120 align:start position:0%
where generation is important, I use
 

00:15:45.120 --> 00:15:47.990 align:start position:0%
where generation is important, I use
like<00:15:45.279><c> a</c><00:15:45.519><c> soul</c><00:15:46.079><c> or</c><00:15:46.240><c> a</c><00:15:46.399><c> Luna.</c><00:15:47.279><c> And</c><00:15:47.519><c> so</c><00:15:47.680><c> if</c><00:15:47.920><c> you</c>

00:15:47.990 --> 00:15:48.000 align:start position:0%
like a soul or a Luna. And so if you
 

00:15:48.000 --> 00:15:49.350 align:start position:0%
like a soul or a Luna. And so if you
look<00:15:48.160><c> at</c><00:15:48.240><c> this</c><00:15:48.399><c> map</c><00:15:48.560><c> and</c><00:15:48.800><c> it's</c><00:15:48.959><c> like</c><00:15:49.120><c> probably</c>

00:15:49.350 --> 00:15:49.360 align:start position:0%
look at this map and it's like probably
 

00:15:49.360 --> 00:15:51.030 align:start position:0%
look at this map and it's like probably
not<00:15:49.519><c> that</c><00:15:49.759><c> interesting</c><00:15:50.079><c> to</c><00:15:50.240><c> you</c><00:15:50.399><c> all</c><00:15:50.800><c> because</c>

00:15:51.030 --> 00:15:51.040 align:start position:0%
not that interesting to you all because
 

00:15:51.040 --> 00:15:54.870 align:start position:0%
not that interesting to you all because
it's<00:15:51.440><c> very</c><00:15:51.839><c> internal</c><00:15:52.320><c> to</c><00:15:52.800><c> chat</c><00:15:53.120><c> pd</c><00:15:53.759><c> but</c><00:15:54.639><c> you</c>

00:15:54.870 --> 00:15:54.880 align:start position:0%
it's very internal to chat pd but you
 

00:15:54.880 --> 00:15:58.629 align:start position:0%
it's very internal to chat pd but you
can<00:15:55.040><c> see</c><00:15:55.199><c> like</c><00:15:55.519><c> I</c><00:15:55.839><c> extract</c><00:15:56.399><c> things,</c><00:15:57.680><c> I</c><00:15:58.079><c> extract</c>

00:15:58.629 --> 00:15:58.639 align:start position:0%
can see like I extract things, I extract
 

00:15:58.639 --> 00:16:01.110 align:start position:0%
can see like I extract things, I extract
labels,<00:15:59.440><c> I</c><00:15:59.680><c> then</c><00:16:00.079><c> quickly</c><00:16:00.560><c> assign</c><00:16:00.880><c> everything</c>

00:16:01.110 --> 00:16:01.120 align:start position:0%
labels, I then quickly assign everything
 

00:16:01.120 --> 00:16:04.230 align:start position:0%
labels, I then quickly assign everything
to<00:16:01.360><c> those</c><00:16:01.519><c> labels</c><00:16:01.839><c> with</c><00:16:02.079><c> Jev,</c><00:16:03.199><c> then</c><00:16:03.519><c> I</c><00:16:03.759><c> pair</c>

00:16:04.230 --> 00:16:04.240 align:start position:0%
to those labels with Jev, then I pair
 

00:16:04.240 --> 00:16:06.150 align:start position:0%
to those labels with Jev, then I pair
those<00:16:04.720><c> clusters</c><00:16:05.199><c> in</c><00:16:05.440><c> those</c><00:16:05.600><c> groups</c><00:16:05.920><c> with</c>

00:16:06.150 --> 00:16:06.160 align:start position:0%
those clusters in those groups with
 

00:16:06.160 --> 00:16:07.749 align:start position:0%
those clusters in those groups with
Astra<00:16:06.560><c> and</c><00:16:06.720><c> I</c><00:16:06.880><c> say</c><00:16:06.959><c> like</c><00:16:07.199><c> what</c><00:16:07.360><c> the</c><00:16:07.440><c> heck's</c>

00:16:07.749 --> 00:16:07.759 align:start position:0%
Astra and I say like what the heck's
 

00:16:07.759 --> 00:16:10.069 align:start position:0%
Astra and I say like what the heck's
going<00:16:07.920><c> on</c><00:16:08.160><c> across</c><00:16:08.560><c> all</c><00:16:08.800><c> of</c><00:16:08.959><c> this.</c><00:16:09.600><c> And</c><00:16:09.759><c> then</c><00:16:09.920><c> it</c>

00:16:10.069 --> 00:16:10.079 align:start position:0%
going on across all of this. And then it
 

00:16:10.079 --> 00:16:12.629 align:start position:0%
going on across all of this. And then it
extracts<00:16:10.639><c> more</c><00:16:10.959><c> insights</c><00:16:11.600><c> and</c><00:16:12.240><c> all</c><00:16:12.399><c> of</c><00:16:12.480><c> a</c>

00:16:12.629 --> 00:16:12.639 align:start position:0%
extracts more insights and all of a
 

00:16:12.639 --> 00:16:15.110 align:start position:0%
extracts more insights and all of a
sudden<00:16:12.800><c> I</c><00:16:13.040><c> have</c><00:16:13.199><c> this</c><00:16:13.440><c> really</c><00:16:13.759><c> cool</c><00:16:14.639><c> product.</c>

00:16:15.110 --> 00:16:15.120 align:start position:0%
sudden I have this really cool product.
 

00:16:15.120 --> 00:16:17.030 align:start position:0%
sudden I have this really cool product.
And<00:16:15.360><c> just</c><00:16:15.600><c> to</c><00:16:15.759><c> give</c><00:16:15.839><c> you</c><00:16:16.000><c> a</c><00:16:16.160><c> sense</c><00:16:16.399><c> of</c><00:16:16.560><c> like</c><00:16:16.800><c> the</c>

00:16:17.030 --> 00:16:17.040 align:start position:0%
And just to give you a sense of like the
 

00:16:17.040 --> 00:16:20.069 align:start position:0%
And just to give you a sense of like the
scope<00:16:17.360><c> of</c><00:16:17.600><c> data</c><00:16:17.839><c> here,</c><00:16:19.040><c> I'm</c><00:16:19.360><c> probably</c><00:16:19.680><c> pulling</c>

00:16:20.069 --> 00:16:20.079 align:start position:0%
scope of data here, I'm probably pulling
 

00:16:20.079 --> 00:16:23.990 align:start position:0%
scope of data here, I'm probably pulling
about<00:16:21.279><c> a,00and</c><00:16:22.320><c> um,</c><00:16:22.800><c> 1100</c><00:16:23.360><c> individual</c>

00:16:23.990 --> 00:16:24.000 align:start position:0%
about a,00and um, 1100 individual
 

00:16:24.000 --> 00:16:26.629 align:start position:0%
about a,00and um, 1100 individual
signals<00:16:24.399><c> into</c><00:16:24.639><c> this.</c><00:16:24.880><c> So</c><00:16:25.040><c> these</c><00:16:25.279><c> are</c><00:16:25.440><c> PRs,</c>

00:16:26.629 --> 00:16:26.639 align:start position:0%
signals into this. So these are PRs,
 

00:16:26.639 --> 00:16:29.430 align:start position:0%
signals into this. So these are PRs,
these<00:16:26.959><c> are</c><00:16:27.680><c> support</c><00:16:28.079><c> tickets,</c><00:16:28.880><c> these</c><00:16:29.199><c> are</c>

00:16:29.430 --> 00:16:29.440 align:start position:0%
these are support tickets, these are
 

00:16:29.440 --> 00:16:31.670 align:start position:0%
these are support tickets, these are
granola<00:16:30.000><c> conversations,</c>

00:16:31.670 --> 00:16:31.680 align:start position:0%
granola conversations,
 

00:16:31.680 --> 00:16:34.150 align:start position:0%
granola conversations,
these<00:16:32.079><c> are</c><00:16:32.639><c> um,</c><00:16:32.800><c> linear</c><00:16:33.279><c> tickets.</c><00:16:34.000><c> They're</c>

00:16:34.150 --> 00:16:34.160 align:start position:0%
these are um, linear tickets. They're
 

00:16:34.160 --> 00:16:35.990 align:start position:0%
these are um, linear tickets. They're
like<00:16:34.399><c> kind</c><00:16:34.480><c> of</c><00:16:34.639><c> like</c><00:16:34.800><c> all</c><00:16:34.959><c> the</c><00:16:35.199><c> signals</c><00:16:35.600><c> in</c><00:16:35.839><c> our</c>

00:16:35.990 --> 00:16:36.000 align:start position:0%
like kind of like all the signals in our
 

00:16:36.000 --> 00:16:37.990 align:start position:0%
like kind of like all the signals in our
business<00:16:36.399><c> about</c><00:16:37.120><c> what</c><00:16:37.360><c> people</c><00:16:37.519><c> are</c><00:16:37.759><c> worried</c>

00:16:37.990 --> 00:16:38.000 align:start position:0%
business about what people are worried
 

00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:41.829 align:start position:0%
business about what people are worried
about<00:16:38.240><c> and</c><00:16:38.880><c> what</c><00:16:39.279><c> is</c><00:16:39.519><c> going</c><00:16:39.680><c> on.</c><00:16:40.639><c> And</c><00:16:40.959><c> then</c><00:16:41.440><c> I'm</c>

00:16:41.829 --> 00:16:41.839 align:start position:0%
about and what is going on. And then I'm
 

00:16:41.839 --> 00:16:45.030 align:start position:0%
about and what is going on. And then I'm
getting<00:16:42.320><c> now</c><00:16:42.639><c> like</c><00:16:42.880><c> this</c><00:16:43.199><c> gap</c><00:16:43.680><c> between</c><00:16:44.880><c> what</c>

00:16:45.030 --> 00:16:45.040 align:start position:0%
getting now like this gap between what
 

00:16:45.040 --> 00:16:47.509 align:start position:0%
getting now like this gap between what
are<00:16:45.279><c> customers</c><00:16:45.600><c> telling</c><00:16:45.839><c> us</c><00:16:46.000><c> they</c><00:16:46.240><c> want</c><00:16:47.120><c> and</c>

00:16:47.509 --> 00:16:47.519 align:start position:0%
are customers telling us they want and
 

00:16:47.519 --> 00:16:49.829 align:start position:0%
are customers telling us they want and
what<00:16:47.759><c> are</c><00:16:47.920><c> we</c><00:16:48.240><c> actually</c><00:16:48.880><c> working</c><00:16:49.120><c> on</c><00:16:49.440><c> and</c><00:16:49.600><c> I</c>

00:16:49.829 --> 00:16:49.839 align:start position:0%
what are we actually working on and I
 

00:16:49.839 --> 00:16:51.910 align:start position:0%
what are we actually working on and I
can<00:16:49.920><c> get</c><00:16:50.079><c> those</c><00:16:50.320><c> trends</c><00:16:50.720><c> over</c><00:16:51.040><c> time</c><00:16:51.440><c> I</c><00:16:51.600><c> can</c><00:16:51.759><c> get</c>

00:16:51.910 --> 00:16:51.920 align:start position:0%
can get those trends over time I can get
 

00:16:51.920 --> 00:16:53.749 align:start position:0%
can get those trends over time I can get
them<00:16:52.240><c> categorized</c>

00:16:53.749 --> 00:16:53.759 align:start position:0%
them categorized
 

00:16:53.759 --> 00:16:56.069 align:start position:0%
them categorized
I<00:16:54.000><c> can</c><00:16:54.160><c> get</c><00:16:54.399><c> details</c><00:16:54.959><c> about</c><00:16:55.279><c> them</c><00:16:55.519><c> so</c><00:16:55.839><c> it's</c>

00:16:56.069 --> 00:16:56.079 align:start position:0%
I can get details about them so it's
 

00:16:56.079 --> 00:17:01.269 align:start position:0%
I can get details about them so it's
just<00:16:56.399><c> really</c><00:16:57.839><c> super</c><00:16:59.040><c> fascinating</c><00:17:00.079><c> very</c>

00:17:01.269 --> 00:17:01.279 align:start position:0%
just really super fascinating very
 

00:17:01.279 --> 00:17:04.630 align:start position:0%
just really super fascinating very
helpful<00:17:01.920><c> has</c><00:17:02.240><c> made</c><00:17:02.639><c> this</c><00:17:03.040><c> feature</c><00:17:04.240><c> I</c><00:17:04.480><c> would</c>

00:17:04.630 --> 00:17:04.640 align:start position:0%
helpful has made this feature I would
 

00:17:04.640 --> 00:17:08.549 align:start position:0%
helpful has made this feature I would
say<00:17:05.679><c> probably</c><00:17:06.240><c> more</c><00:17:07.199><c> margin</c><00:17:07.679><c> accretive</c><00:17:08.160><c> to</c><00:17:08.400><c> my</c>

