WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.629 align:start position:0% So,<00:00:00.400> Deepseek<00:00:00.960> version<00:00:01.280> 4<00:00:01.520> Pro<00:00:01.760> is<00:00:02.080> officially 00:00:02.629 --> 00:00:02.639 align:start position:0% So, Deepseek version 4 Pro is officially 00:00:02.639 --> 00:00:04.789 align:start position:0% So, Deepseek version 4 Pro is officially out<00:00:02.879> today.<00:00:03.600> Now,<00:00:03.840> you<00:00:04.000> might<00:00:04.160> be<00:00:04.319> confused 00:00:04.789 --> 00:00:04.799 align:start position:0% out today. Now, you might be confused 00:00:04.799 --> 00:00:06.550 align:start position:0% out today. Now, you might be confused because<00:00:05.040> this<00:00:05.359> model<00:00:05.680> was<00:00:05.839> technically<00:00:06.319> out, 00:00:06.550 --> 00:00:06.560 align:start position:0% because this model was technically out, 00:00:06.560 --> 00:00:08.790 align:start position:0% because this model was technically out, but<00:00:06.720> it<00:00:06.879> was<00:00:06.960> in<00:00:07.200> general<00:00:07.600> availability,<00:00:08.480> but 00:00:08.790 --> 00:00:08.800 align:start position:0% but it was in general availability, but 00:00:08.800 --> 00:00:10.390 align:start position:0% but it was in general availability, but this<00:00:08.960> is<00:00:09.040> the<00:00:09.280> official<00:00:09.679> release,<00:00:10.160> meaning 00:00:10.390 --> 00:00:10.400 align:start position:0% this is the official release, meaning 00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:12.230 align:start position:0% this is the official release, meaning that<00:00:10.559> they<00:00:10.800> have<00:00:10.960> trained<00:00:11.280> the<00:00:11.440> model<00:00:12.000> a 00:00:12.230 --> 00:00:12.240 align:start position:0% that they have trained the model a 00:00:12.240 --> 00:00:14.230 align:start position:0% that they have trained the model a little<00:00:12.400> bit<00:00:12.559> more<00:00:12.719> and<00:00:13.120> produced<00:00:13.519> a<00:00:13.759> stronger 00:00:14.230 --> 00:00:14.240 align:start position:0% little bit more and produced a stronger 00:00:14.240 --> 00:00:15.990 align:start position:0% little bit more and produced a stronger version<00:00:14.480> of<00:00:14.639> the<00:00:14.799> model<00:00:15.040> that<00:00:15.360> is<00:00:15.599> available 00:00:15.990 --> 00:00:16.000 align:start position:0% version of the model that is available 00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:17.510 align:start position:0% version of the model that is available today.<00:00:16.480> Now,<00:00:16.640> if<00:00:16.800> I<00:00:16.960> were<00:00:17.039> to<00:00:17.199> summarize 00:00:17.510 --> 00:00:17.520 align:start position:0% today. Now, if I were to summarize 00:00:17.520 --> 00:00:19.510 align:start position:0% today. Now, if I were to summarize today's<00:00:17.920> release<00:00:18.160> in<00:00:18.480> one<00:00:18.640> simple<00:00:18.960> sentence, 00:00:19.510 --> 00:00:19.520 align:start position:0% today's release in one simple sentence, 00:00:19.520 --> 00:00:21.510 align:start position:0% today's release in one simple sentence, it<00:00:19.680> is<00:00:19.840> that<00:00:20.000> the<00:00:20.240> price<00:00:20.480> to<00:00:20.720> performance<00:00:21.199> is 00:00:21.510 --> 00:00:21.520 align:start position:0% it is that the price to performance is 00:00:21.520 --> 00:00:23.750 align:start position:0% it is that the price to performance is becoming<00:00:21.840> a<00:00:22.240> very,<00:00:22.560> very<00:00:22.880> important<00:00:23.359> thing 00:00:23.750 --> 00:00:23.760 align:start position:0% becoming a very, very important thing 00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:25.429 align:start position:0% becoming a very, very important thing because<00:00:24.000> not<00:00:24.240> only<00:00:24.400> do<00:00:24.560> we<00:00:24.720> have<00:00:24.800> a<00:00:24.960> new<00:00:25.119> model 00:00:25.429 --> 00:00:25.439 align:start position:0% because not only do we have a new model 00:00:25.439 --> 00:00:27.670 align:start position:0% because not only do we have a new model from<00:00:25.600> the<00:00:25.760> Deepseek<00:00:26.320> team,<00:00:26.720> the<00:00:26.880> SpaceX<00:00:27.439> team 00:00:27.670 --> 00:00:27.680 align:start position:0% from the Deepseek team, the SpaceX team 00:00:27.680 --> 00:00:30.230 align:start position:0% from the Deepseek team, the SpaceX team also<00:00:28.000> dropped<00:00:28.320> Grock<00:00:28.720> 4.6<00:00:29.279> six.<00:00:29.679> And<00:00:29.920> both<00:00:30.160> of 00:00:30.230 --> 00:00:30.240 align:start position:0% also dropped Grock 4.6 six. And both of 00:00:30.240 --> 00:00:31.990 align:start position:0% also dropped Grock 4.6 six. And both of these<00:00:30.480> models<00:00:30.800> are<00:00:31.039> competing<00:00:31.439> with<00:00:31.599> the<00:00:31.760> best 00:00:31.990 --> 00:00:32.000 align:start position:0% these models are competing with the best 00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:34.069 align:start position:0% these models are competing with the best Frontier<00:00:32.480> Labs<00:00:32.960> at<00:00:33.200> a<00:00:33.440> fraction<00:00:33.680> of<00:00:33.840> their 00:00:34.069 --> 00:00:34.079 align:start position:0% Frontier Labs at a fraction of their 00:00:34.079 --> 00:00:37.030 align:start position:0% Frontier Labs at a fraction of their cost.<00:00:34.880> Let's<00:00:35.120> start<00:00:35.200> with<00:00:35.360> Gro<00:00:35.840> 4.6.<00:00:36.640> And<00:00:36.880> one 00:00:37.030 --> 00:00:37.040 align:start position:0% cost. Let's start with Gro 4.6. And one 00:00:37.040 --> 00:00:38.790 align:start position:0% cost. Let's start with Gro 4.6. And one thing<00:00:37.120> I'm<00:00:37.280> going<00:00:37.360> to<00:00:37.520> say<00:00:37.760> is<00:00:38.000> that<00:00:38.559> I'm 00:00:38.790 --> 00:00:38.800 align:start position:0% thing I'm going to say is that I'm 00:00:38.800 --> 00:00:40.869 align:start position:0% thing I'm going to say is that I'm genuinely<00:00:39.280> surprised<00:00:39.600> by<00:00:39.760> the<00:00:40.000> SpaceX<00:00:40.480> team. 00:00:40.869 --> 00:00:40.879 align:start position:0% genuinely surprised by the SpaceX team. 00:00:40.879 --> 00:00:42.470 align:start position:0% genuinely surprised by the SpaceX team. I'm<00:00:41.120> not<00:00:41.280> trying<00:00:41.360> to<00:00:41.520> glaze<00:00:41.840> them<00:00:42.000> or<00:00:42.160> Elon 00:00:42.470 --> 00:00:42.480 align:start position:0% I'm not trying to glaze them or Elon 00:00:42.480 --> 00:00:44.069 align:start position:0% I'm not trying to glaze them or Elon Musk<00:00:42.719> or<00:00:42.879> anything.<00:00:43.280> I<00:00:43.520> was<00:00:43.600> just<00:00:43.760> very 00:00:44.069 --> 00:00:44.079 align:start position:0% Musk or anything. I was just very 00:00:44.079 --> 00:00:46.470 align:start position:0% Musk or anything. I was just very critical<00:00:44.399> of<00:00:44.559> this<00:00:44.800> lab.<00:00:45.200> In<00:00:45.520> 2025,<00:00:46.239> they 00:00:46.470 --> 00:00:46.480 align:start position:0% critical of this lab. In 2025, they 00:00:46.480 --> 00:00:48.310 align:start position:0% critical of this lab. In 2025, they dropped<00:00:46.800> Grog<00:00:47.120> 4<00:00:47.360> and<00:00:47.600> other<00:00:47.840> models<00:00:48.160> like 00:00:48.310 --> 00:00:48.320 align:start position:0% dropped Grog 4 and other models like 00:00:48.320 --> 00:00:50.389 align:start position:0% dropped Grog 4 and other models like that,<00:00:48.559> but<00:00:48.800> I<00:00:48.960> wasn't<00:00:49.200> really,<00:00:49.920> you<00:00:50.079> know, 00:00:50.389 --> 00:00:50.399 align:start position:0% that, but I wasn't really, you know, 00:00:50.399 --> 00:00:52.229 align:start position:0% that, but I wasn't really, you know, mind<00:00:50.640> blown<00:00:50.960> with<00:00:51.200> their<00:00:51.680> performance 00:00:52.229 --> 00:00:52.239 align:start position:0% mind blown with their performance 00:00:52.239 --> 00:00:53.830 align:start position:0% mind blown with their performance because<00:00:52.480> they're<00:00:52.800> pretty<00:00:53.280> they're<00:00:53.600> pretty 00:00:53.830 --> 00:00:53.840 align:start position:0% because they're pretty they're pretty 00:00:53.840 --> 00:00:55.990 align:start position:0% because they're pretty they're pretty subpar<00:00:54.320> compared<00:00:54.719> to<00:00:54.879> any<00:00:55.120> of<00:00:55.280> the<00:00:55.440> other<00:00:55.600> labs 00:00:55.990 --> 00:00:56.000 align:start position:0% subpar compared to any of the other labs 00:00:56.000 --> 00:00:58.470 align:start position:0% subpar compared to any of the other labs out<00:00:56.160> there.