00:17:08.549 --> 00:17:08.559 align:start position:0%
say probably more margin accretive to my
 

00:17:08.559 --> 00:17:10.630 align:start position:0%
say probably more margin accretive to my
business<00:17:08.880><c> if</c><00:17:09.039><c> you</c><00:17:09.199><c> all</c><00:17:09.360><c> know</c><00:17:09.439><c> what</c><00:17:09.679><c> that</c><00:17:09.839><c> means</c>

00:17:10.630 --> 00:17:10.640 align:start position:0%
business if you all know what that means
 

00:17:10.640 --> 00:17:12.630 align:start position:0%
business if you all know what that means
because<00:17:11.199><c> before</c><00:17:11.679><c> I</c><00:17:11.919><c> was</c><00:17:12.079><c> really</c><00:17:12.240><c> like</c><00:17:12.480><c> trying</c>

00:17:12.630 --> 00:17:12.640 align:start position:0%
because before I was really like trying
 

00:17:12.640 --> 00:17:15.029 align:start position:0%
because before I was really like trying
to<00:17:12.799><c> brute</c><00:17:13.199><c> force</c><00:17:13.520><c> with</c><00:17:13.760><c> these</c><00:17:14.079><c> like</c><00:17:14.319><c> brainy</c>

00:17:15.029 --> 00:17:15.039 align:start position:0%
to brute force with these like brainy
 

00:17:15.039 --> 00:17:18.150 align:start position:0%
to brute force with these like brainy
models,<00:17:16.319><c> what</c><00:17:16.959><c> I</c><00:17:17.199><c> needed</c><00:17:17.439><c> to</c><00:17:17.600><c> work</c><00:17:17.679><c> on</c><00:17:17.839><c> and</c><00:17:18.079><c> how</c>

00:17:18.150 --> 00:17:18.160 align:start position:0%
models, what I needed to work on and how
 

00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:19.750 align:start position:0%
models, what I needed to work on and how
I<00:17:18.319><c> could</c><00:17:18.400><c> do</c><00:17:18.559><c> this</c><00:17:18.720><c> data.</c><00:17:18.959><c> And</c><00:17:19.120><c> now</c><00:17:19.280><c> I</c><00:17:19.439><c> can</c><00:17:19.600><c> like</c>

00:17:19.750 --> 00:17:19.760 align:start position:0%
I could do this data. And now I can like
 

00:17:19.760 --> 00:17:21.990 align:start position:0%
I could do this data. And now I can like
combine<00:17:20.160><c> these</c><00:17:20.480><c> like</c><00:17:20.720><c> very</c><00:17:21.120><c> cheap</c><00:17:21.520><c> decision</c>

00:17:21.990 --> 00:17:22.000 align:start position:0%
combine these like very cheap decision
 

00:17:22.000 --> 00:17:24.309 align:start position:0%
combine these like very cheap decision
models<00:17:22.319><c> like</c><00:17:22.559><c> Jev</c><00:17:23.280><c> with</c><00:17:23.520><c> a</c><00:17:23.679><c> really</c><00:17:23.919><c> brainy</c>

00:17:24.309 --> 00:17:24.319 align:start position:0%
models like Jev with a really brainy
 

00:17:24.319 --> 00:17:27.510 align:start position:0%
models like Jev with a really brainy
model<00:17:24.640><c> and</c><00:17:24.959><c> get</c><00:17:25.199><c> this</c><00:17:25.520><c> like</c><00:17:26.079><c> interesting</c>

00:17:27.510 --> 00:17:27.520 align:start position:0%
model and get this like interesting
 

00:17:27.520 --> 00:17:30.870 align:start position:0%
model and get this like interesting
completely<00:17:28.319><c> hard</c><00:17:28.720><c> to</c><00:17:29.039><c> generate</c><00:17:29.919><c> set</c><00:17:30.160><c> of</c><00:17:30.320><c> data</c>

00:17:30.870 --> 00:17:30.880 align:start position:0%
completely hard to generate set of data
 

00:17:30.880 --> 00:17:35.669 align:start position:0%
completely hard to generate set of data
context<00:17:32.080><c> like</c><00:17:33.280><c> auto</c><00:17:33.600><c> wiki.</c><00:17:34.480><c> It's</c><00:17:34.720><c> like</c><00:17:35.039><c> really</c>

00:17:35.669 --> 00:17:35.679 align:start position:0%
context like auto wiki. It's like really
 

00:17:35.679 --> 00:17:38.390 align:start position:0%
context like auto wiki. It's like really
unlocked<00:17:36.240><c> this</c><00:17:36.480><c> product</c><00:17:37.280><c> and</c><00:17:37.679><c> it</c><00:17:37.919><c> has</c><00:17:38.080><c> taken</c>

00:17:38.390 --> 00:17:38.400 align:start position:0%
unlocked this product and it has taken
 

00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:40.710 align:start position:0%
unlocked this product and it has taken
about,00

00:17:40.710 --> 00:17:40.720 align:start position:0%
about,00
 

00:17:40.720 --> 00:17:43.669 align:start position:0%
about,00
raw<00:17:41.039><c> sources</c><00:17:41.440><c> of</c><00:17:41.600><c> data</c><00:17:42.400><c> and</c><00:17:42.640><c> done</c><00:17:42.960><c> over</c><00:17:43.200><c> like</c>

00:17:43.669 --> 00:17:43.679 align:start position:0%
raw sources of data and done over like
 

00:17:43.679 --> 00:17:45.190 align:start position:0%
raw sources of data and done over like
200,000

00:17:45.190 --> 00:17:45.200 align:start position:0%
200,000
 

00:17:45.200 --> 00:17:47.669 align:start position:0%
200,000
classification<00:17:46.000><c> and</c><00:17:46.160><c> pair-wise</c><00:17:46.720><c> groupings</c>

00:17:47.669 --> 00:17:47.679 align:start position:0%
classification and pair-wise groupings
 

00:17:47.679 --> 00:17:50.150 align:start position:0%
classification and pair-wise groupings
and<00:17:48.160><c> it</c><00:17:48.400><c> probably</c><00:17:48.720><c> cost</c><00:17:48.960><c> me</c><00:17:49.200><c> four</c><00:17:49.440><c> bucks</c><00:17:49.919><c> on</c>

00:17:50.150 --> 00:17:50.160 align:start position:0%
and it probably cost me four bucks on
 

00:17:50.160 --> 00:17:51.510 align:start position:0%
and it probably cost me four bucks on
the<00:17:50.240><c> Jeff</c><00:17:50.559><c> side.</c><00:17:50.799><c> It's</c><00:17:50.960><c> cost</c><00:17:51.120><c> me</c><00:17:51.200><c> a</c><00:17:51.280><c> lot</c><00:17:51.440><c> more</c>

00:17:51.510 --> 00:17:51.520 align:start position:0%
the Jeff side. It's cost me a lot more
 

00:17:51.520 --> 00:17:54.470 align:start position:0%
the Jeff side. It's cost me a lot more
on<00:17:51.679><c> the</c><00:17:51.760><c> Astra</c><00:17:52.160><c> side.</c><00:17:53.120><c> But</c><00:17:53.360><c> I</c><00:17:53.600><c> just</c><00:17:53.760><c> think</c><00:17:53.919><c> like</c>

00:17:54.470 --> 00:17:54.480 align:start position:0%
on the Astra side. But I just think like
 

00:17:54.480 --> 00:17:57.830 align:start position:0%
on the Astra side. But I just think like
thinking<00:17:55.039><c> through</c><00:17:55.840><c> where</c><00:17:57.120><c> classification</c>

00:17:57.830 --> 00:17:57.840 align:start position:0%
thinking through where classification
 

00:17:57.840 --> 00:17:59.270 align:start position:0%
thinking through where classification
like<00:17:58.080><c> super</c><00:17:58.320><c> smart</c><00:17:58.559><c> classification</c>

00:17:59.270 --> 00:17:59.280 align:start position:0%
like super smart classification
 

00:17:59.280 --> 00:18:02.630 align:start position:0%
like super smart classification
clustering<00:18:00.240><c> decisions</c><00:18:00.960><c> could</c><00:18:01.600><c> unlock</c><00:18:02.240><c> really</c>

00:18:02.630 --> 00:18:02.640 align:start position:0%
clustering decisions could unlock really
 

00:18:02.640 --> 00:18:05.590 align:start position:0%
clustering decisions could unlock really
complex<00:18:03.760><c> products</c><00:18:04.240><c> and</c><00:18:04.559><c> how</c><00:18:04.880><c> you</c><00:18:05.120><c> might</c><00:18:05.360><c> use</c>

00:18:05.590 --> 00:18:05.600 align:start position:0%
complex products and how you might use
 

00:18:05.600 --> 00:18:08.549 align:start position:0%
complex products and how you might use
as<00:18:05.840><c> I'm</c><00:18:06.000><c> showing</c><00:18:06.240><c> here</c><00:18:06.960><c> Jev</c><00:18:07.520><c> alongside</c><00:18:08.160><c> some</c>

00:18:08.549 --> 00:18:08.559 align:start position:0%
as I'm showing here Jev alongside some
 

00:18:08.559 --> 00:18:11.430 align:start position:0%
as I'm showing here Jev alongside some
smarter<00:18:09.039><c> models.</c><00:18:10.480><c> It's</c><00:18:10.720><c> like</c><00:18:10.960><c> really</c><00:18:11.200><c> blowing</c>

00:18:11.430 --> 00:18:11.440 align:start position:0%
smarter models. It's like really blowing
 

00:18:11.440 --> 00:18:13.350 align:start position:0%
smarter models. It's like really blowing
my<00:18:11.679><c> mind</c><00:18:11.840><c> right</c><00:18:12.000><c> now</c><00:18:12.160><c> and</c><00:18:12.320><c> I</c><00:18:12.480><c> think</c><00:18:12.559><c> is</c><00:18:13.039><c> it</c>

00:18:13.350 --> 00:18:13.360 align:start position:0%
my mind right now and I think is it
 

00:18:13.360 --> 00:18:14.710 align:start position:0%
my mind right now and I think is it
should<00:18:13.600><c> be</c><00:18:13.760><c> interesting</c><00:18:14.080><c> for</c><00:18:14.320><c> those</c><00:18:14.559><c> out</c>

00:18:14.710 --> 00:18:14.720 align:start position:0%
should be interesting for those out
 

00:18:14.720 --> 00:18:17.110 align:start position:0%
should be interesting for those out
there<00:18:15.039><c> building</c><00:18:15.600><c> interesting</c><00:18:16.240><c> data</c>

00:18:17.110 --> 00:18:17.120 align:start position:0%
there building interesting data
 

00:18:17.120 --> 00:18:19.350 align:start position:0%
there building interesting data
products.<00:18:18.000><c> So,</c><00:18:18.320><c> so</c><00:18:18.480><c> far</c><00:18:18.640><c> I've</c><00:18:18.880><c> told</c><00:18:19.039><c> you</c><00:18:19.200><c> like</c>

00:18:19.350 --> 00:18:19.360 align:start position:0%
products. So, so far I've told you like
 

00:18:19.360 --> 00:18:22.470 align:start position:0%
products. So, so far I've told you like
what<00:18:19.600><c> Jeb</c><00:18:19.919><c> is,</c><00:18:20.720><c> how</c><00:18:20.960><c> you</c><00:18:21.120><c> can</c><00:18:21.280><c> use</c><00:18:21.440><c> it</c><00:18:21.679><c> on</c><00:18:22.000><c> PR</c>

00:18:22.470 --> 00:18:22.480 align:start position:0%
what Jeb is, how you can use it on PR
 

00:18:22.480 --> 00:18:24.549 align:start position:0%
what Jeb is, how you can use it on PR
review<00:18:22.799><c> or</c><00:18:23.120><c> data</c><00:18:23.440><c> analysis,</c><00:18:24.080><c> how</c><00:18:24.240><c> you</c><00:18:24.320><c> can</c><00:18:24.400><c> use</c>

00:18:24.549 --> 00:18:24.559 align:start position:0%
review or data analysis, how you can use
 

00:18:24.559 --> 00:18:26.310 align:start position:0%
review or data analysis, how you can use
it<00:18:24.640><c> on</c><00:18:24.880><c> your</c><00:18:25.039><c> local</c><00:18:25.440><c> sessions,</c><00:18:25.919><c> how</c><00:18:26.080><c> you</c><00:18:26.240><c> could</c>

00:18:26.310 --> 00:18:26.320 align:start position:0%
it on your local sessions, how you could
 