<00:00:56.640> But<00:00:56.800> in<00:00:57.120> 2026,<00:00:57.920> it<00:00:58.160> looks<00:00:58.320> like 00:00:58.470 --> 00:00:58.480 align:start position:0% out there. But in 2026, it looks like 00:00:58.480 --> 00:01:00.069 align:start position:0% out there. But in 2026, it looks like things<00:00:58.800> have<00:00:59.039> kind<00:00:59.280> of<00:00:59.359> changed<00:00:59.680> a<00:00:59.920> little 00:01:00.069 --> 00:01:00.079 align:start position:0% things have kind of changed a little 00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:02.389 align:start position:0% things have kind of changed a little because<00:01:00.320> Grock<00:01:00.719> 4.5<00:01:01.359> was<00:01:01.600> quite<00:01:01.840> competitive 00:01:02.389 --> 00:01:02.399 align:start position:0% because Grock 4.5 was quite competitive 00:01:02.399 --> 00:01:05.590 align:start position:0% because Grock 4.5 was quite competitive based<00:01:02.640> off<00:01:02.800> what<00:01:02.960> it<00:01:03.120> cost<00:01:03.600> and<00:01:03.840> Grock<00:01:04.320> 4.6<00:01:05.199> is 00:01:05.590 --> 00:01:05.600 align:start position:0% based off what it cost and Grock 4.6 is 00:01:05.600 --> 00:01:07.910 align:start position:0% based off what it cost and Grock 4.6 is actually<00:01:06.400> not<00:01:06.640> too<00:01:06.880> bad.<00:01:07.200> If<00:01:07.360> we<00:01:07.520> take<00:01:07.680> a<00:01:07.840> look 00:01:07.910 --> 00:01:07.920 align:start position:0% actually not too bad. If we take a look 00:01:07.920 --> 00:01:09.990 align:start position:0% actually not too bad. If we take a look at<00:01:08.080> the<00:01:08.320> benchmarks,<00:01:09.200> for<00:01:09.280> example,<00:01:09.680> if<00:01:09.840> we 00:01:09.990 --> 00:01:10.000 align:start position:0% at the benchmarks, for example, if we 00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:11.910 align:start position:0% at the benchmarks, for example, if we start<00:01:10.159> with<00:01:10.320> the<00:01:10.560> artificial<00:01:11.200> analysis 00:01:11.910 --> 00:01:11.920 align:start position:0% start with the artificial analysis 00:01:11.920 --> 00:01:14.230 align:start position:0% start with the artificial analysis intelligence<00:01:12.400> index,<00:01:13.200> this<00:01:13.439> model<00:01:13.760> achieves 00:01:14.230 --> 00:01:14.240 align:start position:0% intelligence index, this model achieves 00:01:14.240 --> 00:01:18.149 align:start position:0% intelligence index, this model achieves a<00:01:14.640> 61<00:01:15.200> and<00:01:15.439> Fable<00:01:16.000> 5<00:01:16.240> is<00:01:16.400> at<00:01:16.720> 62.<00:01:17.600> Now,<00:01:17.840> what's 00:01:18.149 --> 00:01:18.159 align:start position:0% a 61 and Fable 5 is at 62. Now, what's 00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:19.670 align:start position:0% a 61 and Fable 5 is at 62. Now, what's really<00:01:18.400> important<00:01:18.640> to<00:01:18.880> remember<00:01:19.119> is<00:01:19.360> that 00:01:19.670 --> 00:01:19.680 align:start position:0% really important to remember is that 00:01:19.680 --> 00:01:22.149 align:start position:0% really important to remember is that once<00:01:19.920> again,<00:01:20.560> this<00:01:20.799> model<00:01:21.200> is<00:01:21.439> quite<00:01:21.759> cheap 00:01:22.149 --> 00:01:22.159 align:start position:0% once again, this model is quite cheap 00:01:22.159 --> 00:01:24.390 align:start position:0% once again, this model is quite cheap compared<00:01:22.479> to<00:01:22.640> Fable<00:01:23.119> 5.<00:01:23.360> This<00:01:23.600> is<00:01:23.759> about<00:01:24.000> $2 00:01:24.390 --> 00:01:24.400 align:start position:0% compared to Fable 5. This is about $2 00:01:24.400 --> 00:01:26.950 align:start position:0% compared to Fable 5. This is about $2 per<00:01:24.560> million<00:01:24.880> input<00:01:25.200> tokens<00:01:25.840> and<00:01:26.240> $6<00:01:26.720> per 00:01:26.950 --> 00:01:26.960 align:start position:0% per million input tokens and $6 per 00:01:26.960 --> 00:01:29.429 align:start position:0% per million input tokens and $6 per million<00:01:27.200> output<00:01:27.600> tokens.<00:01:28.240> In<00:01:28.400> Fable<00:01:28.880> 5<00:01:29.200> sits 00:01:29.429 --> 00:01:29.439 align:start position:0% million output tokens. In Fable 5 sits 00:01:29.439 --> 00:01:32.230 align:start position:0% million output tokens. In Fable 5 sits at<00:01:29.759> $10<00:01:30.159> per<00:01:30.400> million<00:01:30.640> input<00:01:30.960> tokens<00:01:31.360> and<00:01:31.759> $50 00:01:32.230 --> 00:01:32.240 align:start position:0% at $10 per million input tokens and $50 00:01:32.240 --> 00:01:34.390 align:start position:0% at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per<00:01:32.479> million<00:01:32.799> output<00:01:33.119> tokens.<00:01:33.840> And<00:01:34.079> this<00:01:34.240> is 00:01:34.390 --> 00:01:34.400 align:start position:0% per million output tokens. And this is 00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:36.390 align:start position:0% per million output tokens. And this is why<00:01:34.560> you<00:01:34.799> start<00:01:34.960> to<00:01:35.200> appreciate<00:01:35.759> this<00:01:36.079> release 00:01:36.390 --> 00:01:36.400 align:start position:0% why you start to appreciate this release 00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:38.310 align:start position:0% why you start to appreciate this release a<00:01:36.560> little<00:01:36.720> bit<00:01:36.880> more.<00:01:37.280> It<00:01:37.439> might<00:01:37.600> not<00:01:37.840> beat<00:01:38.079> the 00:01:38.310 --> 00:01:38.320 align:start position:0% a little bit more. It might not beat the 00:01:38.320 --> 00:01:39.990 align:start position:0% a little bit more. It might not beat the performance<00:01:38.640> of<00:01:38.880> the<00:01:39.040> best<00:01:39.280> models<00:01:39.840> is 00:01:39.990 --> 00:01:40.000 align:start position:0% performance of the best models is 00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:42.870 align:start position:0% performance of the best models is matching<00:01:40.400> them.<00:01:40.880> Even<00:01:41.119> GBT<00:01:41.759> 5.6<00:01:42.400> so<00:01:42.640> which<00:01:42.799> is 00:01:42.870 --> 00:01:42.880 align:start position:0% matching them. Even GBT 5.6 so which is 00:01:42.880 --> 00:01:44.950 align:start position:0% matching them. Even GBT 5.6 so which is a<00:01:43.280> pretty<00:01:43.600> capable<00:01:44.000> model<00:01:44.320> and<00:01:44.479> this<00:01:44.640> is<00:01:44.799> set 00:01:44.950 --> 00:01:44.960 align:start position:0% a pretty capable model and this is set 00:01:44.960 --> 00:01:47.990 align:start position:0% a pretty capable model and this is set at<00:01:45.200> max<00:01:45.840> on<00:01:46.000> the<00:01:46.159> artificial<00:01:46.720> analysis<00:01:47.280> index. 00:01:47.990 --> 00:01:48.000 align:start position:0% at max on the artificial analysis index. 00:01:48.000 --> 00:01:51.510 align:start position:0% at max on the artificial analysis index. This<00:01:48.240> model<00:01:48.479> achieves<00:01:48.960> 61<00:01:49.439> and<00:01:49.680> Grock<00:01:50.079> 4.6<00:01:51.040> 61. 00:01:51.510 --> 00:01:51.520 align:start position:0% This model achieves 61 and Grock 4.6 61. 00:01:51.520 --> 00:01:53.830 align:start position:0% This model achieves 61 and Grock 4.6 61. So<00:01:51.759> it<00:01:51.920> ties<00:01:52.159> it<00:01:52.320> and<00:01:52.560> it's<00:01:52.799> much<00:01:53.040> cheaper.