00:18:26.320 --> 00:18:28.549 align:start position:0%
it on your local sessions, how you could
even<00:18:26.559><c> use</c><00:18:26.720><c> it</c><00:18:27.280><c> on</c><00:18:27.520><c> your</c><00:18:27.760><c> email,</c><00:18:28.160><c> but</c><00:18:28.320><c> I'm</c><00:18:28.480><c> going</c>

00:18:28.549 --> 00:18:28.559 align:start position:0%
even use it on your email, but I'm going
 

00:18:28.559 --> 00:18:31.750 align:start position:0%
even use it on your email, but I'm going
to<00:18:28.799><c> show</c><00:18:28.960><c> you</c><00:18:30.240><c> two</c><00:18:30.480><c> things</c><00:18:30.720><c> that</c><00:18:30.960><c> I</c><00:18:31.200><c> built</c><00:18:31.520><c> with</c>

00:18:31.750 --> 00:18:31.760 align:start position:0%
to show you two things that I built with
 

00:18:31.760 --> 00:18:34.630 align:start position:0%
to show you two things that I built with
it<00:18:32.480><c> in</c><00:18:33.200><c> an</c><00:18:33.520><c> afternoon</c><00:18:34.000><c> that</c><00:18:34.240><c> I</c><00:18:34.400><c> think</c><00:18:34.480><c> are</c>

00:18:34.630 --> 00:18:34.640 align:start position:0%
it in an afternoon that I think are
 

00:18:34.640 --> 00:18:36.710 align:start position:0%
it in an afternoon that I think are
really<00:18:34.799><c> cool.</c><00:18:35.039><c> And</c><00:18:35.280><c> this</c><00:18:35.440><c> is</c><00:18:35.600><c> my</c><00:18:35.840><c> attempt</c><00:18:36.480><c> to</c>

00:18:36.710 --> 00:18:36.720 align:start position:0%
really cool. And this is my attempt to
 

00:18:36.720 --> 00:18:40.150 align:start position:0%
really cool. And this is my attempt to
like<00:18:37.120><c> go</c><00:18:37.440><c> against</c><00:18:37.919><c> the</c><00:18:39.039><c> like</c><00:18:39.360><c> eyepopping</c>

00:18:40.150 --> 00:18:40.160 align:start position:0%
like go against the like eyepopping
 

00:18:40.160 --> 00:18:43.669 align:start position:0%
like go against the like eyepopping
demos<00:18:40.559><c> that</c><00:18:40.799><c> you're</c><00:18:41.039><c> seeing</c><00:18:41.440><c> on</c><00:18:42.320><c> X.</c><00:18:43.280><c> I</c><00:18:43.520><c> think</c>

00:18:43.669 --> 00:18:43.679 align:start position:0%
demos that you're seeing on X. I think
 

00:18:43.679 --> 00:18:45.270 align:start position:0%
demos that you're seeing on X. I think
people<00:18:43.840><c> have</c><00:18:44.160><c> shown</c><00:18:44.640><c> interesting</c><00:18:45.039><c> things,</c>

00:18:45.270 --> 00:18:45.280 align:start position:0%
people have shown interesting things,
 

00:18:45.280 --> 00:18:47.990 align:start position:0%
people have shown interesting things,
but<00:18:45.520><c> they</c><00:18:45.760><c> actually</c><00:18:46.080><c> haven't</c><00:18:46.400><c> shown</c><00:18:47.520><c> how</c><00:18:47.760><c> you</c>

00:18:47.990 --> 00:18:48.000 align:start position:0%
but they actually haven't shown how you
 

00:18:48.000 --> 00:18:49.590 align:start position:0%
but they actually haven't shown how you
have<00:18:48.080><c> to</c><00:18:48.240><c> build</c><00:18:48.400><c> it</c><00:18:48.559><c> and</c><00:18:48.799><c> how</c><00:18:48.960><c> it</c><00:18:49.120><c> works</c><00:18:49.280><c> to</c><00:18:49.520><c> get</c>

00:18:49.590 --> 00:18:49.600 align:start position:0%
have to build it and how it works to get
 

00:18:49.600 --> 00:18:51.190 align:start position:0%
have to build it and how it works to get
that<00:18:49.840><c> real-time</c><00:18:50.240><c> effect.</c><00:18:50.559><c> And</c><00:18:50.720><c> so,</c><00:18:50.880><c> I'm</c><00:18:51.039><c> going</c>

00:18:51.190 --> 00:18:51.200 align:start position:0%
that real-time effect. And so, I'm going
 

00:18:51.200 --> 00:18:55.110 align:start position:0%
that real-time effect. And so, I'm going
to<00:18:51.360><c> show</c><00:18:51.520><c> you</c><00:18:51.679><c> these</c><00:18:52.000><c> apps</c><00:18:53.200><c> live</c><00:18:54.320><c> because</c><00:18:54.799><c> I</c>

00:18:55.110 --> 00:18:55.120 align:start position:0%
to show you these apps live because I
 

00:18:55.120 --> 00:18:56.390 align:start position:0%
to show you these apps live because I
think<00:18:55.200><c> it's</c><00:18:55.520><c> important</c><00:18:55.760><c> to</c><00:18:56.000><c> kind</c><00:18:56.080><c> of</c><00:18:56.160><c> like</c>

00:18:56.390 --> 00:18:56.400 align:start position:0%
think it's important to kind of like
 

00:18:56.400 --> 00:18:57.750 align:start position:0%
think it's important to kind of like
understand<00:18:56.720><c> where</c><00:18:56.880><c> the</c><00:18:57.039><c> latency</c><00:18:57.440><c> comes</c><00:18:57.600><c> from</c>

00:18:57.750 --> 00:18:57.760 align:start position:0%
understand where the latency comes from
 

00:18:57.760 --> 00:18:59.350 align:start position:0%
understand where the latency comes from
and<00:18:57.919><c> what</c><00:18:58.080><c> the</c><00:18:58.240><c> real</c><00:18:58.480><c> experience</c><00:18:58.880><c> is</c><00:18:59.120><c> as</c>

00:18:59.350 --> 00:18:59.360 align:start position:0%
and what the real experience is as
 

00:18:59.360 --> 00:19:01.750 align:start position:0%
and what the real experience is as
opposed<00:18:59.600><c> to</c><00:18:59.840><c> like</c><00:19:00.080><c> kind</c><00:19:00.320><c> of</c><00:19:00.400><c> a</c><00:19:01.440><c> 30-se</c>

00:19:01.750 --> 00:19:01.760 align:start position:0%
opposed to like kind of a 30-se
 

00:19:01.760 --> 00:19:04.630 align:start position:0%
opposed to like kind of a 30-se
secondond<00:19:02.080><c> demo</c><00:19:02.480><c> that</c><00:19:02.720><c> goes</c><00:19:03.039><c> goes</c><00:19:03.360><c> viral.</c><00:19:04.480><c> But</c>

00:19:04.630 --> 00:19:04.640 align:start position:0%
secondond demo that goes goes viral. But
 

00:19:04.640 --> 00:19:06.150 align:start position:0%
secondond demo that goes goes viral. But
I<00:19:04.880><c> do</c><00:19:05.039><c> think</c><00:19:05.120><c> it</c><00:19:05.360><c> shows</c><00:19:05.600><c> some</c><00:19:05.760><c> like</c><00:19:06.000><c> pretty</c>

00:19:06.150 --> 00:19:06.160 align:start position:0%
I do think it shows some like pretty
 

00:19:06.160 --> 00:19:08.310 align:start position:0%
I do think it shows some like pretty
cool<00:19:06.320><c> stuff.</c><00:19:06.640><c> So</c><00:19:06.880><c> the</c><00:19:07.200><c> first</c><00:19:07.360><c> one</c><00:19:07.679><c> I</c><00:19:08.000><c> want</c><00:19:08.080><c> to</c>

00:19:08.310 --> 00:19:08.320 align:start position:0%
cool stuff. So the first one I want to
 

00:19:08.320 --> 00:19:10.870 align:start position:0%
cool stuff. So the first one I want to
do<00:19:09.360><c> is</c>

00:19:10.870 --> 00:19:10.880 align:start position:0%
do is
 

00:19:10.880 --> 00:19:14.630 align:start position:0%
do is
how<00:19:11.200><c> I</c><00:19:11.520><c> AI</c><00:19:12.080><c> audience</c><00:19:12.799><c> signals.</c><00:19:13.520><c> So</c><00:19:14.320><c> you</c>

00:19:14.630 --> 00:19:14.640 align:start position:0%
how I AI audience signals. So you
 

00:19:14.640 --> 00:19:17.350 align:start position:0%
how I AI audience signals. So you
wonderful<00:19:15.200><c> people</c><00:19:15.919><c> give</c><00:19:16.160><c> us</c><00:19:16.400><c> comments</c><00:19:16.880><c> on</c><00:19:17.200><c> the</c>

00:19:17.350 --> 00:19:17.360 align:start position:0%
wonderful people give us comments on the
 

00:19:17.360 --> 00:19:21.510 align:start position:0%
wonderful people give us comments on the
how<00:19:17.520><c> I</c><00:19:17.760><c> AI</c><00:19:18.160><c> podcast</c><00:19:19.360><c> and</c><00:19:19.919><c> I</c><00:19:20.960><c> go</c><00:19:21.120><c> through</c><00:19:21.280><c> them.</c>

00:19:21.510 --> 00:19:21.520 align:start position:0%
how I AI podcast and I go through them.
 

00:19:21.520 --> 00:19:23.029 align:start position:0%
how I AI podcast and I go through them.
I<00:19:21.679><c> read</c><00:19:21.840><c> them</c><00:19:22.000><c> every</c><00:19:22.160><c> day</c><00:19:22.320><c> and</c><00:19:22.480><c> I</c><00:19:22.640><c> reply</c><00:19:22.880><c> to</c>

00:19:23.029 --> 00:19:23.039 align:start position:0%
I read them every day and I reply to
 

00:19:23.039 --> 00:19:25.110 align:start position:0%
I read them every day and I reply to
them<00:19:23.200><c> when</c><00:19:23.360><c> I</c><00:19:23.520><c> can,</c><00:19:23.919><c> but</c><00:19:24.160><c> I've</c><00:19:24.400><c> never</c><00:19:24.559><c> done</c>

00:19:25.110 --> 00:19:25.120 align:start position:0%
them when I can, but I've never done
 

00:19:25.120 --> 00:19:28.390 align:start position:0%
them when I can, but I've never done
analysis<00:19:25.840><c> on</c><00:19:26.080><c> them.</c><00:19:26.960><c> And</c><00:19:27.280><c> there's</c><00:19:27.600><c> about</c>

00:19:28.390 --> 00:19:28.400 align:start position:0%
analysis on them. And there's about
 

00:19:28.400 --> 00:19:31.110 align:start position:0%
analysis on them. And there's about
4,500<00:19:29.280><c> comments</c><00:19:30.160><c> and</c><00:19:30.400><c> I</c><00:19:30.559><c> just</c><00:19:30.720><c> wanted</c><00:19:30.880><c> to</c><00:19:30.960><c> know</c>

00:19:31.110 --> 00:19:31.120 align:start position:0%
4,500 comments and I just wanted to know
 

00:19:31.120 --> 00:19:32.549 align:start position:0%
4,500 comments and I just wanted to know
like<00:19:31.280><c> are</c><00:19:31.440><c> they</c><00:19:31.600><c> good,</c><00:19:31.840><c> are</c><00:19:32.000><c> they</c><00:19:32.160><c> bad,</c><00:19:32.400><c> are</c>

00:19:32.549 --> 00:19:32.559 align:start position:0%
like are they good, are they bad, are
 

00:19:32.559 --> 00:19:34.310 align:start position:0%
like are they good, are they bad, are
they<00:19:32.720><c> happy,</c><00:19:33.039><c> are</c><00:19:33.120><c> they</c><00:19:33.280><c> sad?</c><00:19:33.600><c> And</c><00:19:33.760><c> I</c><00:19:34.000><c> also</c>

00:19:34.310 --> 00:19:34.320 align:start position:0%
they happy, are they sad? And I also
 

00:19:34.320 --> 00:19:36.070 align:start position:0%
they happy, are they sad? And I also
wanted<00:19:34.559><c> to</c><00:19:34.720><c> know</c><00:19:34.880><c> if</c><00:19:35.120><c> you</c><00:19:35.280><c> all</c><00:19:35.440><c> had</c><00:19:35.679><c> any</c>

00:19:36.070 --> 00:19:36.080 align:start position:0%
wanted to know if you all had any
 

00:19:36.080 --> 00:19:39.110 align:start position:0%
wanted to know if you all had any
episode<00:19:36.559><c> ideas</c><00:19:37.200><c> for</c><00:19:37.520><c> me</c><00:19:38.320><c> where</c><00:19:38.640><c> I</c><00:19:38.960><c> could</c>