<00:01:53.680> And 00:01:53.830 --> 00:01:53.840 align:start position:0% So it ties it and it's much cheaper. And 00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:55.109 align:start position:0% So it ties it and it's much cheaper. And then<00:01:54.000> even<00:01:54.240> on<00:01:54.479> all<00:01:54.640> of<00:01:54.720> these<00:01:54.960> other 00:01:55.109 --> 00:01:55.119 align:start position:0% then even on all of these other 00:01:55.119 --> 00:01:57.429 align:start position:0% then even on all of these other benchmarks,<00:01:56.079> for<00:01:56.159> example,<00:01:56.479> the<00:01:56.640> GDP<00:01:57.119> Val 00:01:57.429 --> 00:01:57.439 align:start position:0% benchmarks, for example, the GDP Val 00:01:57.439 --> 00:01:59.590 align:start position:0% benchmarks, for example, the GDP Val one,<00:01:57.759> it<00:01:58.000> actually<00:01:58.320> beats<00:01:58.560> Fable<00:01:59.040> 5,<00:01:59.200> which<00:01:59.439> is 00:01:59.590 --> 00:01:59.600 align:start position:0% one, it actually beats Fable 5, which is 00:01:59.600 --> 00:02:04.149 align:start position:0% one, it actually beats Fable 5, which is at<00:01:59.920> 1741.<00:02:01.040> And<00:02:01.200> then<00:02:01.439> GPT<00:02:02.000> 5.6,<00:02:02.560> it's<00:02:02.799> at<00:02:03.040> 1728. 00:02:04.149 --> 00:02:04.159 align:start position:0% at 1741. And then GPT 5.6, it's at 1728. 00:02:04.159 --> 00:02:05.990 align:start position:0% at 1741. And then GPT 5.6, it's at 1728. I'm<00:02:04.399> not<00:02:04.560> sure<00:02:04.719> why<00:02:04.960> they<00:02:05.119> didn't<00:02:05.280> choose<00:02:05.600> Opus 00:02:05.990 --> 00:02:06.000 align:start position:0% I'm not sure why they didn't choose Opus 00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:07.510 align:start position:0% I'm not sure why they didn't choose Opus 5<00:02:06.240> as<00:02:06.399> well,<00:02:06.560> but<00:02:06.719> I<00:02:06.880> guess<00:02:06.960> they<00:02:07.200> wanted<00:02:07.360> to 00:02:07.510 --> 00:02:07.520 align:start position:0% 5 as well, but I guess they wanted to 00:02:07.520 --> 00:02:09.749 align:start position:0% 5 as well, but I guess they wanted to choose<00:02:07.759> the<00:02:08.319> quote<00:02:08.560> unquote<00:02:09.039> strongest<00:02:09.520> model 00:02:09.749 --> 00:02:09.759 align:start position:0% choose the quote unquote strongest model 00:02:09.759 --> 00:02:11.270 align:start position:0% choose the quote unquote strongest model lineup<00:02:10.160> from<00:02:10.399> each<00:02:10.560> lab.<00:02:10.800> And<00:02:10.959> they<00:02:11.120> chose 00:02:11.270 --> 00:02:11.280 align:start position:0% lineup from each lab. And they chose 00:02:11.280 --> 00:02:13.750 align:start position:0% lineup from each lab. And they chose Fable<00:02:11.680> 5<00:02:11.840> for<00:02:12.000> Enthropic,<00:02:12.800> which<00:02:13.120> is<00:02:13.280> fair. 00:02:13.750 --> 00:02:13.760 align:start position:0% Fable 5 for Enthropic, which is fair. 00:02:13.760 --> 00:02:15.430 align:start position:0% Fable 5 for Enthropic, which is fair. And<00:02:13.840> then<00:02:14.080> Deep<00:02:14.400> Software<00:02:14.800> Engineering<00:02:15.200> one, 00:02:15.430 --> 00:02:15.440 align:start position:0% And then Deep Software Engineering one, 00:02:15.440 --> 00:02:17.510 align:start position:0% And then Deep Software Engineering one, which<00:02:15.599> is<00:02:15.760> a<00:02:15.920> critical<00:02:16.319> benchmark.<00:02:17.280> This 00:02:17.510 --> 00:02:17.520 align:start position:0% which is a critical benchmark. This 00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:20.630 align:start position:0% which is a critical benchmark. This model<00:02:17.920> doesn't<00:02:18.319> beat<00:02:18.879> Fable<00:02:19.360> 5<00:02:19.520> or<00:02:19.760> GPT<00:02:20.239> 5.6 00:02:20.630 --> 00:02:20.640 align:start position:0% model doesn't beat Fable 5 or GPT 5.6 00:02:20.640 --> 00:02:22.470 align:start position:0% model doesn't beat Fable 5 or GPT 5.6 six<00:02:20.879> soul,<00:02:21.200> but<00:02:21.360> it<00:02:21.520> gets<00:02:21.680> close<00:02:21.840> to<00:02:22.000> it.<00:02:22.239> It's 00:02:22.470 --> 00:02:22.480 align:start position:0% six soul, but it gets close to it. It's 00:02:22.480 --> 00:02:26.070 align:start position:0% six soul, but it gets close to it. It's 65.9<00:02:23.520> and<00:02:23.840> Fable<00:02:24.239> 5<00:02:24.400> sits<00:02:24.720> at<00:02:24.959> 70%.<00:02:25.760> But<00:02:25.920> if 00:02:26.070 --> 00:02:26.080 align:start position:0% 65.9 and Fable 5 sits at 70%. But if 00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:27.510 align:start position:0% 65.9 and Fable 5 sits at 70%. But if you're<00:02:26.239> getting<00:02:26.400> results<00:02:26.800> that<00:02:27.040> are<00:02:27.200> pretty 00:02:27.510 --> 00:02:27.520 align:start position:0% you're getting results that are pretty 00:02:27.520 --> 00:02:29.190 align:start position:0% you're getting results that are pretty close<00:02:27.840> and<00:02:28.080> the<00:02:28.319> model<00:02:28.480> is<00:02:28.720> five<00:02:28.879> times 00:02:29.190 --> 00:02:29.200 align:start position:0% close and the model is five times 00:02:29.200 --> 00:02:30.869 align:start position:0% close and the model is five times cheaper,<00:02:29.599> I<00:02:29.840> wouldn't<00:02:30.000> be<00:02:30.160> too<00:02:30.400> disappointed 00:02:30.869 --> 00:02:30.879 align:start position:0% cheaper, I wouldn't be too disappointed 00:02:30.879 --> 00:02:32.550 align:start position:0% cheaper, I wouldn't be too disappointed with<00:02:31.120> this<00:02:31.360> result.<00:02:31.920> And<00:02:32.080> then<00:02:32.239> same<00:02:32.400> thing 00:02:32.550 --> 00:02:32.560 align:start position:0% with this result. And then same thing 00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:34.869 align:start position:0% with this result. And then same thing with<00:02:32.800> Cursor<00:02:33.200> Bench<00:02:33.599> 3.2,<00:02:34.400> the<00:02:34.640> model 00:02:34.869 --> 00:02:34.879 align:start position:0% with Cursor Bench 3.2, the model 00:02:34.879 --> 00:02:36.949 align:start position:0% with Cursor Bench 3.2, the model achieves<00:02:35.360> 69.9%, 00:02:36.949 --> 00:02:36.959 align:start position:0% achieves 69.9%, 00:02:36.959 --> 00:02:40.070 align:start position:0% achieves 69.9%, funny<00:02:37.280> number.<00:02:37.840> And<00:02:38.000> Fable<00:02:38.400> 5<00:02:38.560> sits<00:02:38.879> at<00:02:39.040> 70.5. 00:02:40.070 --> 00:02:40.080 align:start position:0% funny number. And Fable 5 sits at 70.5. 00:02:40.080 --> 00:02:42.390 align:start position:0% funny number. And Fable 5 sits at 70.5. So<00:02:40.319> once<00:02:40.560> again,<00:02:40.800> closer.<00:02:41.200> And<00:02:41.360> Grock<00:02:41.760> 4.6 00:02:42.390 --> 00:02:42.400 align:start position:0% So once again, closer. And Grock 4.6 00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:45.190 align:start position:0% So once again, closer. And Grock 4.6 beats<00:02:42.720> GPT<00:02:43.280> 5.6<00:02:43.920> Soul.<00:02:44.640> Same<00:02:44.800> thing<00:02:44.879> with<00:02:45.040> the 00:02:45.190 --> 00:02:45.200 align:start position:0% beats GPT 5.6 Soul. Same thing with the 00:02:45.200 --> 00:02:47.990 align:start position:0% beats GPT 5.6 Soul. Same thing with the Frontier<00:02:45.680> Code.<00:02:46.239> It<00:02:46.400> gets<00:02:46.640> close<00:02:46.879> to<00:02:47.120> Fable<00:02:47.599> 5, 00:02:47.990 --> 00:02:48.000 align:start position:0% Frontier Code. It gets close to Fable 5, 00:02:48.000 --> 00:02:51.030 align:start position:0% Frontier Code. It gets close to Fable 5, beats<00:02:48.319> GPT<00:02:48.879> 5.6<00:02:49.519> Soul.<00:02:50.000> So<00:02:50.239> yeah,<00:02:50.560> this<00:02:50.720> model 00:02:51.030 --> 00:02:51.040 align:start position:0% beats GPT 5.6 Soul. So yeah, this model 00:02:51.040 --> 00:02:53.270 align:start position:0% beats GPT 5.6 Soul. So yeah, this model is<00:02:51.280> actually<00:02:51.519> available<00:02:52.000> in<00:02:52.239> cursor.<00:02:52.800> So<00:02:53.040> the 00:02:53.270 --> 00:02:53.280 align:start position:0% is actually available in cursor. So the 00:02:53.280 --> 00:02:55.190 align:start position:0% is actually available in cursor. So the partnership<00:02:53.760> with<00:02:54.000> cursor<00:02:54.480> or<00:02:54.720> I<00:02:54.879> guess<00:02:54.959> the 00:02:55.190 --> 00:02:55.200 align:start position:0% partnership with cursor or I guess the 00:02:55.200 --> 00:02:57.350 align:start position:0% partnership with cursor or I guess the acquisition<00:02:56.000> has<00:02:56.239> really<00:02:56.480> helped<00:02:56.800> SpaceX 00:02:57.350 --> 00:02:57.360 align:start position:0% acquisition has really helped SpaceX 00:02:57.360 --> 00:02:59.350 align:start position:0% acquisition has really helped SpaceX make<00:02:57.599> some<00:02:57.840> strides<00:02:58.160> in<00:02:58.319> the<00:02:58.400> AI<00:02:58.800> space<00:02:59.120> this 00:02:59.350 --> 00:02:59.360 align:start position:0% make some strides in the AI space this 00:02:59.360 --> 00:03:01.830 align:start position:0% make some strides in the AI space this year<00:02:59.760> and<00:03:00.080> Grock<00:03:00.480> build<00:03:00.720> is<00:03:00.959> something<00:03:01.120> that 00:03:01.830 --> 00:03:01.840 align:start position:0% year and Grock build is something that 00:03:01.840 --> 00:03:03.670 align:start position:0% year and Grock build is something that you<00:03:02.000> know<00:03:02.239> maybe<00:03:02.560> not<00:03:02.720> a<00:03:02.879> lot<00:03:03.040> of<00:03:03.120> us<00:03:03.280> have<00:03:03.519> been 00:03:03.670 --> 00:03:03.680 align:start position:0% you know maybe not a lot of us have been 00:03:03.680 --> 00:03:05.589 align:start position:0% you know maybe not a lot of us have been using<00:03:04.000> so<00:03:04.239> far<00:03:04.400> but<00:03:04.640> it's<00:03:04.959> probably<00:03:05.200> going<00:03:05.360> to 00:03:05.589 --> 00:03:05.599 align:start position:0% using so far but it's probably going to 00:03:05.599 --> 00:03:08.149 align:start position:0% using so far but it's probably going to be<00:03:06.080> another<00:03:06.560> platform<00:03:07.040> like<00:03:07.280> codeex<00:03:07.760> or<00:03:07.920> cloud 00:03:08.149 --> 00:03:08.159 align:start position:0% be another platform like codeex or cloud 00:03:08.159 --> 00:03:10.309 align:start position:0% be another platform like codeex or cloud code<00:03:08.480> that<00:03:08.720> we<00:03:08.879> start<00:03:09.120> to<00:03:09.360> use<00:03:09.680> but<00:03:09.920> obviously 00:03:10.309 --> 00:03:10.319 align:start position:0% code that we start to use but obviously 00:03:10.319 --> 00:03:12.309 align:start position:0% code that we start to use but obviously cursor<00:03:10.720> is<00:03:10.959> quite<00:03:11.200> strong<00:03:11.440> as<00:03:11.680> well.<00:03:11.920> So<00:03:12.080> you 00:03:12.309 --> 00:03:12.319 align:start position:0% cursor is quite strong as well. So you 00:03:12.319 --> 00:03:14.309 align:start position:0% cursor is quite strong as well. So you have<00:03:12.480> options<00:03:13.040> available<00:03:13.519> for<00:03:13.760> you<00:03:13.920> to<00:03:14.159> use 00:03:14.309 --> 00:03:14.319 align:start position:0% have options available for you to use 00:03:14.319 --> 00:03:16.309 align:start position:0% have options available for you to use them<00:03:14.480> in<00:03:14.720> both.<00:03:15.280> And<00:03:15.440> one<00:03:15.680> thing<00:03:15.760> to<00:03:15.920> note<00:03:16.159> is 00:03:16.309 --> 00:03:16.319 align:start position:0% them in both. And one thing to note is 00:03:16.319 --> 00:03:18.550 align:start position:0% them in both. And one thing to note is that<00:03:16.560> they're<00:03:16.800> offering<00:03:17.280> two<00:03:17.519> times<00:03:18.080> usage 00:03:18.550 --> 00:03:18.560 align:start position:0% that they're offering two times usage 00:03:18.560 --> 00:03:20.550 align:start position:0% that they're offering two times usage inside<00:03:19.040> Grock<00:03:19.440> build<00:03:19.680> and<00:03:19.840> cursor<00:03:20.239> for<00:03:20.400> the 00:03:20.550 --> 00:03:20.560 align:start position:0% inside Grock build and cursor for the 00:03:20.560 --> 00:03:22.229 align:start position:0% inside Grock build and cursor for the first<00:03:20.800> week.<00:03:21.200> So<00:03:21.360> if<00:03:21.519> you<00:03:21.680> just<00:03:21.840> want<00:03:21.920> to<00:03:22.080> try 00:03:22.229 --> 00:03:22.239 align:start position:0% first week. So if you just want to try 00:03:22.239 --> 00:03:24.630 align:start position:0% first week. So if you just want to try it<00:03:22.400> out,<00:03:22.720> see<00:03:22.879> what<00:03:23.040> you<00:03:23.200> feel<00:03:23.440> about<00:03:23.599> it,<00:03:24.239> then 00:03:24.630 --> 00:03:24.640 align:start position:0% it out, see what you feel about it, then 00:03:24.640 --> 00:03:26.390 align:start position:0% it out, see what you feel about it, then you<00:03:24.800> know<00:03:25.040> it<00:03:25.280> might<00:03:25.440> be<00:03:25.599> worth<00:03:25.840> trying<00:03:26.080> it<00:03:26.159> out 00:03:26.390 --> 00:03:26.400 align:start position:0% you know it might be worth trying it out 00:03:26.400 --> 00:03:27.990 align:start position:0% you know it might be worth trying it out right<00:03:26.560> now<00:03:26.720> cuz<00:03:26.959> you<00:03:27.120> get<00:03:27.200> double<00:03:27.519> the<00:03:27.680> usage 00:03:27.990 --> 00:03:28.000 align:start position:0% right now cuz you get double the usage 00:03:28.000 --> 00:03:29.990 align:start position:0% right now cuz you get double the usage in<00:03:28.159> the<00:03:28.319> first<00:03:28.480> week.<00:03:29.200> Now<00:03:29.440> if<00:03:29.599> we<00:03:29.680> were<00:03:29.840> to 00:03:29.990 --> 00:03:30.000 align:start position:0% in the first week. Now if we were to 00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:31.509 align:start position:0% in the first week. Now if we were to take<00:03:30.080> a<00:03:30.239> look<00:03:30.319> at<00:03:30.480> some<00:03:30.640> of<00:03:30.720> the<00:03:30.879> outputs<00:03:31.280> that 00:03:31.509 --> 00:03:31.519 align:start position:0% take a look at some of the outputs that 00:03:31.519 --> 00:03:33.270 align:start position:0% take a look at some of the outputs that people<00:03:31.760> have<00:03:32.000> been<00:03:32.159> generating<00:03:32.560> with<00:03:32.879> Grock 00:03:33.270 --> 00:03:33.280 align:start position:0% people have been generating with Grock 00:03:33.280 --> 00:03:35.509 align:start position:0% people have been generating with Grock 4.6,<00:03:34.239> what<00:03:34.480> we're<00:03:34.640> looking<00:03:34.799> at<00:03:34.959> right<00:03:35.120> now<00:03:35.280> is 00:03:35.509 --> 00:03:35.519 align:start position:0% 4.6, what we're looking at right now is 00:03:35.519 --> 00:03:38.070 align:start position:0% 4.6, what we're looking at right now is a<00:03:35.920> Falcon<00:03:36.400> 9<00:03:36.640> booster<00:03:37.200> return<00:03:37.680> sequence 00:03:38.070 --> 00:03:38.080 align:start position:0% a Falcon 9 booster return sequence 00:03:38.080 --> 00:03:39.990 align:start position:0% a Falcon 9 booster return sequence simulation.<00:03:38.799> And<00:03:39.040> this<00:03:39.280> was<00:03:39.440> done<00:03:39.599> in<00:03:39.840> a 00:03:39.990 --> 00:03:40.000 align:start position:0% simulation. And this was done in a 00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:43.350 align:start position:0% simulation. And this was done in a single<00:03:40.319> HTML<00:03:41.040> file.<00:03:41.920> And<00:03:42.239> as<00:03:42.480> I<00:03:42.640> said,<00:03:42.959> if<00:03:43.200> you 00:03:43.350 --> 00:03:43.360 align:start position:0% single HTML file. And as I said, if you 00:03:43.360 --> 00:03:45.350 align:start position:0% single HTML file. And as I said, if you expected<00:03:43.840> to<00:03:44.080> get<00:03:44.239> this<00:03:44.480> type<00:03:44.640> of<00:03:44.799> output<00:03:45.120> from 00:03:45.350 --> 00:03:45.360 align:start position:0% expected to get this type of output from 00:03:45.360 --> 00:03:48.550 align:start position:0% expected to get this type of output from Grock<00:03:45.840> in<00:03:46.159> 2025,<00:03:47.360> you<00:03:47.599> would<00:03:47.760> be<00:03:47.920> kind<00:03:48.159> of 00:03:48.550 --> 00:03:48.560 align:start position:0% Grock in 2025, you would be kind of 00:03:48.560 --> 00:03:50.070 align:start position:0% Grock in 2025, you would be kind of surprised<00:03:49.040> because<00:03:49.280> you<00:03:49.519> wouldn't<00:03:49.760> expect 00:03:50.070 --> 00:03:50.080 align:start position:0% surprised because you wouldn't expect 00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:51.670 align:start position:0% surprised because you wouldn't expect something<00:03:50.319> like<00:03:50.480> this<00:03:50.720> to<00:03:50.879> be<00:03:51.040> generated<00:03:51.519> with 00:03:51.670 --> 00:03:51.680 align:start position:0% something like this to be generated with 00:03:51.680 --> 00:03:53.350 align:start position:0% something like this to be generated with Grock.