00:19:39.110 --> 00:19:39.120 align:start position:0%
episode ideas for me where I could
 

00:19:39.120 --> 00:19:40.630 align:start position:0%
episode ideas for me where I could
extract<00:19:39.440><c> them</c><00:19:39.600><c> and</c><00:19:39.840><c> come</c><00:19:39.919><c> up</c><00:19:40.080><c> with</c><00:19:40.320><c> episodes</c>

00:19:40.630 --> 00:19:40.640 align:start position:0%
extract them and come up with episodes
 

00:19:40.640 --> 00:19:43.110 align:start position:0%
extract them and come up with episodes
that<00:19:40.799><c> I</c><00:19:40.960><c> could</c><00:19:41.120><c> do</c><00:19:41.360><c> like</c><00:19:41.679><c> this</c><00:19:41.919><c> Jeff</c><00:19:42.240><c> one.</c><00:19:42.880><c> And</c>

00:19:43.110 --> 00:19:43.120 align:start position:0%
that I could do like this Jeff one. And
 

00:19:43.120 --> 00:19:46.630 align:start position:0%
that I could do like this Jeff one. And
so<00:19:43.360><c> I</c><00:19:43.600><c> hooked</c><00:19:43.840><c> up</c><00:19:44.080><c> the</c><00:19:44.640><c> YouTube</c><00:19:45.280><c> V3</c><00:19:45.840><c> API.</c><00:19:46.480><c> You</c>

00:19:46.630 --> 00:19:46.640 align:start position:0%
so I hooked up the YouTube V3 API. You
 

00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:48.230 align:start position:0%
so I hooked up the YouTube V3 API. You
just<00:19:46.799><c> have</c><00:19:46.880><c> to</c><00:19:46.960><c> enable</c><00:19:47.280><c> it</c><00:19:47.360><c> in</c><00:19:47.600><c> Google</c>

00:19:48.230 --> 00:19:48.240 align:start position:0%
just have to enable it in Google
 

00:19:48.240 --> 00:19:51.990 align:start position:0%
just have to enable it in Google
console.<00:19:49.679><c> And</c><00:19:49.919><c> then</c><00:19:50.240><c> I</c><00:19:50.720><c> said</c><00:19:51.440><c> pull</c><00:19:51.679><c> all</c><00:19:51.840><c> the</c>

00:19:51.990 --> 00:19:52.000 align:start position:0%
console. And then I said pull all the
 

00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:54.310 align:start position:0%
console. And then I said pull all the
comments<00:19:52.400><c> and</c><00:19:52.640><c> categorize</c><00:19:53.280><c> them</c><00:19:53.840><c> into</c>

00:19:54.310 --> 00:19:54.320 align:start position:0%
comments and categorize them into
 

00:19:54.320 --> 00:19:57.110 align:start position:0%
comments and categorize them into
positive,<00:19:54.799><c> negative</c><00:19:55.120><c> or</c><00:19:55.360><c> neutral.</c><00:19:56.720><c> So</c><00:19:56.880><c> that</c>

00:19:57.110 --> 00:19:57.120 align:start position:0%
positive, negative or neutral. So that
 

00:19:57.120 --> 00:19:58.789 align:start position:0%
positive, negative or neutral. So that
would<00:19:57.280><c> be</c><00:19:57.360><c> a</c><00:19:57.520><c> choice,</c><00:19:57.840><c> right?</c><00:19:58.080><c> Or</c><00:19:58.240><c> a</c><00:19:58.400><c> score</c>

00:19:58.789 --> 00:19:58.799 align:start position:0%
would be a choice, right? Or a score
 

00:19:58.799 --> 00:20:00.870 align:start position:0%
would be a choice, right? Or a score
probably.<00:19:59.360><c> And</c><00:19:59.520><c> then</c><00:19:59.679><c> I</c><00:19:59.840><c> said</c><00:20:00.000><c> also</c><00:20:00.320><c> use</c><00:20:00.480><c> Jev</c>

00:20:00.870 --> 00:20:00.880 align:start position:0%
probably. And then I said also use Jev
 

00:20:00.880 --> 00:20:03.029 align:start position:0%
probably. And then I said also use Jev
to<00:20:01.200><c> identify</c><00:20:01.600><c> whether</c><00:20:01.840><c> or</c><00:20:01.919><c> not</c><00:20:02.160><c> includes</c><00:20:02.720><c> a</c>

00:20:03.029 --> 00:20:03.039 align:start position:0%
to identify whether or not includes a
 

00:20:03.039 --> 00:20:06.230 align:start position:0%
to identify whether or not includes a
idea<00:20:03.360><c> for</c><00:20:03.679><c> a</c><00:20:03.919><c> future</c><00:20:04.240><c> episode</c><00:20:05.120><c> and</c><00:20:05.360><c> then</c>

00:20:06.230 --> 00:20:06.240 align:start position:0%
idea for a future episode and then
 

00:20:06.240 --> 00:20:08.870 align:start position:0%
idea for a future episode and then
analyze<00:20:07.440><c> all</c><00:20:07.679><c> the</c><00:20:07.840><c> data</c><00:20:08.080><c> and</c><00:20:08.400><c> give</c><00:20:08.559><c> me</c><00:20:08.640><c> a</c>

00:20:08.870 --> 00:20:08.880 align:start position:0%
analyze all the data and give me a
 

00:20:08.880 --> 00:20:10.950 align:start position:0%
analyze all the data and give me a
dashboard<00:20:09.280><c> to</c><00:20:09.520><c> look</c><00:20:09.679><c> at</c><00:20:09.760><c> the</c><00:20:09.919><c> data.</c><00:20:10.640><c> And</c><00:20:10.799><c> so</c>

00:20:10.950 --> 00:20:10.960 align:start position:0%
dashboard to look at the data. And so
 

00:20:10.960 --> 00:20:13.430 align:start position:0%
dashboard to look at the data. And so
you<00:20:11.200><c> can</c><00:20:11.360><c> see</c><00:20:11.520><c> here</c><00:20:12.240><c> about</c><00:20:12.559><c> half</c><00:20:12.960><c> are</c>

00:20:13.430 --> 00:20:13.440 align:start position:0%
you can see here about half are
 

00:20:13.440 --> 00:20:16.710 align:start position:0%
you can see here about half are
positive.<00:20:14.559><c> There</c><00:20:14.720><c> are</c><00:20:15.039><c> 58</c><00:20:15.840><c> comments</c><00:20:16.240><c> in</c><00:20:16.480><c> here</c>

00:20:16.710 --> 00:20:16.720 align:start position:0%
positive. There are 58 comments in here
 

00:20:16.720 --> 00:20:19.510 align:start position:0%
positive. There are 58 comments in here
with<00:20:17.200><c> episode</c><00:20:17.760><c> ideas</c><00:20:18.400><c> and</c><00:20:18.640><c> then</c><00:20:18.799><c> there's</c><00:20:19.120><c> like</c>

00:20:19.510 --> 00:20:19.520 align:start position:0%
with episode ideas and then there's like
 

00:20:19.520 --> 00:20:22.390 align:start position:0%
with episode ideas and then there's like
quality<00:20:20.400><c> praise</c><00:20:20.880><c> which</c><00:20:21.120><c> is</c><00:20:21.600><c> praise</c><00:20:22.000><c> for</c><00:20:22.240><c> our</c>

00:20:22.390 --> 00:20:22.400 align:start position:0%
quality praise which is praise for our
 

00:20:22.400 --> 00:20:24.470 align:start position:0%
quality praise which is praise for our
production<00:20:22.799><c> team</c><00:20:23.360><c> which</c><00:20:23.600><c> is</c><00:20:23.760><c> like</c><00:20:23.919><c> how</c><00:20:24.160><c> nice</c>

00:20:24.470 --> 00:20:24.480 align:start position:0%
production team which is like how nice
 

00:20:24.480 --> 00:20:28.070 align:start position:0%
production team which is like how nice
the<00:20:24.799><c> podcast</c><00:20:25.919><c> looks.</c><00:20:26.880><c> And</c><00:20:27.200><c> so</c><00:20:27.520><c> then</c><00:20:27.760><c> it</c><00:20:27.919><c> made</c>

00:20:28.070 --> 00:20:28.080 align:start position:0%
the podcast looks. And so then it made
 

00:20:28.080 --> 00:20:31.110 align:start position:0%
the podcast looks. And so then it made
me<00:20:28.240><c> this</c><00:20:28.480><c> dashboard</c><00:20:29.200><c> which</c><00:20:29.520><c> is</c><00:20:29.840><c> telling</c><00:20:30.159><c> me</c><00:20:30.960><c> is</c>

00:20:31.110 --> 00:20:31.120 align:start position:0%
me this dashboard which is telling me is
 

00:20:31.120 --> 00:20:33.669 align:start position:0%
me this dashboard which is telling me is
it<00:20:31.280><c> positive,</c><00:20:31.760><c> neutral,</c><00:20:32.240><c> negative</c><00:20:32.559><c> or</c><00:20:32.880><c> mixed.</c>

00:20:33.669 --> 00:20:33.679 align:start position:0%
it positive, neutral, negative or mixed.
 

00:20:33.679 --> 00:20:35.669 align:start position:0%
it positive, neutral, negative or mixed.
And<00:20:33.840><c> then</c><00:20:34.000><c> it</c><00:20:34.240><c> gave</c><00:20:34.400><c> me</c><00:20:34.559><c> an</c><00:20:34.720><c> audience</c><00:20:35.200><c> request</c>

00:20:35.669 --> 00:20:35.679 align:start position:0%
And then it gave me an audience request
 

00:20:35.679 --> 00:20:38.070 align:start position:0%
And then it gave me an audience request
board.<00:20:36.080><c> So</c><00:20:36.320><c> you</c><00:20:36.480><c> all</c><00:20:36.720><c> want</c><00:20:36.880><c> like</c><00:20:37.520><c> openw</c><00:20:37.840><c> weight</c>

00:20:38.070 --> 00:20:38.080 align:start position:0%
board. So you all want like openw weight
 

00:20:38.080 --> 00:20:39.909 align:start position:0%
board. So you all want like openw weight
models,<00:20:38.640><c> you</c><00:20:38.720><c> want</c><00:20:38.960><c> instinct,</c><00:20:39.600><c> you</c><00:20:39.760><c> really</c>

00:20:39.909 --> 00:20:39.919 align:start position:0%
models, you want instinct, you really
 

00:20:39.919 --> 00:20:41.669 align:start position:0%
models, you want instinct, you really
want<00:20:40.080><c> a</c><00:20:40.240><c> comparison</c><00:20:40.480><c> of</c><00:20:40.640><c> Grock</c><00:20:40.960><c> and</c><00:20:41.120><c> Muse</c><00:20:41.440><c> for</c>

00:20:41.669 --> 00:20:41.679 align:start position:0%
want a comparison of Grock and Muse for
 

00:20:41.679 --> 00:20:43.669 align:start position:0%
want a comparison of Grock and Muse for
personal<00:20:42.000><c> use.</c><00:20:42.320><c> That's</c><00:20:42.559><c> coming</c><00:20:42.799><c> soon.</c><00:20:43.520><c> And</c>

00:20:43.669 --> 00:20:43.679 align:start position:0%
personal use. That's coming soon. And
 

00:20:43.679 --> 00:20:45.990 align:start position:0%
personal use. That's coming soon. And
then<00:20:43.919><c> do</c><00:20:44.080><c> I</c><00:20:44.240><c> use</c><00:20:44.480><c> Grock</c><00:20:44.799><c> or</c><00:20:45.039><c> Brockbot</c><00:20:45.600><c> or</c><00:20:45.840><c> like</c>

00:20:45.990 --> 00:20:46.000 align:start position:0%
then do I use Grock or Brockbot or like
 

00:20:46.000 --> 00:20:49.110 align:start position:0%
then do I use Grock or Brockbot or like
what<00:20:46.240><c> am</c><00:20:46.320><c> I</c><00:20:46.559><c> using?</c><00:20:47.760><c> And</c><00:20:48.000><c> then</c><00:20:48.320><c> you</c><00:20:48.640><c> can</c><00:20:48.799><c> also</c>

00:20:49.110 --> 00:20:49.120 align:start position:0%
what am I using? And then you can also
 

00:20:49.120 --> 00:20:53.830 align:start position:0%
what am I using? And then you can also
see<00:20:50.080><c> by</c><00:20:50.799><c> episode</c><00:20:51.760><c> the</c><00:20:52.080><c> sentiment</c><00:20:53.120><c> which</c><00:20:53.440><c> is</c>