<00:03:52.159> But<00:03:52.319> now<00:03:52.400> it<00:03:52.640> looks<00:03:52.799> like<00:03:52.879> we<00:03:53.120> have<00:03:53.200> to 00:03:53.350 --> 00:03:53.360 align:start position:0% Grock. But now it looks like we have to 00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:55.110 align:start position:0% Grock. But now it looks like we have to start<00:03:53.599> taking<00:03:53.920> the<00:03:54.080> Grock<00:03:54.480> team<00:03:54.640> a<00:03:54.879> little<00:03:54.959> bit 00:03:55.110 --> 00:03:55.120 align:start position:0% start taking the Grock team a little bit 00:03:55.120 --> 00:03:57.350 align:start position:0% start taking the Grock team a little bit more<00:03:55.280> serious<00:03:55.760> because<00:03:56.560> this<00:03:56.799> output<00:03:57.200> is 00:03:57.350 --> 00:03:57.360 align:start position:0% more serious because this output is 00:03:57.360 --> 00:03:59.350 align:start position:0% more serious because this output is quite<00:03:57.680> competitive.<00:03:58.560> And<00:03:58.720> obviously,<00:03:59.120> we're 00:03:59.350 --> 00:03:59.360 align:start position:0% quite competitive. And obviously, we're 00:03:59.360 --> 00:04:01.110 align:start position:0% quite competitive. And obviously, we're just<00:03:59.519> looking<00:03:59.760> at<00:03:59.920> a<00:04:00.159> simulation<00:04:00.640> and<00:04:00.879> we're 00:04:01.110 --> 00:04:01.120 align:start position:0% just looking at a simulation and we're 00:04:01.120 --> 00:04:02.869 align:start position:0% just looking at a simulation and we're just<00:04:01.280> basing<00:04:01.599> it<00:04:01.840> off<00:04:02.000> of<00:04:02.159> a<00:04:02.480> visual 00:04:02.869 --> 00:04:02.879 align:start position:0% just basing it off of a visual 00:04:02.879 --> 00:04:04.949 align:start position:0% just basing it off of a visual representation.<00:04:03.920> But<00:04:04.080> if<00:04:04.319> the<00:04:04.400> model<00:04:04.640> is<00:04:04.799> able 00:04:04.949 --> 00:04:04.959 align:start position:0% representation. But if the model is able 00:04:04.959 --> 00:04:06.070 align:start position:0% representation. But if the model is able to<00:04:05.120> produce<00:04:05.439> something<00:04:05.680> like<00:04:05.840> this 00:04:06.070 --> 00:04:06.080 align:start position:0% to produce something like this 00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:08.390 align:start position:0% to produce something like this consistently,<00:04:07.040> then<00:04:07.360> I<00:04:07.599> would<00:04:07.760> expect<00:04:08.080> a<00:04:08.319> lot 00:04:08.390 --> 00:04:08.400 align:start position:0% consistently, then I would expect a lot 00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:10.149 align:start position:0% consistently, then I would expect a lot of<00:04:08.560> people<00:04:08.720> to<00:04:09.040> start<00:04:09.280> adopting<00:04:09.760> Grock 00:04:10.149 --> 00:04:10.159 align:start position:0% of people to start adopting Grock 00:04:10.159 --> 00:04:11.830 align:start position:0% of people to start adopting Grock because<00:04:10.480> number<00:04:10.640> one,<00:04:11.040> it<00:04:11.280> is<00:04:11.439> cheaper<00:04:11.680> than 00:04:11.830 --> 00:04:11.840 align:start position:0% because number one, it is cheaper than 00:04:11.840 --> 00:04:13.670 align:start position:0% because number one, it is cheaper than the<00:04:12.080> other<00:04:12.239> labs<00:04:12.720> at<00:04:12.720> least<00:04:12.959> at<00:04:13.200> the<00:04:13.360> moment 00:04:13.670 --> 00:04:13.680 align:start position:0% the other labs at least at the moment 00:04:13.680 --> 00:04:15.110 align:start position:0% the other labs at least at the moment because<00:04:13.920> we<00:04:14.159> don't<00:04:14.239> know<00:04:14.319> if<00:04:14.480> this<00:04:14.720> pricing 00:04:15.110 --> 00:04:15.120 align:start position:0% because we don't know if this pricing 00:04:15.120 --> 00:04:17.030 align:start position:0% because we don't know if this pricing strategy<00:04:15.599> is<00:04:15.840> going<00:04:15.920> to<00:04:16.079> be<00:04:16.320> sustainable<00:04:16.799> for 00:04:17.030 --> 00:04:17.040 align:start position:0% strategy is going to be sustainable for 00:04:17.040 --> 00:04:19.030 align:start position:0% strategy is going to be sustainable for the<00:04:17.199> SpaceX<00:04:17.680> team<00:04:17.919> in<00:04:18.079> the<00:04:18.160> long<00:04:18.320> run.<00:04:18.959> But<00:04:19.040> at 00:04:19.030 --> 00:04:19.040 align:start position:0% the SpaceX team in the long run. But at 00:04:19.040 --> 00:04:20.550 align:start position:0% the SpaceX team in the long run. But at least<00:04:19.359> for<00:04:19.519> now,<00:04:19.759> their<00:04:20.000> models<00:04:20.320> are 00:04:20.550 --> 00:04:20.560 align:start position:0% least for now, their models are 00:04:20.560 --> 00:04:22.069 align:start position:0% least for now, their models are definitely<00:04:20.959> cheaper<00:04:21.440> compared<00:04:21.759> to<00:04:21.919> the 00:04:22.069 --> 00:04:22.079 align:start position:0% definitely cheaper compared to the 00:04:22.079 --> 00:04:24.150 align:start position:0% definitely cheaper compared to the others.<00:04:22.720> And<00:04:22.880> as<00:04:23.120> I<00:04:23.280> mentioned,<00:04:23.600> this<00:04:23.840> model 00:04:24.150 --> 00:04:24.160 align:start position:0% others. And as I mentioned, this model 00:04:24.160 --> 00:04:26.150 align:start position:0% others. And as I mentioned, this model excelled<00:04:24.639> at<00:04:24.800> the<00:04:25.040> artificial<00:04:25.520> analysis 00:04:26.150 --> 00:04:26.160 align:start position:0% excelled at the artificial analysis 00:04:26.160 --> 00:04:28.790 align:start position:0% excelled at the artificial analysis index.<00:04:26.800> This<00:04:27.040> model<00:04:27.360> jumped<00:04:27.759> to<00:04:28.240> probably 00:04:28.790 --> 00:04:28.800 align:start position:0% index. This model jumped to probably 00:04:28.800 --> 00:04:32.710 align:start position:0% index. This model jumped to probably number<00:04:29.199> four<00:04:29.520> model.<00:04:30.240> It's<00:04:30.479> tied<00:04:30.880> to<00:04:31.120> GPT<00:04:31.759> 5.6 00:04:32.710 --> 00:04:32.720 align:start position:0% number four model. It's tied to GPT 5.6 00:04:32.720 --> 00:04:33.990 align:start position:0% number four model. It's tied to GPT 5.6 pretty<00:04:32.960> much<00:04:33.120> similar.<00:04:33.440> So<00:04:33.520> you<00:04:33.680> could<00:04:33.840> say 00:04:33.990 --> 00:04:34.000 align:start position:0% pretty much similar. So you could say 00:04:34.000 --> 00:04:35.749 align:start position:0% pretty much similar. So you could say number<00:04:34.240> three<00:04:34.479> as<00:04:34.720> well,<00:04:35.040> but<00:04:35.280> the<00:04:35.440> models 00:04:35.749 --> 00:04:35.759 align:start position:0% number three as well, but the models 00:04:35.759 --> 00:04:38.629 align:start position:0% number three as well, but the models before<00:04:36.160> that<00:04:36.400> are<00:04:36.639> Fable<00:04:37.120> 5<00:04:37.280> and<00:04:37.440> Opus<00:04:37.919> 5, 00:04:38.629 --> 00:04:38.639 align:start position:0% before that are Fable 5 and Opus 5, 00:04:38.639 --> 00:04:40.710 align:start position:0% before that are Fable 5 and Opus 5, which<00:04:38.880> are<00:04:39.040> only<00:04:39.280> above<00:04:39.600> the<00:04:39.759> model<00:04:40.080> by<00:04:40.479> about 00:04:40.710 --> 00:04:40.720 align:start position:0% which are only above the model by about 00:04:40.720 --> 00:04:43.830 align:start position:0% which are only above the model by about a<00:04:40.960> 1%<00:04:41.520> or<00:04:41.759> a<00:04:42.080> 2%<00:04:42.639> difference.