00:20:53.830 --> 00:20:53.840 align:start position:0%
see by episode the sentiment which is
 

00:20:53.840 --> 00:20:56.549 align:start position:0%
see by episode the sentiment which is
Ryan's<00:20:54.400><c> very</c><00:20:54.720><c> popular</c><00:20:55.440><c> three-step</c><00:20:55.919><c> AI</c><00:20:56.240><c> coding</c>

00:20:56.549 --> 00:20:56.559 align:start position:0%
Ryan's very popular three-step AI coding
 

00:20:56.559 --> 00:20:58.950 align:start position:0%
Ryan's very popular three-step AI coding
workflow.<00:20:57.120><c> 61%</c>

00:20:58.950 --> 00:20:58.960 align:start position:0%
workflow. 61%
 

00:20:58.960 --> 00:21:00.789 align:start position:0%
workflow. 61%
positive.<00:20:59.600><c> We</c><00:20:59.840><c> had</c><00:20:59.919><c> an</c><00:21:00.080><c> awesome</c><00:21:00.320><c> cloud</c><00:21:00.559><c> code</c>

00:21:00.789 --> 00:21:00.799 align:start position:0%
positive. We had an awesome cloud code
 

00:21:00.799 --> 00:21:03.830 align:start position:0%
positive. We had an awesome cloud code
for<00:21:00.960><c> product</c><00:21:01.280><c> managers</c><00:21:02.240><c> episode.</c><00:21:02.799><c> 80%</c>

00:21:03.830 --> 00:21:03.840 align:start position:0%
for product managers episode. 80%
 

00:21:03.840 --> 00:21:05.909 align:start position:0%
for product managers episode. 80%
positive<00:21:04.880><c> comments.</c><00:21:05.360><c> And</c><00:21:05.440><c> then</c><00:21:05.600><c> we</c><00:21:05.760><c> can</c>

00:21:05.909 --> 00:21:05.919 align:start position:0%
positive comments. And then we can
 

00:21:05.919 --> 00:21:08.070 align:start position:0%
positive comments. And then we can
actually<00:21:06.240><c> go</c><00:21:06.640><c> through</c><00:21:07.200><c> the</c><00:21:07.600><c> comments</c>

00:21:08.070 --> 00:21:08.080 align:start position:0%
actually go through the comments
 

00:21:08.080 --> 00:21:13.510 align:start position:0%
actually go through the comments
themselves.<00:21:09.360><c> And</c><00:21:10.480><c> I</c><00:21:11.120><c> using</c><00:21:11.600><c> Jev</c><00:21:12.400><c> built</c><00:21:13.039><c> live</c>

00:21:13.510 --> 00:21:13.520 align:start position:0%
themselves. And I using Jev built live
 

00:21:13.520 --> 00:21:16.149 align:start position:0%
themselves. And I using Jev built live
search<00:21:14.000><c> against</c><00:21:14.320><c> these</c><00:21:14.640><c> comments.</c><00:21:15.280><c> So,</c><00:21:15.600><c> if</c><00:21:15.840><c> I</c>

00:21:16.149 --> 00:21:16.159 align:start position:0%
search against these comments. So, if I
 

00:21:16.159 --> 00:21:19.430 align:start position:0%
search against these comments. So, if I
wanted<00:21:16.400><c> to</c><00:21:16.640><c> find</c><00:21:18.000><c> comments</c><00:21:18.559><c> about</c><00:21:19.120><c> screen</c>

00:21:19.430 --> 00:21:19.440 align:start position:0%
wanted to find comments about screen
 

00:21:19.440 --> 00:21:23.430 align:start position:0%
wanted to find comments about screen
share,<00:21:20.720><c> it</c><00:21:21.039><c> would</c><00:21:21.919><c> search</c><00:21:22.320><c> and</c><00:21:22.640><c> find</c><00:21:23.039><c> very</c>

00:21:23.430 --> 00:21:23.440 align:start position:0%
share, it would search and find very
 

00:21:23.440 --> 00:21:25.510 align:start position:0%
share, it would search and find very
quickly<00:21:24.240><c> something</c><00:21:24.480><c> that</c><00:21:24.799><c> says</c><00:21:25.200><c> screen</c>

00:21:25.510 --> 00:21:25.520 align:start position:0%
quickly something that says screen
 

00:21:25.520 --> 00:21:28.149 align:start position:0%
quickly something that says screen
share.<00:21:25.919><c> If</c><00:21:26.080><c> I</c><00:21:26.240><c> wanted</c><00:21:26.480><c> to</c><00:21:26.720><c> say,</c><00:21:27.600><c> "What</c><00:21:27.919><c> are</c><00:21:28.000><c> the</c>

00:21:28.149 --> 00:21:28.159 align:start position:0%
share. If I wanted to say, "What are the
 

00:21:28.159 --> 00:21:30.149 align:start position:0%
share. If I wanted to say, "What are the
comments<00:21:28.400><c> about</c><00:21:28.640><c> slop?"</c><00:21:29.200><c> I</c><00:21:29.440><c> could</c><00:21:29.520><c> do</c><00:21:29.679><c> slop</c>

00:21:30.149 --> 00:21:30.159 align:start position:0%
comments about slop?" I could do slop
 

00:21:30.159 --> 00:21:33.029 align:start position:0%
comments about slop?" I could do slop
and<00:21:30.320><c> then</c><00:21:30.480><c> very</c><00:21:30.799><c> quickly</c><00:21:31.679><c> it</c><00:21:31.919><c> scanned</c><00:21:32.400><c> all</c>

00:21:33.029 --> 00:21:33.039 align:start position:0%
and then very quickly it scanned all
 

00:21:33.039 --> 00:21:37.510 align:start position:0%
and then very quickly it scanned all
4,400<00:21:34.320><c> and</c><00:21:35.679><c> found</c><00:21:36.000><c> all</c><00:21:36.240><c> the</c><00:21:36.400><c> comments</c><00:21:37.200><c> that</c>

00:21:37.510 --> 00:21:37.520 align:start position:0%
4,400 and found all the comments that
 

00:21:37.520 --> 00:21:41.190 align:start position:0%
4,400 and found all the comments that
are<00:21:38.000><c> related</c><00:21:38.640><c> to</c><00:21:39.280><c> slop.</c><00:21:39.760><c> So,</c><00:21:40.000><c> again,</c><00:21:40.799><c> this</c><00:21:40.960><c> is</c>

00:21:41.190 --> 00:21:41.200 align:start position:0%
are related to slop. So, again, this is
 

00:21:41.200 --> 00:21:43.669 align:start position:0%
are related to slop. So, again, this is
very<00:21:41.520><c> performant,</c><00:21:42.240><c> very</c><00:21:42.720><c> fast.</c><00:21:43.280><c> just</c><00:21:43.520><c> for</c>

00:21:43.669 --> 00:21:43.679 align:start position:0%
very performant, very fast. just for
 

00:21:43.679 --> 00:21:45.350 align:start position:0%
very performant, very fast. just for
like<00:21:43.919><c> behind</c><00:21:44.080><c> the</c><00:21:44.320><c> scenes,</c><00:21:44.559><c> you</c><00:21:44.799><c> have</c><00:21:44.880><c> to</c><00:21:45.039><c> like</c>

00:21:45.350 --> 00:21:45.360 align:start position:0%
like behind the scenes, you have to like
 

00:21:45.360 --> 00:21:47.270 align:start position:0%
like behind the scenes, you have to like
batch<00:21:45.760><c> the</c><00:21:46.000><c> results</c><00:21:46.240><c> and</c><00:21:46.480><c> then</c><00:21:46.799><c> score</c><00:21:47.039><c> them</c>

00:21:47.270 --> 00:21:47.280 align:start position:0%
batch the results and then score them
 

00:21:47.280 --> 00:21:49.430 align:start position:0%
batch the results and then score them
and<00:21:47.520><c> then</c><00:21:47.679><c> push</c><00:21:48.000><c> the</c><00:21:48.159><c> high</c><00:21:48.480><c> scores</c><00:21:48.799><c> up</c><00:21:49.039><c> to</c><00:21:49.360><c> get</c>

00:21:49.430 --> 00:21:49.440 align:start position:0%
and then push the high scores up to get
 

00:21:49.440 --> 00:21:51.430 align:start position:0%
and then push the high scores up to get
that<00:21:49.679><c> kind</c><00:21:49.840><c> of</c><00:21:50.000><c> performance.</c><00:21:50.880><c> So,</c><00:21:51.039><c> there</c><00:21:51.280><c> is</c>

00:21:51.430 --> 00:21:51.440 align:start position:0%
that kind of performance. So, there is
 

00:21:51.440 --> 00:21:53.029 align:start position:0%
that kind of performance. So, there is
some<00:21:51.600><c> architecture</c><00:21:52.080><c> here.</c><00:21:52.400><c> I</c><00:21:52.640><c> don't</c><00:21:52.799><c> want</c><00:21:52.880><c> to</c>

00:21:53.029 --> 00:21:53.039 align:start position:0%
some architecture here. I don't want to
 

00:21:53.039 --> 00:21:54.870 align:start position:0%
some architecture here. I don't want to
pretend<00:21:53.280><c> like</c><00:21:53.520><c> Jev</c><00:21:53.919><c> you</c><00:21:54.080><c> just</c><00:21:54.159><c> like</c><00:21:54.320><c> slap</c><00:21:54.640><c> Jev</c>

00:21:54.870 --> 00:21:54.880 align:start position:0%
pretend like Jev you just like slap Jev
 

00:21:54.880 --> 00:21:57.110 align:start position:0%
pretend like Jev you just like slap Jev
in<00:21:55.039><c> the</c><00:21:55.120><c> middle</c><00:21:55.200><c> and</c><00:21:55.440><c> evaluate</c><00:21:56.000><c> all</c><00:21:56.240><c> 4,400</c>

00:21:57.110 --> 00:21:57.120 align:start position:0%
in the middle and evaluate all 4,400
 

00:21:57.120 --> 00:21:59.830 align:start position:0%
in the middle and evaluate all 4,400
that<00:21:57.440><c> quickly,</c><00:21:58.400><c> but</c><00:21:58.720><c> you</c><00:21:58.960><c> can</c><00:21:59.039><c> imagine</c><00:21:59.600><c> this</c>

00:21:59.830 --> 00:21:59.840 align:start position:0%
that quickly, but you can imagine this
 

00:21:59.840 --> 00:22:03.590 align:start position:0%
that quickly, but you can imagine this
is<00:22:00.400><c> very</c><00:22:01.760><c> useful.</c><00:22:02.480><c> And</c><00:22:02.720><c> so,</c><00:22:02.960><c> one,</c><00:22:03.280><c> thanks</c><00:22:03.440><c> for</c>

00:22:03.590 --> 00:22:03.600 align:start position:0%
is very useful. And so, one, thanks for
 

00:22:03.600 --> 00:22:05.590 align:start position:0%
is very useful. And so, one, thanks for
all<00:22:03.679><c> the</c><00:22:03.840><c> comments.</c><00:22:04.159><c> And</c><00:22:04.400><c> two,</c><00:22:05.200><c> this</c><00:22:05.440><c> was</c>

00:22:05.590 --> 00:22:05.600 align:start position:0%
all the comments. And two, this was
 

00:22:05.600 --> 00:22:07.110 align:start position:0%
all the comments. And two, this was
really,<00:22:06.000><c> really</c><00:22:06.240><c> cool</c><00:22:06.400><c> to</c><00:22:06.559><c> build.</c><00:22:06.799><c> And</c><00:22:06.960><c> then</c>

00:22:07.110 --> 00:22:07.120 align:start position:0%
really, really cool to build. And then
 

00:22:07.120 --> 00:22:09.350 align:start position:0%
really, really cool to build. And then
finally,<00:22:07.440><c> I</c><00:22:07.679><c> have</c><00:22:07.760><c> to</c><00:22:07.919><c> give</c><00:22:08.159><c> Astra</c><00:22:08.799><c> props.</c>

00:22:09.350 --> 00:22:09.360 align:start position:0%
finally, I have to give Astra props.
 