<00:04:43.280> So<00:04:43.440> yeah,<00:04:43.680> even 00:04:43.830 --> 00:04:43.840 align:start position:0% a 1% or a 2% difference. So yeah, even 00:04:43.840 --> 00:04:45.990 align:start position:0% a 1% or a 2% difference. So yeah, even on<00:04:44.080> this<00:04:44.400> intelligence<00:04:44.960> index,<00:04:45.360> which<00:04:45.759> if 00:04:45.990 --> 00:04:46.000 align:start position:0% on this intelligence index, which if 00:04:46.000 --> 00:04:47.510 align:start position:0% on this intelligence index, which if you're<00:04:46.160> not<00:04:46.320> familiar<00:04:46.639> with<00:04:46.960> has<00:04:47.199> nine 00:04:47.510 --> 00:04:47.520 align:start position:0% you're not familiar with has nine 00:04:47.520 --> 00:04:49.350 align:start position:0% you're not familiar with has nine evaluations.<00:04:48.400> So<00:04:48.560> on<00:04:48.800> all<00:04:48.960> of<00:04:49.040> these 00:04:49.350 --> 00:04:49.360 align:start position:0% evaluations. So on all of these 00:04:49.360 --> 00:04:51.430 align:start position:0% evaluations. So on all of these evaluations,<00:04:50.160> it's<00:04:50.479> kind<00:04:50.639> of<00:04:50.800> matching 00:04:51.430 --> 00:04:51.440 align:start position:0% evaluations, it's kind of matching 00:04:51.440 --> 00:04:53.590 align:start position:0% evaluations, it's kind of matching almost<00:04:52.000> Fable<00:04:52.479> 5<00:04:52.720> performance,<00:04:53.199> which<00:04:53.440> is 00:04:53.590 --> 00:04:53.600 align:start position:0% almost Fable 5 performance, which is 00:04:53.600 --> 00:04:56.230 align:start position:0% almost Fable 5 performance, which is crazy<00:04:53.919> to<00:04:54.160> see.<00:04:54.880> Before<00:04:55.199> we<00:04:55.440> continue,<00:04:56.000> we 00:04:56.230 --> 00:04:56.240 align:start position:0% crazy to see. Before we continue, we 00:04:56.240 --> 00:04:57.830 align:start position:0% crazy to see. Before we continue, we just<00:04:56.479> launched<00:04:56.800> the<00:04:56.960> Universe<00:04:57.280> of<00:04:57.520> AI 00:04:57.830 --> 00:04:57.840 align:start position:0% just launched the Universe of AI 00:04:57.840 --> 00:04:59.590 align:start position:0% just launched the Universe of AI newsletter.<00:04:58.639> If<00:04:58.880> you<00:04:58.960> want<00:04:59.040> to<00:04:59.199> stay<00:04:59.360> on<00:04:59.520> top 00:04:59.590 --> 00:04:59.600 align:start position:0% newsletter. If you want to stay on top 00:04:59.600 --> 00:05:01.590 align:start position:0% newsletter. If you want to stay on top of<00:04:59.759> AI<00:05:00.160> news<00:05:00.479> without<00:05:00.800> having<00:05:01.040> to<00:05:01.199> hunt<00:05:01.440> for 00:05:01.590 --> 00:05:01.600 align:start position:0% of AI news without having to hunt for 00:05:01.600 --> 00:05:03.670 align:start position:0% of AI news without having to hunt for it,<00:05:02.000> link<00:05:02.240> is<00:05:02.400> in<00:05:02.560> the<00:05:02.720> description.<00:05:03.440> Don't 00:05:03.670 --> 00:05:03.680 align:start position:0% it, link is in the description. Don't 00:05:03.680 --> 00:05:05.510 align:start position:0% it, link is in the description. Don't miss<00:05:03.919> out.<00:05:04.560> And<00:05:04.720> what<00:05:04.880> you<00:05:05.040> see<00:05:05.120> on<00:05:05.360> screen 00:05:05.510 --> 00:05:05.520 align:start position:0% miss out. And what you see on screen 00:05:05.520 --> 00:05:07.670 align:start position:0% miss out. And what you see on screen right<00:05:05.759> now<00:05:05.840> is<00:05:06.000> a<00:05:06.240> racing<00:05:06.560> game<00:05:06.800> that<00:05:07.280> Grock 00:05:07.670 --> 00:05:07.680 align:start position:0% right now is a racing game that Grock 00:05:07.680 --> 00:05:10.390 align:start position:0% right now is a racing game that Grock 4.6<00:05:08.479> build.<00:05:09.039> And<00:05:09.199> based<00:05:09.440> off<00:05:09.600> of<00:05:09.759> this<00:05:10.000> post, 00:05:10.390 --> 00:05:10.400 align:start position:0% 4.6 build. And based off of this post, 00:05:10.400 --> 00:05:12.310 align:start position:0% 4.6 build. And based off of this post, the<00:05:10.560> model<00:05:10.880> took<00:05:11.120> about<00:05:11.360> 1<00:05:11.600> minute<00:05:11.840> and<00:05:12.080> it<00:05:12.240> was 00:05:12.310 --> 00:05:12.320 align:start position:0% the model took about 1 minute and it was 00:05:12.320 --> 00:05:14.390 align:start position:0% the model took about 1 minute and it was a<00:05:12.479> fiveword<00:05:12.960> prompt,<00:05:13.360> which<00:05:13.520> was<00:05:13.680> a<00:05:13.919> create<00:05:14.160> a 00:05:14.390 --> 00:05:14.400 align:start position:0% a fiveword prompt, which was a create a 00:05:14.400 --> 00:05:16.629 align:start position:0% a fiveword prompt, which was a create a simple<00:05:14.720> racing<00:05:15.039> game<00:05:15.199> in<00:05:15.440> HTML.<00:05:16.320> So,<00:05:16.479> if 00:05:16.629 --> 00:05:16.639 align:start position:0% simple racing game in HTML. So, if 00:05:16.639 --> 00:05:17.909 align:start position:0% simple racing game in HTML. So, if you're<00:05:16.800> able<00:05:16.960> to<00:05:17.120> generate<00:05:17.440> something<00:05:17.680> like 00:05:17.909 --> 00:05:17.919 align:start position:0% you're able to generate something like 00:05:17.919 --> 00:05:20.950 align:start position:0% you're able to generate something like this<00:05:18.479> easily<00:05:19.199> using<00:05:19.520> Grock<00:05:19.919> 4.6,<00:05:20.560> I<00:05:20.720> think<00:05:20.800> a 00:05:20.950 --> 00:05:20.960 align:start position:0% this easily using Grock 4.6, I think a 00:05:20.960 --> 00:05:22.870 align:start position:0% this easily using Grock 4.6, I think a lot<00:05:21.039> of<00:05:21.120> people<00:05:21.280> will<00:05:21.520> be<00:05:21.680> happy.<00:05:22.400> And<00:05:22.560> this<00:05:22.720> is 00:05:22.870 --> 00:05:22.880 align:start position:0% lot of people will be happy. And this is 00:05:22.880 --> 00:05:25.189 align:start position:0% lot of people will be happy. And this is a<00:05:23.039> more<00:05:23.199> detailed<00:05:23.680> analysis<00:05:24.160> of<00:05:24.720> what<00:05:24.960> it 00:05:25.189 --> 00:05:25.199 align:start position:0% a more detailed analysis of what it 00:05:25.199 --> 00:05:27.909 align:start position:0% a more detailed analysis of what it costs<00:05:25.440> to<00:05:25.680> run<00:05:25.919> GPT<00:05:26.479> 5.6<00:05:26.960> 6<00:05:27.120> on<00:05:27.280> the<00:05:27.360> artificial 00:05:27.909 --> 00:05:27.919 align:start position:0% costs to run GPT 5.6 6 on the artificial 00:05:27.919 --> 00:05:29.909 align:start position:0% costs to run GPT 5.6 6 on the artificial analysis<00:05:28.400> index<00:05:28.800> and<00:05:29.039> what<00:05:29.280> it<00:05:29.520> produced 00:05:29.909 --> 00:05:29.919 align:start position:0% analysis index and what it produced 00:05:29.919 --> 00:05:31.990 align:start position:0% analysis index and what it produced meaning<00:05:30.160> the<00:05:30.479> output.<00:05:31.120> Both<00:05:31.360> of<00:05:31.440> these<00:05:31.680> models 00:05:31.990 --> 00:05:32.000 align:start position:0% meaning the output. Both of these models 00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:34.150 align:start position:0% meaning the output. Both of these models if<00:05:32.160> you<00:05:32.400> remember<00:05:32.880> scored<00:05:33.280> 61<00:05:33.840> on<00:05:34.000> the 00:05:34.150 --> 00:05:34.160 align:start position:0% if you remember scored 61 on the 00:05:34.160 --> 00:05:36.230 align:start position:0% if you remember scored 61 on the artificial<00:05:34.639> analysis<00:05:35.199> index.