00:22:09.360 --> 00:22:11.750 align:start position:0%
finally, I have to give Astra props.
Really<00:22:09.600><c> nailed</c><00:22:09.840><c> the</c><00:22:10.000><c> Howa</c><00:22:10.320><c> AI</c><00:22:11.200><c> podcast</c>

00:22:11.750 --> 00:22:11.760 align:start position:0%
Really nailed the Howa AI podcast
 

00:22:11.760 --> 00:22:14.149 align:start position:0%
Really nailed the Howa AI podcast
styling.<00:22:12.400><c> So,</c><00:22:12.720><c> good</c><00:22:12.960><c> job</c><00:22:13.120><c> on</c><00:22:13.360><c> the</c><00:22:13.520><c> front</c><00:22:13.679><c> end,</c>

00:22:14.149 --> 00:22:14.159 align:start position:0%
styling. So, good job on the front end,
 

00:22:14.159 --> 00:22:16.470 align:start position:0%
styling. So, good job on the front end,
but<00:22:14.320><c> I</c><00:22:14.480><c> want</c><00:22:14.559><c> to</c><00:22:14.640><c> show</c><00:22:14.880><c> one</c><00:22:15.120><c> last</c><00:22:15.360><c> one</c><00:22:15.600><c> before</c><00:22:16.080><c> I</c>

00:22:16.470 --> 00:22:16.480 align:start position:0%
but I want to show one last one before I
 

00:22:16.480 --> 00:22:18.789 align:start position:0%
but I want to show one last one before I
get<00:22:16.720><c> us</c><00:22:16.880><c> out</c><00:22:17.039><c> of</c><00:22:17.200><c> here.</c><00:22:17.520><c> And</c><00:22:17.679><c> then</c><00:22:18.159><c> I</c><00:22:18.400><c> said</c><00:22:18.640><c> this</c>

00:22:18.789 --> 00:22:18.799 align:start position:0%
get us out of here. And then I said this
 

00:22:18.799 --> 00:22:21.909 align:start position:0%
get us out of here. And then I said this
was<00:22:18.960><c> Jev</c><00:22:19.280><c> week.</c><00:22:19.600><c> So,</c><00:22:20.320><c> like</c><00:22:20.559><c> and</c><00:22:20.880><c> subscribe</c><00:22:21.520><c> for</c>

00:22:21.909 --> 00:22:21.919 align:start position:0%
was Jev week. So, like and subscribe for
 

00:22:21.919 --> 00:22:24.470 align:start position:0%
was Jev week. So, like and subscribe for
a<00:22:22.240><c> second</c><00:22:22.640><c> follow-up</c><00:22:23.280><c> Jev</c><00:22:23.760><c> episode</c><00:22:24.080><c> with</c><00:22:24.320><c> one</c>

00:22:24.470 --> 00:22:24.480 align:start position:0%
a second follow-up Jev episode with one
 

00:22:24.480 --> 00:22:25.990 align:start position:0%
a second follow-up Jev episode with one
of<00:22:24.559><c> our</c><00:22:24.640><c> How</c><00:22:25.039><c> Ia</c><00:22:25.360><c> guests</c><00:22:25.679><c> that's</c><00:22:25.840><c> going</c><00:22:25.919><c> to</c>

00:22:25.990 --> 00:22:26.000 align:start position:0%
of our How Ia guests that's going to
 

00:22:26.000 --> 00:22:27.830 align:start position:0%
of our How Ia guests that's going to
come<00:22:26.240><c> later</c><00:22:26.480><c> this</c><00:22:26.720><c> week.</c><00:22:27.280><c> But</c><00:22:27.440><c> I</c><00:22:27.600><c> wanted</c><00:22:27.679><c> to</c>

00:22:27.830 --> 00:22:27.840 align:start position:0%
come later this week. But I wanted to
 

00:22:27.840 --> 00:22:30.870 align:start position:0%
come later this week. But I wanted to
show<00:22:28.000><c> like</c><00:22:28.240><c> kind</c><00:22:28.400><c> of</c><00:22:28.400><c> a</c><00:22:28.640><c> fun</c><00:22:29.120><c> realtime</c>

00:22:30.870 --> 00:22:30.880 align:start position:0%
show like kind of a fun realtime
 

00:22:30.880 --> 00:22:34.470 align:start position:0%
show like kind of a fun realtime
use<00:22:31.120><c> case</c><00:22:31.520><c> for</c><00:22:32.000><c> Jev.</c><00:22:32.559><c> So</c><00:22:32.799><c> if</c><00:22:33.039><c> you</c><00:22:33.360><c> have</c><00:22:33.600><c> been</c>

00:22:34.470 --> 00:22:34.480 align:start position:0%
use case for Jev. So if you have been
 

00:22:34.480 --> 00:22:36.710 align:start position:0%
use case for Jev. So if you have been
seeing<00:22:34.799><c> any</c><00:22:35.039><c> of</c><00:22:35.120><c> these</c><00:22:35.360><c> like</c><00:22:35.600><c> real</c><00:22:35.919><c> time</c><00:22:36.320><c> app</c>

00:22:36.710 --> 00:22:36.720 align:start position:0%
seeing any of these like real time app
 

00:22:36.720 --> 00:22:39.350 align:start position:0%
seeing any of these like real time app
applications<00:22:37.520><c> of</c><00:22:37.760><c> Jev</c><00:22:38.240><c> like</c><00:22:38.640><c> playing</c><00:22:38.880><c> a</c><00:22:39.120><c> video</c>

00:22:39.350 --> 00:22:39.360 align:start position:0%
applications of Jev like playing a video
 

00:22:39.360 --> 00:22:42.470 align:start position:0%
applications of Jev like playing a video
game<00:22:40.080><c> or</c><00:22:40.400><c> you</c><00:22:40.559><c> know</c><00:22:40.720><c> playing</c><00:22:41.039><c> playing</c><00:22:41.440><c> Tetris</c>

00:22:42.470 --> 00:22:42.480 align:start position:0%
game or you know playing playing Tetris
 

00:22:42.480 --> 00:22:44.230 align:start position:0%
game or you know playing playing Tetris
doing<00:22:42.799><c> live</c><00:22:43.120><c> search</c><00:22:43.520><c> all</c><00:22:43.679><c> these</c><00:22:43.919><c> things</c><00:22:44.080><c> you</c>

00:22:44.230 --> 00:22:44.240 align:start position:0%
doing live search all these things you
 

00:22:44.240 --> 00:22:46.549 align:start position:0%
doing live search all these things you
can<00:22:44.320><c> do</c><00:22:44.480><c> a</c><00:22:44.640><c> lot</c><00:22:44.720><c> of</c><00:22:44.880><c> real</c><00:22:45.120><c> time</c><00:22:45.440><c> stuff</c><00:22:46.240><c> where</c>

00:22:46.549 --> 00:22:46.559 align:start position:0%
can do a lot of real time stuff where
 

00:22:46.559 --> 00:22:48.310 align:start position:0%
can do a lot of real time stuff where
making<00:22:46.799><c> a</c><00:22:47.039><c> very</c><00:22:47.200><c> quick</c><00:22:47.520><c> decision</c><00:22:48.000><c> or</c>

00:22:48.310 --> 00:22:48.320 align:start position:0%
making a very quick decision or
 

00:22:48.320 --> 00:22:51.190 align:start position:0%
making a very quick decision or
returning<00:22:48.799><c> a</c><00:22:48.960><c> set</c><00:22:49.120><c> of</c><00:22:49.280><c> choices</c><00:22:50.559><c> can</c><00:22:50.799><c> be</c><00:22:50.960><c> very</c>

00:22:51.190 --> 00:22:51.200 align:start position:0%
returning a set of choices can be very
 

00:22:51.200 --> 00:22:54.149 align:start position:0%
returning a set of choices can be very
powerful.<00:22:51.840><c> Okay,</c><00:22:52.240><c> so</c><00:22:52.480><c> I</c><00:22:52.799><c> built</c><00:22:53.120><c> a</c><00:22:53.440><c> real</c><00:22:53.840><c> time</c>

00:22:54.149 --> 00:22:54.159 align:start position:0%
powerful. Okay, so I built a real time
 

00:22:54.159 --> 00:22:57.350 align:start position:0%
powerful. Okay, so I built a real time
app<00:22:54.480><c> that</c><00:22:54.799><c> takes</c><00:22:55.039><c> in</c><00:22:55.360><c> voice</c><00:22:56.320><c> and</c><00:22:56.640><c> then</c><00:22:56.880><c> uses</c>

00:22:57.350 --> 00:22:57.360 align:start position:0%
app that takes in voice and then uses
 

00:22:57.360 --> 00:23:01.190 align:start position:0%
app that takes in voice and then uses
Jev<00:22:57.760><c> to</c><00:22:58.000><c> determine</c><00:22:58.880><c> what</c><00:22:59.360><c> color</c><00:23:00.480><c> is</c><00:23:00.720><c> like</c><00:23:00.960><c> my</c>

00:23:01.190 --> 00:23:01.200 align:start position:0%
Jev to determine what color is like my
 

00:23:01.200 --> 00:23:04.710 align:start position:0%
Jev to determine what color is like my
emotion<00:23:02.080><c> and</c><00:23:02.400><c> then</c><00:23:02.640><c> returns</c><00:23:03.039><c> a</c><00:23:03.280><c> quote</c><00:23:04.000><c> in</c>

00:23:04.710 --> 00:23:04.720 align:start position:0%
emotion and then returns a quote in
 

00:23:04.720 --> 00:23:08.149 align:start position:0%
emotion and then returns a quote in
reflection<00:23:05.280><c> of</c><00:23:05.520><c> my</c><00:23:05.760><c> emotion.</c><00:23:06.799><c> It</c><00:23:07.120><c> uses</c>

00:23:08.149 --> 00:23:08.159 align:start position:0%
reflection of my emotion. It uses
 

00:23:08.159 --> 00:23:10.950 align:start position:0%
reflection of my emotion. It uses
OpenAI's<00:23:08.880><c> real</c><00:23:09.120><c> time</c><00:23:09.360><c> voice</c><00:23:09.760><c> API.</c><00:23:10.400><c> It</c><00:23:10.640><c> uses</c>

00:23:10.950 --> 00:23:10.960 align:start position:0%
OpenAI's real time voice API. It uses
 

00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:13.270 align:start position:0%
OpenAI's real time voice API. It uses
Jev<00:23:11.360><c> and</c><00:23:11.520><c> then</c><00:23:11.600><c> it</c><00:23:11.760><c> uses</c><00:23:12.080><c> like</c><00:23:12.400><c> API</c><00:23:12.880><c> ninja</c>

00:23:13.270 --> 00:23:13.280 align:start position:0%
Jev and then it uses like API ninja
 

00:23:13.280 --> 00:23:15.110 align:start position:0%
Jev and then it uses like API ninja
quote<00:23:13.679><c> API.</c><00:23:14.080><c> There's</c><00:23:14.320><c> apparently</c><00:23:14.559><c> an</c><00:23:14.720><c> API</c><00:23:15.039><c> for</c>

00:23:15.110 --> 00:23:15.120 align:start position:0%
quote API. There's apparently an API for
 

00:23:15.120 --> 00:23:17.190 align:start position:0%
quote API. There's apparently an API for
quotes.<00:23:15.760><c> And</c><00:23:15.919><c> so</c><00:23:16.159><c> we're</c><00:23:16.320><c> going</c><00:23:16.400><c> to</c><00:23:16.640><c> see</c><00:23:16.960><c> if</c>

00:23:17.190 --> 00:23:17.200 align:start position:0%
quotes. And so we're going to see if
 

00:23:17.200 --> 00:23:19.909 align:start position:0%
quotes. And so we're going to see if
this<00:23:17.440><c> works</c><00:23:17.760><c> and</c><00:23:18.159><c> how</c><00:23:18.480><c> fast</c><00:23:18.720><c> it</c><00:23:18.960><c> is.</c><00:23:19.520><c> I'm</c>

00:23:19.909 --> 00:23:19.919 align:start position:0%
this works and how fast it is. I'm
 

00:23:19.919 --> 00:23:28.149 align:start position:0%
this works and how fast it is. I'm
feeling<00:23:20.320><c> so</c><00:23:20.720><c> tired</c><00:23:21.200><c> today.</c>

00:23:28.149 --> 00:23:28.159 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:23:28.159 --> 00:23:32.789 align:start position:0%
 
I'm<00:23:28.480><c> feeling</c><00:23:28.720><c> very</c><00:23:28.960><c> happy</c><00:23:29.280><c> today.</c>

00:23:32.789 --> 00:23:32.799 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:23:32.799 --> 00:23:36.310 align:start position:0%
 
Okay,<00:23:33.039><c> the</c><00:23:33.280><c> quotes.</c><00:23:33.679><c> Oh,</c><00:23:34.000><c> there</c><00:23:34.159><c> we</c>

00:23:36.310 --> 00:23:36.320 align:start position:0%
Okay, the quotes. Oh, there we
 

00:23:36.320 --> 00:23:39.669 align:start position:0%
Okay, the quotes. Oh, there we
see<00:23:36.640><c> the</c><00:23:36.799><c> quote</c><00:23:37.120><c> worked.</c><00:23:37.760><c> Okay,</c><00:23:38.000><c> hold</c><00:23:38.240><c> on.</c><00:23:39.440><c> Oh,</c>