<00:05:35.680> Now<00:05:35.919> to<00:05:36.080> run 00:05:36.230 --> 00:05:36.240 align:start position:0% artificial analysis index. Now to run 00:05:36.240 --> 00:05:38.870 align:start position:0% artificial analysis index. Now to run the<00:05:36.400> whole<00:05:36.560> test<00:05:36.880> with<00:05:37.039> GPT<00:05:37.600> 5.6<00:05:38.479> it<00:05:38.639> cost 00:05:38.870 --> 00:05:38.880 align:start position:0% the whole test with GPT 5.6 it cost 00:05:38.880 --> 00:05:42.390 align:start position:0% the whole test with GPT 5.6 it cost about<00:05:39.199> 2.8K<00:05:40.400> and<00:05:40.560> then<00:05:40.720> with<00:05:40.960> Grock<00:05:41.360> 4.6<00:05:42.160> it 00:05:42.390 --> 00:05:42.400 align:start position:0% about 2.8K and then with Grock 4.6 it 00:05:42.400 --> 00:05:45.350 align:start position:0% about 2.8K and then with Grock 4.6 it cost<00:05:42.639> about<00:05:42.880> 1.1Kish.<00:05:44.320> And<00:05:44.560> this<00:05:44.800> tells<00:05:44.960> you 00:05:45.350 --> 00:05:45.360 align:start position:0% cost about 1.1Kish. And this tells you 00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:46.950 align:start position:0% cost about 1.1Kish. And this tells you that<00:05:45.520> you're<00:05:45.759> getting<00:05:46.080> similar<00:05:46.479> level<00:05:46.800> of 00:05:46.950 --> 00:05:46.960 align:start position:0% that you're getting similar level of 00:05:46.960 --> 00:05:49.189 align:start position:0% that you're getting similar level of performance<00:05:47.440> at<00:05:47.759> half<00:05:47.919> the<00:05:48.160> cost.<00:05:48.479> So<00:05:48.720> yeah, 00:05:49.189 --> 00:05:49.199 align:start position:0% performance at half the cost. So yeah, 00:05:49.199 --> 00:05:51.110 align:start position:0% performance at half the cost. So yeah, this<00:05:49.440> is<00:05:49.600> a<00:05:49.840> big<00:05:50.080> release<00:05:50.320> for<00:05:50.479> the<00:05:50.639> SpaceX 00:05:51.110 --> 00:05:51.120 align:start position:0% this is a big release for the SpaceX 00:05:51.120 --> 00:05:52.629 align:start position:0% this is a big release for the SpaceX team<00:05:51.280> because<00:05:51.520> they<00:05:51.759> just<00:05:51.840> proved<00:05:52.160> once<00:05:52.479> again 00:05:52.629 --> 00:05:52.639 align:start position:0% team because they just proved once again 00:05:52.639 --> 00:05:54.390 align:start position:0% team because they just proved once again that<00:05:52.880> they<00:05:53.120> are<00:05:53.199> a<00:05:53.360> lab<00:05:53.600> that<00:05:53.759> you<00:05:54.000> seriously 00:05:54.390 --> 00:05:54.400 align:start position:0% that they are a lab that you seriously 00:05:54.400 --> 00:05:56.310 align:start position:0% that they are a lab that you seriously start<00:05:54.720> need<00:05:54.800> to<00:05:55.039> considering,<00:05:55.680> especially<00:05:56.080> in 00:05:56.310 --> 00:05:56.320 align:start position:0% start need to considering, especially in 00:05:56.320 --> 00:05:58.550 align:start position:0% start need to considering, especially in 2026.<00:05:57.360> And<00:05:57.520> I'm<00:05:57.680> going<00:05:57.759> to<00:05:57.919> talk<00:05:58.080> more<00:05:58.320> about 00:05:58.550 --> 00:05:58.560 align:start position:0% 2026. And I'm going to talk more about 00:05:58.560 --> 00:06:01.110 align:start position:0% 2026. And I'm going to talk more about Deep<00:05:58.880> Seek<00:05:59.199> version<00:05:59.520> 4<00:05:59.759> Pro<00:06:00.080> GA.<00:06:00.800> But 00:06:01.110 --> 00:06:01.120 align:start position:0% Deep Seek version 4 Pro GA. But 00:06:01.120 --> 00:06:02.870 align:start position:0% Deep Seek version 4 Pro GA. But basically<00:06:01.680> what<00:06:01.919> we're<00:06:02.160> seeing<00:06:02.400> today<00:06:02.639> is 00:06:02.870 --> 00:06:02.880 align:start position:0% basically what we're seeing today is 00:06:02.880 --> 00:06:04.629 align:start position:0% basically what we're seeing today is that<00:06:03.199> both<00:06:03.440> of<00:06:03.520> these<00:06:03.759> releases<00:06:04.319> kind<00:06:04.560> of 00:06:04.629 --> 00:06:04.639 align:start position:0% that both of these releases kind of 00:06:04.639 --> 00:06:07.350 align:start position:0% that both of these releases kind of emphasize<00:06:05.199> the<00:06:05.520> fact<00:06:05.680> that<00:06:06.400> performance<00:06:07.039> and 00:06:07.350 --> 00:06:07.360 align:start position:0% emphasize the fact that performance and 00:06:07.360 --> 00:06:09.189 align:start position:0% emphasize the fact that performance and all<00:06:07.520> above<00:06:07.840> that<00:06:08.080> is<00:06:08.319> the<00:06:08.479> price<00:06:08.800> at<00:06:09.039> what 00:06:09.189 --> 00:06:09.199 align:start position:0% all above that is the price at what 00:06:09.199 --> 00:06:10.629 align:start position:0% all above that is the price at what you're<00:06:09.440> getting<00:06:09.600> for<00:06:09.759> that<00:06:10.000> performance<00:06:10.400> is 00:06:10.629 --> 00:06:10.639 align:start position:0% you're getting for that performance is 00:06:10.639 --> 00:06:12.469 align:start position:0% you're getting for that performance is becoming<00:06:10.960> more<00:06:11.120> and<00:06:11.360> more<00:06:11.520> important<00:06:11.919> for<00:06:12.160> all 00:06:12.469 --> 00:06:12.479 align:start position:0% becoming more and more important for all 00:06:12.479 --> 00:06:14.790 align:start position:0% becoming more and more important for all users<00:06:13.120> because<00:06:13.440> we<00:06:13.680> see<00:06:13.840> many<00:06:14.160> labs<00:06:14.560> now 00:06:14.790 --> 00:06:14.800 align:start position:0% users because we see many labs now 00:06:14.800 --> 00:06:17.029 align:start position:0% users because we see many labs now focusing<00:06:15.280> on<00:06:15.680> creating<00:06:16.000> the<00:06:16.240> best<00:06:16.479> model<00:06:16.800> at 00:06:17.029 --> 00:06:17.039 align:start position:0% focusing on creating the best model at 00:06:17.039 --> 00:06:19.590 align:start position:0% focusing on creating the best model at the<00:06:17.199> cheapest<00:06:17.600> cost.<00:06:18.319> Last<00:06:18.479> year<00:06:18.639> in<00:06:18.880> 2025 00:06:19.590 --> 00:06:19.600 align:start position:0% the cheapest cost. Last year in 2025 00:06:19.600 --> 00:06:21.670 align:start position:0% the cheapest cost. Last year in 2025 most<00:06:19.759> of<00:06:19.840> the<00:06:20.000> labs<00:06:20.400> were<00:06:20.560> just<00:06:20.800> focused<00:06:21.120> on<00:06:21.440> I 00:06:21.670 --> 00:06:21.680 align:start position:0% most of the labs were just focused on I 00:06:21.680 --> 00:06:24.390 align:start position:0% most of the labs were just focused on I would<00:06:21.840> say<00:06:22.479> creating<00:06:22.880> the<00:06:23.199> strongest<00:06:23.759> model. 00:06:24.390 --> 00:06:24.400 align:start position:0% would say creating the strongest model. 00:06:24.400 --> 00:06:26.070 align:start position:0% would say creating the strongest model. Yes,<00:06:24.720> cost<00:06:24.960> was<00:06:25.199> important,<00:06:25.520> but<00:06:25.759> I<00:06:25.919> think 00:06:26.070 --> 00:06:26.080 align:start position:0% Yes, cost was important, but I think 00:06:26.080 --> 00:06:27.830 align:start position:0% Yes, cost was important, but I think most<00:06:26.240> of<00:06:26.319> the<00:06:26.479> times<00:06:26.800> the<00:06:26.960> frontier<00:06:27.440> labs, 00:06:27.830 --> 00:06:27.840 align:start position:0% most of the times the frontier labs, 00:06:27.840 --> 00:06:30.070 align:start position:0% most of the times the frontier labs, meaning<00:06:28.080> OpenAI,<00:06:28.639> Enthropic,<00:06:29.520> were<00:06:29.840> kind<00:06:29.919> of 00:06:30.070 --> 00:06:30.080 align:start position:0% meaning OpenAI, Enthropic, were kind of 00:06:30.080 --> 00:06:31.749 align:start position:0% meaning OpenAI, Enthropic, were kind of more<00:06:30.240> lenient<00:06:30.639> on<00:06:30.800> that<00:06:31.039> fact<00:06:31.280> because<00:06:31.520> they 00:06:31.749 --> 00:06:31.759 align:start position:0% more lenient on that fact because they 00:06:31.759 --> 00:06:33.990 align:start position:0% more lenient on that fact because they didn't<00:06:32.000> have<00:06:32.240> as<00:06:32.560> strong<00:06:32.720> of<00:06:32.960> a<00:06:33.120> competition. 00:06:33.990 --> 00:06:34.000 align:start position:0% didn't have as strong of a competition. 