00:23:39.669 --> 00:23:39.679 align:start position:0%
see the quote worked. Okay, hold on. Oh,
 

00:23:39.679 --> 00:23:45.510 align:start position:0%
see the quote worked. Okay, hold on. Oh,
it's<00:23:39.919><c> excited.</c>

00:23:45.510 --> 00:23:45.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:23:45.520 --> 00:23:54.310 align:start position:0%
 
I'm<00:23:46.000><c> in</c><00:23:46.400><c> love</c><00:23:47.760><c> today.</c>

00:23:54.310 --> 00:23:54.320 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:23:54.320 --> 00:24:01.990 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:23:54.799><c> can't</c><00:23:55.200><c> wait</c><00:23:55.679><c> for</c><00:23:56.000><c> the</c><00:23:56.159><c> weekend.</c>

00:24:01.990 --> 00:24:02.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:24:02.000 --> 00:24:08.310 align:start position:0%
 
Doing<00:24:02.320><c> this</c><00:24:02.640><c> podcast</c><00:24:03.360><c> is</c><00:24:04.000><c> the</c><00:24:04.320><c> best</c><00:24:04.799><c> job</c><00:24:05.200><c> ever.</c>

00:24:08.310 --> 00:24:08.320 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:24:08.320 --> 00:24:10.149 align:start position:0%
 
Look<00:24:08.480><c> at</c><00:24:08.640><c> that.</c><00:24:08.880><c> So,</c><00:24:09.120><c> we</c><00:24:09.280><c> got</c><00:24:09.520><c> all</c><00:24:09.679><c> these</c><00:24:10.000><c> Okay,</c>

00:24:10.149 --> 00:24:10.159 align:start position:0%
Look at that. So, we got all these Okay,
 

00:24:10.159 --> 00:24:11.269 align:start position:0%
Look at that. So, we got all these Okay,
I'm<00:24:10.320><c> going</c><00:24:10.400><c> to</c><00:24:10.480><c> turn</c><00:24:10.640><c> it</c><00:24:10.799><c> off</c><00:24:10.880><c> because</c><00:24:11.120><c> it's</c>

00:24:11.269 --> 00:24:11.279 align:start position:0%
I'm going to turn it off because it's
 

00:24:11.279 --> 00:24:13.190 align:start position:0%
I'm going to turn it off because it's
going<00:24:11.360><c> to</c><00:24:11.520><c> like</c><00:24:11.679><c> keep</c><00:24:11.919><c> listening</c><00:24:12.159><c> to</c><00:24:12.320><c> me.</c><00:24:13.039><c> Look</c>

00:24:13.190 --> 00:24:13.200 align:start position:0%
going to like keep listening to me. Look
 

00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:14.630 align:start position:0%
going to like keep listening to me. Look
at<00:24:13.360><c> all</c><00:24:13.520><c> these</c><00:24:13.840><c> quotes</c><00:24:14.159><c> where</c><00:24:14.480><c> like</c>

00:24:14.630 --> 00:24:14.640 align:start position:0%
at all these quotes where like
 

00:24:14.640 --> 00:24:16.230 align:start position:0%
at all these quotes where like
immediately<00:24:15.120><c> it</c><00:24:15.360><c> picked</c><00:24:15.600><c> the</c><00:24:15.760><c> right</c><00:24:15.919><c> color.</c>

00:24:16.230 --> 00:24:16.240 align:start position:0%
immediately it picked the right color.
 

00:24:16.240 --> 00:24:17.909 align:start position:0%
immediately it picked the right color.
It<00:24:16.400><c> picked</c><00:24:16.640><c> the</c><00:24:16.799><c> right</c><00:24:16.960><c> quote.</c><00:24:17.520><c> You</c><00:24:17.760><c> can</c><00:24:17.840><c> tell</c>

00:24:17.909 --> 00:24:17.919 align:start position:0%
It picked the right quote. You can tell
 

00:24:17.919 --> 00:24:19.830 align:start position:0%
It picked the right quote. You can tell
the<00:24:18.080><c> quote</c><00:24:18.400><c> API</c><00:24:18.799><c> has</c><00:24:18.960><c> a</c><00:24:19.120><c> little</c><00:24:19.279><c> latency</c><00:24:19.679><c> in</c>

00:24:19.830 --> 00:24:19.840 align:start position:0%
the quote API has a little latency in
 

00:24:19.840 --> 00:24:23.269 align:start position:0%
the quote API has a little latency in
it,<00:24:20.159><c> but</c><00:24:21.360><c> you</c><00:24:21.600><c> can</c><00:24:21.760><c> imagine</c><00:24:22.159><c> how</c><00:24:22.400><c> fun</c><00:24:22.799><c> it</c><00:24:23.120><c> would</c>

00:24:23.269 --> 00:24:23.279 align:start position:0%
it, but you can imagine how fun it would
 

00:24:23.279 --> 00:24:25.990 align:start position:0%
it, but you can imagine how fun it would
be<00:24:23.760><c> to</c><00:24:24.080><c> be</c><00:24:24.240><c> able</c><00:24:24.400><c> to</c><00:24:24.640><c> build</c><00:24:24.880><c> these</c><00:24:25.200><c> real</c><00:24:25.520><c> time</c>

00:24:25.990 --> 00:24:26.000 align:start position:0%
be to be able to build these real time
 

00:24:26.000 --> 00:24:28.070 align:start position:0%
be to be able to build these real time
experiences.<00:24:26.799><c> And</c><00:24:26.960><c> again,</c><00:24:27.279><c> when</c><00:24:27.440><c> it's</c><00:24:27.679><c> like</c>

00:24:28.070 --> 00:24:28.080 align:start position:0%
experiences. And again, when it's like
 

00:24:28.080 --> 00:24:29.669 align:start position:0%
experiences. And again, when it's like
pick<00:24:28.400><c> the</c><00:24:28.559><c> right</c><00:24:28.720><c> color</c><00:24:28.960><c> to</c><00:24:29.200><c> match</c><00:24:29.440><c> the</c>

00:24:29.669 --> 00:24:29.679 align:start position:0%
pick the right color to match the
 

00:24:29.679 --> 00:24:31.990 align:start position:0%
pick the right color to match the
sentence,<00:24:30.559><c> it</c><00:24:30.880><c> can</c><00:24:31.039><c> do</c><00:24:31.200><c> that</c><00:24:31.360><c> really</c><00:24:31.679><c> well.</c>

00:24:31.990 --> 00:24:32.000 align:start position:0%
sentence, it can do that really well.
 

00:24:32.000 --> 00:24:33.669 align:start position:0%
sentence, it can do that really well.
Just<00:24:32.240><c> for</c><00:24:32.400><c> you</c><00:24:32.559><c> all</c><00:24:32.720><c> to</c><00:24:32.960><c> know</c><00:24:33.120><c> kind</c><00:24:33.279><c> of</c><00:24:33.360><c> how</c><00:24:33.520><c> it</c>

00:24:33.669 --> 00:24:33.679 align:start position:0%
Just for you all to know kind of how it
 

00:24:33.679 --> 00:24:36.390 align:start position:0%
Just for you all to know kind of how it
works,<00:24:34.240><c> I</c><00:24:34.480><c> gave</c><00:24:34.640><c> it</c><00:24:34.799><c> a</c><00:24:35.039><c> list</c><00:24:35.200><c> of</c><00:24:35.520><c> hex</c><00:24:35.919><c> values.</c>

00:24:36.390 --> 00:24:36.400 align:start position:0%
works, I gave it a list of hex values.
 

00:24:36.400 --> 00:24:39.029 align:start position:0%
works, I gave it a list of hex values.
So,<00:24:36.559><c> a</c><00:24:36.720><c> list</c><00:24:36.880><c> of</c><00:24:37.120><c> colors.</c><00:24:37.840><c> Every</c><00:24:38.240><c> sentence</c><00:24:38.720><c> or</c>

00:24:39.029 --> 00:24:39.039 align:start position:0%
So, a list of colors. Every sentence or
 

00:24:39.039 --> 00:24:40.549 align:start position:0%
So, a list of colors. Every sentence or
like<00:24:39.279><c> phrase</c><00:24:39.760><c> it</c><00:24:40.000><c> ingests</c><00:24:40.320><c> from</c><00:24:40.480><c> the</c>

00:24:40.549 --> 00:24:40.559 align:start position:0%
like phrase it ingests from the
 

00:24:40.559 --> 00:24:43.510 align:start position:0%
like phrase it ingests from the
real-time<00:24:40.960><c> API,</c><00:24:41.760><c> it</c><00:24:42.000><c> asks</c><00:24:42.240><c> what</c><00:24:42.480><c> color</c><00:24:43.120><c> or</c><00:24:43.360><c> it</c>

00:24:43.510 --> 00:24:43.520 align:start position:0%
real-time API, it asks what color or it
 

00:24:43.520 --> 00:24:45.029 align:start position:0%
real-time API, it asks what color or it
scores<00:24:43.840><c> the</c><00:24:44.000><c> colors.</c><00:24:44.400><c> It</c><00:24:44.559><c> gives</c><00:24:44.720><c> the</c><00:24:44.880><c> top</c>

00:24:45.029 --> 00:24:45.039 align:start position:0%
scores the colors. It gives the top
 

00:24:45.039 --> 00:24:47.510 align:start position:0%
scores the colors. It gives the top
ranking<00:24:45.360><c> score</c><00:24:45.679><c> color</c><00:24:46.000><c> and</c><00:24:46.320><c> then</c><00:24:46.880><c> it</c><00:24:47.200><c> also</c>

00:24:47.510 --> 00:24:47.520 align:start position:0%
ranking score color and then it also
 

00:24:47.520 --> 00:24:50.149 align:start position:0%
ranking score color and then it also
picks<00:24:47.840><c> from</c><00:24:48.159><c> a</c><00:24:48.400><c> set</c><00:24:48.640><c> list</c><00:24:48.880><c> of</c><00:24:49.200><c> filters</c><00:24:49.760><c> for</c><00:24:50.000><c> the</c>

00:24:50.149 --> 00:24:50.159 align:start position:0%
picks from a set list of filters for the
 

00:24:50.159 --> 00:24:53.029 align:start position:0%
picks from a set list of filters for the
quote<00:24:50.480><c> API.</c><00:24:51.039><c> So</c><00:24:51.200><c> it</c><00:24:51.440><c> filters</c><00:24:51.919><c> the</c><00:24:52.159><c> quotes</c><00:24:52.799><c> and</c>

00:24:53.029 --> 00:24:53.039 align:start position:0%
quote API. So it filters the quotes and
 

00:24:53.039 --> 00:24:56.870 align:start position:0%
quote API. So it filters the quotes and
then<00:24:53.200><c> it</c><00:24:53.520><c> scores</c><00:24:54.000><c> them</c><00:24:54.400><c> against</c><00:24:55.039><c> my</c><00:24:55.919><c> sentiment</c>

00:24:56.870 --> 00:24:56.880 align:start position:0%
then it scores them against my sentiment
 

00:24:56.880 --> 00:24:58.630 align:start position:0%
then it scores them against my sentiment
and<00:24:57.120><c> then</c><00:24:57.279><c> it</c><00:24:57.440><c> shows</c><00:24:57.679><c> it</c><00:24:57.840><c> on</c><00:24:58.000><c> the</c><00:24:58.159><c> screen.</c><00:24:58.480><c> So</c>

00:24:58.630 --> 00:24:58.640 align:start position:0%
and then it shows it on the screen. So
 

00:24:58.640 --> 00:25:01.430 align:start position:0%
and then it shows it on the screen. So
again<00:24:58.960><c> like</c><00:24:59.679><c> running</c><00:25:00.080><c> locally</c><00:25:00.960><c> not</c><00:25:01.200><c> the</c>

00:25:01.430 --> 00:25:01.440 align:start position:0%
again like running locally not the
 

00:25:01.440 --> 00:25:03.510 align:start position:0%
again like running locally not the
fastest.<00:25:01.840><c> I'm</c><00:25:02.080><c> sure</c><00:25:02.320><c> I</c><00:25:02.480><c> could</c><00:25:02.640><c> optimize</c><00:25:03.039><c> it</c><00:25:03.279><c> by</c>

00:25:03.510 --> 00:25:03.520 align:start position:0%
fastest. I'm sure I could optimize it by
 

00:25:03.520 --> 00:25:05.590 align:start position:0%
fastest. I'm sure I could optimize it by
caching<00:25:03.919><c> a</c><00:25:04.080><c> bunch</c><00:25:04.240><c> of</c><00:25:04.320><c> this</c><00:25:04.559><c> stuff</c><00:25:04.880><c> and</c><00:25:05.360><c> you</c>

00:25:05.590 --> 00:25:05.600 align:start position:0%
caching a bunch of this stuff and you
 

00:25:05.600 --> 00:25:07.830 align:start position:0%
caching a bunch of this stuff and you
know<00:25:06.000><c> doing</c><00:25:06.240><c> all</c><00:25:06.480><c> sorts</c><00:25:06.640><c> of</c><00:25:06.799><c> things</c><00:25:07.279><c> but</c><00:25:07.520><c> again</c>

00:25:07.830 --> 00:25:07.840 align:start position:0%
know doing all sorts of things but again
 

00:25:07.840 --> 00:25:10.950 align:start position:0%
know doing all sorts of things but again
like<00:25:08.000><c> a</c><00:25:08.240><c> little</c><00:25:08.480><c> like</c><00:25:08.880><c> magic</c><00:25:09.679><c> use</c><00:25:09.919><c> case</c><00:25:10.400><c> that</c><00:25:10.720><c> I</c>

00:25:10.950 --> 00:25:10.960 align:start position:0%
like a little like magic use case that I
 

00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:13.909 align:start position:0%
like a little like magic use case that I
think<00:25:11.200><c> is</c><00:25:12.240><c> really</c><00:25:12.559><c> indicative</c><00:25:13.120><c> of</c><00:25:13.360><c> the</c><00:25:13.600><c> kinds</c>

00:25:13.909 --> 00:25:13.919 align:start position:0%
think is really indicative of the kinds
 

00:25:13.919 --> 00:25:18.310 align:start position:0%
think is really indicative of the kinds
of<00:25:14.240><c> things</c><00:25:14.640><c> you</c><00:25:15.039><c> can</c><00:25:15.279><c> build</c><00:25:15.679><c> with</c><00:25:16.159><c> Jeb.</c><00:25:17.440><c> So</c>

00:25:18.310 --> 00:25:18.320 align:start position:0%
of things you can build with Jeb. So
 

00:25:18.320 --> 00:25:21.669 align:start position:0%
of things you can build with Jeb. So
that<00:25:18.640><c> is</c><00:25:18.880><c> my</c><00:25:19.440><c> Jev</c><00:25:19.919><c> 101.</c><00:25:20.799><c> How</c><00:25:20.960><c> to</c><00:25:21.120><c> use</c><00:25:21.279><c> it</c><00:25:21.440><c> on</c>

00:25:21.669 --> 00:25:21.679 align:start position:0%
that is my Jev 101. How to use it on
 

00:25:21.679 --> 00:25:24.149 align:start position:0%
that is my Jev 101. How to use it on
your<00:25:21.840><c> own</c><00:25:22.000><c> data</c><00:25:22.880><c> how</c><00:25:23.120><c> to</c><00:25:23.200><c> use</c><00:25:23.360><c> it</c><00:25:23.520><c> with</c><00:25:23.840><c> other</c>

00:25:24.149 --> 00:25:24.159 align:start position:0%
your own data how to use it with other
 

00:25:24.159 --> 00:25:26.789 align:start position:0%
your own data how to use it with other
models<00:25:24.640><c> and</c><00:25:24.880><c> how</c><00:25:25.039><c> to</c><00:25:25.200><c> build</c><00:25:25.520><c> some</c><00:25:25.840><c> fun</c>

00:25:26.789 --> 00:25:26.799 align:start position:0%
models and how to build some fun
 

00:25:26.799 --> 00:25:30.070 align:start position:0%
models and how to build some fun
realtime<00:25:27.600><c> experiences</c><00:25:28.480><c> in</c><00:25:28.799><c> your</c><00:25:29.039><c> app</c><00:25:29.520><c> intro.</c>

00:25:30.070 --> 00:25:30.080 align:start position:0%
realtime experiences in your app intro.
 

00:25:30.080 --> 00:25:33.669 align:start position:0%
realtime experiences in your app intro.
Again,<00:25:30.960><c> as</c><00:25:31.200><c> I</c><00:25:31.440><c> said,</c><00:25:31.919><c> this</c><00:25:32.080><c> is</c><00:25:32.240><c> Jev</c><00:25:32.720><c> episode</c>

00:25:33.669 --> 00:25:33.679 align:start position:0%
Again, as I said, this is Jev episode
 

00:25:33.679 --> 00:25:35.510 align:start position:0%
Again, as I said, this is Jev episode
number<00:25:34.159><c> one</c><00:25:34.480><c> this</c><00:25:34.799><c> week.</c><00:25:35.039><c> So,</c><00:25:35.200><c> we're</c><00:25:35.360><c> going</c><00:25:35.440><c> to</c>

00:25:35.510 --> 00:25:35.520 align:start position:0%
number one this week. So, we're going to
 

00:25:35.520 --> 00:25:38.630 align:start position:0%
number one this week. So, we're going to
have<00:25:35.679><c> another</c><00:25:36.080><c> one</c><00:25:36.960><c> midweek</c><00:25:37.840><c> with</c><00:25:38.080><c> one</c><00:25:38.320><c> of</c><00:25:38.400><c> our</c>

00:25:38.630 --> 00:25:38.640 align:start position:0%
have another one midweek with one of our
 

00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:40.710 align:start position:0%
have another one midweek with one of our
most<00:25:39.039><c> popular</c><00:25:39.520><c> guests.</c><00:25:40.000><c> So,</c><00:25:40.159><c> if</c><00:25:40.320><c> you</c><00:25:40.480><c> are</c>

00:25:40.710 --> 00:25:40.720 align:start position:0%
most popular guests. So, if you are
 

00:25:40.720 --> 00:25:43.669 align:start position:0%
most popular guests. So, if you are
excited<00:25:41.120><c> about</c><00:25:41.279><c> that</c><00:25:41.600><c> episode,</c><00:25:42.720><c> subscribe,</c>

00:25:43.669 --> 00:25:43.679 align:start position:0%
excited about that episode, subscribe,
 

00:25:43.679 --> 00:25:45.430 align:start position:0%
excited about that episode, subscribe,
comment,<00:25:44.240><c> let</c><00:25:44.400><c> me</c><00:25:44.559><c> know</c><00:25:44.640><c> what</c><00:25:44.799><c> you</c><00:25:44.960><c> want</c><00:25:45.120><c> us</c><00:25:45.279><c> to</c>

00:25:45.430 --> 00:25:45.440 align:start position:0%
comment, let me know what you want us to
 

00:25:45.440 --> 00:25:47.269 align:start position:0%
comment, let me know what you want us to
talk<00:25:45.600><c> about,</c><00:25:46.000><c> what</c><00:25:46.240><c> questions</c><00:25:46.559><c> I</c><00:25:46.799><c> can</c><00:25:46.960><c> answer</c>

00:25:47.269 --> 00:25:47.279 align:start position:0%
talk about, what questions I can answer
 

00:25:47.279 --> 00:25:49.990 align:start position:0%
talk about, what questions I can answer
about<00:25:47.600><c> Jeb.</c><00:25:48.240><c> And</c><00:25:48.480><c> until</c><00:25:48.799><c> then,</c><00:25:49.440><c> it</c><00:25:49.600><c> has</c><00:25:49.840><c> been</c>

00:25:49.990 --> 00:25:50.000 align:start position:0%
about Jeb. And until then, it has been
 

00:25:50.000 --> 00:25:52.230 align:start position:0%
about Jeb. And until then, it has been
so<00:25:50.320><c> nice</c><00:25:50.720><c> showing</c><00:25:51.039><c> you</c><00:25:51.360><c> my</c><00:25:51.679><c> favorite</c><00:25:52.000><c> new</c>

00:25:52.230 --> 00:25:52.240 align:start position:0%
so nice showing you my favorite new
 

00:25:52.240 --> 00:25:56.789 align:start position:0%
so nice showing you my favorite new
model.<00:25:53.200><c> Thanks</c><00:25:53.440><c> for</c><00:25:53.679><c> joining</c><00:25:54.159><c> How</c><00:25:54.480><c> I</c><00:25:54.640><c> AI.</c>

00:25:56.789 --> 00:25:56.799 align:start position:0%
model. Thanks for joining How I AI.
 

00:25:56.799 --> 00:25:58.630 align:start position:0%
model. Thanks for joining How I AI.
Thanks<00:25:57.039><c> so</c><00:25:57.200><c> much</c><00:25:57.360><c> for</c><00:25:57.600><c> watching.</c><00:25:58.080><c> If</c><00:25:58.400><c> you</c>

00:25:58.630 --> 00:25:58.640 align:start position:0%
Thanks so much for watching. If you
 

00:25:58.640 --> 00:26:00.390 align:start position:0%
Thanks so much for watching. If you
enjoyed<00:25:59.120><c> this</c><00:25:59.360><c> show,</c><00:25:59.760><c> please</c><00:26:00.000><c> like</c><00:26:00.159><c> and</c>

00:26:00.390 --> 00:26:00.400 align:start position:0%
enjoyed this show, please like and
 

00:26:00.400 --> 00:26:02.070 align:start position:0%
enjoyed this show, please like and
subscribe<00:26:00.720><c> here</c><00:26:00.960><c> on</c><00:26:01.120><c> YouTube,</c><00:26:01.600><c> or</c><00:26:01.840><c> even</c>

00:26:02.070 --> 00:26:02.080 align:start position:0%
subscribe here on YouTube, or even
 

00:26:02.080 --> 00:26:03.510 align:start position:0%
subscribe here on YouTube, or even
better,<00:26:02.400><c> leave</c><00:26:02.559><c> us</c><00:26:02.720><c> a</c><00:26:02.960><c> comment</c><00:26:03.120><c> with</c><00:26:03.360><c> your</c>

00:26:03.510 --> 00:26:03.520 align:start position:0%
better, leave us a comment with your
 

00:26:03.520 --> 00:26:05.909 align:start position:0%
better, leave us a comment with your
thoughts.<00:26:04.400><c> You</c><00:26:04.559><c> can</c><00:26:04.720><c> also</c><00:26:04.960><c> find</c><00:26:05.200><c> this</c><00:26:05.360><c> podcast</c>

00:26:05.909 --> 00:26:05.919 align:start position:0%
thoughts. You can also find this podcast
 

00:26:05.919 --> 00:26:08.870 align:start position:0%
thoughts. You can also find this podcast
on<00:26:06.240><c> Apple</c><00:26:06.559><c> Podcasts,</c><00:26:07.520><c> Spotify,</c><00:26:08.320><c> or</c><00:26:08.640><c> your</c>

00:26:08.870 --> 00:26:08.880 align:start position:0%
on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your
 

00:26:08.880 --> 00:26:11.190 align:start position:0%
on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your
favorite<00:26:09.200><c> podcast</c><00:26:09.760><c> app.</c><00:26:10.559><c> Please</c><00:26:10.799><c> consider</c>

00:26:11.190 --> 00:26:11.200 align:start position:0%
favorite podcast app. Please consider
 

00:26:11.200 --> 00:26:13.029 align:start position:0%
favorite podcast app. Please consider
leaving<00:26:11.520><c> us</c><00:26:11.679><c> a</c><00:26:11.840><c> rating</c><00:26:12.159><c> and</c><00:26:12.400><c> review,</c><00:26:12.799><c> which</c>

00:26:13.029 --> 00:26:13.039 align:start position:0%
leaving us a rating and review, which
 

00:26:13.039 --> 00:26:15.669 align:start position:0%
leaving us a rating and review, which
will<00:26:13.279><c> help</c><00:26:13.520><c> others</c><00:26:14.000><c> find</c><00:26:14.240><c> the</c><00:26:14.480><c> show.</c><00:26:15.279><c> You</c><00:26:15.520><c> can</c>

00:26:15.669 --> 00:26:15.679 align:start position:0%
will help others find the show. You can
 

00:26:15.679 --> 00:26:17.909 align:start position:0%
will help others find the show. You can
see<00:26:15.919><c> all</c><00:26:16.159><c> our</c><00:26:16.480><c> episodes</c><00:26:17.120><c> and</c><00:26:17.440><c> learn</c><00:26:17.760><c> more</c>

00:26:17.909 --> 00:26:17.919 align:start position:0%
see all our episodes and learn more
 

00:26:17.919 --> 00:26:21.590 align:start position:0%
see all our episodes and learn more
about<00:26:18.080><c> the</c><00:26:18.320><c> show</c><00:26:18.559><c> at</c><00:26:18.880><c> howiaipod.com.</c>

00:26:21.590 --> 00:26:21.600 align:start position:0%
about the show at howiaipod.com.
 

00:26:21.600 --> 00:26:25.159 align:start position:0%
about the show at howiaipod.com.
See<00:26:21.760><c> you</c><00:26:21.919><c> next</c><00:26:22.159><c> time.</c>