00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:36.469 align:start position:0% didn't have as strong of a competition. Intelligent<00:06:34.639> models<00:06:35.039> that<00:06:35.280> are<00:06:35.759> maybe<00:06:36.160> not 00:06:36.469 --> 00:06:36.479 align:start position:0% Intelligent models that are maybe not 00:06:36.479 --> 00:06:39.029 align:start position:0% Intelligent models that are maybe not always<00:06:36.880> ahead<00:06:37.360> of<00:06:37.600> OpenAI<00:06:38.160> Enthropic,<00:06:38.800> but 00:06:39.029 --> 00:06:39.039 align:start position:0% always ahead of OpenAI Enthropic, but 00:06:39.039 --> 00:06:40.710 align:start position:0% always ahead of OpenAI Enthropic, but match<00:06:39.280> their<00:06:39.520> performance<00:06:39.919> at<00:06:40.160> a<00:06:40.319> fraction<00:06:40.560> of 00:06:40.710 --> 00:06:40.720 align:start position:0% match their performance at a fraction of 00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:42.790 align:start position:0% match their performance at a fraction of the<00:06:40.880> cost.<00:06:41.199> So<00:06:41.360> yes,<00:06:41.759> price<00:06:42.080> toerformance 00:06:42.790 --> 00:06:42.800 align:start position:0% the cost. So yes, price toerformance 00:06:42.800 --> 00:06:45.670 align:start position:0% the cost. So yes, price toerformance ratio<00:06:43.199> is<00:06:43.440> becoming<00:06:43.759> a<00:06:44.080> critical<00:06:44.880> I<00:06:45.039> would<00:06:45.199> say 00:06:45.670 --> 00:06:45.680 align:start position:0% ratio is becoming a critical I would say 00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:48.629 align:start position:0% ratio is becoming a critical I would say indicator<00:06:46.240> in<00:06:46.560> 2026.<00:06:47.840> Now,<00:06:48.080> this<00:06:48.240> is<00:06:48.400> the 00:06:48.629 --> 00:06:48.639 align:start position:0% indicator in 2026. Now, this is the 00:06:48.639 --> 00:06:50.469 align:start position:0% indicator in 2026. Now, this is the updated<00:06:49.120> benchmark<00:06:49.600> chart<00:06:49.919> after<00:06:50.240> the 00:06:50.469 --> 00:06:50.479 align:start position:0% updated benchmark chart after the 00:06:50.479 --> 00:06:52.230 align:start position:0% updated benchmark chart after the release<00:06:50.720> of<00:06:50.800> the<00:06:51.039> new<00:06:51.199> model.<00:06:51.680> And<00:06:51.919> one<00:06:52.160> thing 00:06:52.230 --> 00:06:52.240 align:start position:0% release of the new model. And one thing 00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:53.909 align:start position:0% release of the new model. And one thing you'll<00:06:52.479> see<00:06:52.639> across<00:06:52.960> the<00:06:53.199> board<00:06:53.360> is<00:06:53.600> that<00:06:53.759> it 00:06:53.909 --> 00:06:53.919 align:start position:0% you'll see across the board is that it 00:06:53.919 --> 00:06:55.909 align:start position:0% you'll see across the board is that it matches<00:06:54.319> the<00:06:54.560> top<00:06:54.880> level<00:06:55.199> performance<00:06:55.680> of 00:06:55.909 --> 00:06:55.919 align:start position:0% matches the top level performance of 00:06:55.919 --> 00:06:57.350 align:start position:0% matches the top level performance of many<00:06:56.080> of<00:06:56.240> the<00:06:56.400> models.<00:06:56.880> The<00:06:57.039> one<00:06:57.199> thing 00:06:57.350 --> 00:06:57.360 align:start position:0% many of the models. The one thing 00:06:57.360 --> 00:06:58.469 align:start position:0% many of the models. The one thing interesting<00:06:57.680> over<00:06:57.919> here<00:06:58.000> is<00:06:58.160> that<00:06:58.319> they 00:06:58.469 --> 00:06:58.479 align:start position:0% interesting over here is that they 00:06:58.479 --> 00:07:00.629 align:start position:0% interesting over here is that they haven't<00:06:58.639> put<00:06:58.800> Opus<00:06:59.280> 5<00:06:59.520> here<00:06:59.759> for<00:07:00.000> some<00:07:00.160> reason. 00:07:00.629 --> 00:07:00.639 align:start position:0% haven't put Opus 5 here for some reason. 00:07:00.639 --> 00:07:02.230 align:start position:0% haven't put Opus 5 here for some reason. There<00:07:00.800> is<00:07:00.960> Fable<00:07:01.360> 5<00:07:01.599> here<00:07:01.759> that<00:07:02.000> we<00:07:02.160> can 00:07:02.230 --> 00:07:02.240 align:start position:0% There is Fable 5 here that we can 00:07:02.240 --> 00:07:03.990 align:start position:0% There is Fable 5 here that we can compare<00:07:02.560> this<00:07:02.800> model<00:07:03.120> against.<00:07:03.680> But<00:07:03.840> one 00:07:03.990 --> 00:07:04.000 align:start position:0% compare this model against. But one 00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:05.990 align:start position:0% compare this model against. But one thing<00:07:04.160> you'll<00:07:04.400> notice<00:07:04.639> is<00:07:04.880> that<00:07:05.120> Deep<00:07:05.440> Seek, 00:07:05.990 --> 00:07:06.000 align:start position:0% thing you'll notice is that Deep Seek, 00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:09.189 align:start position:0% thing you'll notice is that Deep Seek, remember<00:07:06.560> this<00:07:06.800> model<00:07:07.120> costs<00:07:07.520> 43.5<00:07:08.639> cents<00:07:08.960> per 00:07:09.189 --> 00:07:09.199 align:start position:0% remember this model costs 43.5 cents per 00:07:09.199 --> 00:07:12.070 align:start position:0% remember this model costs 43.5 cents per million<00:07:09.520> input<00:07:09.919> tokens<00:07:10.560> and<00:07:10.880> 87<00:07:11.520> cents<00:07:11.840> per 00:07:12.070 --> 00:07:12.080 align:start position:0% million input tokens and 87 cents per 00:07:12.080 --> 00:07:13.909 align:start position:0% million input tokens and 87 cents per million<00:07:12.319> output<00:07:12.720> tokens.<00:07:13.440> While<00:07:13.599> the<00:07:13.759> other 00:07:13.909 --> 00:07:13.919 align:start position:0% million output tokens. While the other 00:07:13.919 --> 00:07:15.670 align:start position:0% million output tokens. While the other models<00:07:14.319> all<00:07:14.560> over<00:07:14.800> here<00:07:14.960> are<00:07:15.280> way<00:07:15.440> more 00:07:15.670 --> 00:07:15.680 align:start position:0% models all over here are way more 00:07:15.680 --> 00:07:17.430 align:start position:0% models all over here are way more expensive<00:07:16.160> than<00:07:16.319> that.<00:07:16.800> So<00:07:16.960> the<00:07:17.199> first<00:07:17.280> thing 00:07:17.430 --> 00:07:17.440 align:start position:0% expensive than that. So the first thing 00:07:17.440 --> 00:07:19.990 align:start position:0% expensive than that. So the first thing if<00:07:17.599> you<00:07:17.759> look<00:07:17.840> at<00:07:18.000> terminal<00:07:18.479> bench<00:07:18.880> 2.1<00:07:19.759> the 00:07:19.990 --> 00:07:20.000 align:start position:0% if you look at terminal bench 2.1 the 00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:22.309 align:start position:0% if you look at terminal bench 2.1 the model<00:07:20.319> scores<00:07:20.800> 87.9. 00:07:22.309 --> 00:07:22.319 align:start position:0% model scores 87.9. 00:07:22.319 --> 00:07:24.950 align:start position:0% model scores 87.9. The<00:07:22.560> older<00:07:22.880> version<00:07:23.039> of<00:07:23.199> the<00:07:23.360> model<00:07:23.599> was<00:07:23.840> 72.1 00:07:24.950 --> 00:07:24.960 align:start position:0% The older version of the model was 72.1 00:07:24.960 --> 00:07:27.110 align:start position:0% The older version of the model was 72.1 and<00:07:25.199> the<00:07:25.360> flash<00:07:25.759> version<00:07:26.080> which<00:07:26.319> we<00:07:26.560> got<00:07:26.800> last 00:07:27.110 --> 00:07:27.120 align:start position:0% and the flash version which we got last 00:07:27.120 --> 00:07:30.309 align:start position:0% and the flash version which we got last week<00:07:27.440> was<00:07:27.759> 82.7.<00:07:29.199> And<00:07:29.360> what's<00:07:29.599> crazy<00:07:29.919> is<00:07:30.080> that 00:07:30.309 --> 00:07:30.319 align:start position:0% week was 82.7. And what's crazy is that 00:07:30.319 --> 00:07:33.990 align:start position:0% week was 82.7. And what's crazy is that Fable<00:07:30.800> 5<00:07:31.120> is<00:07:31.440> 88.<00:07:32.160> Yes,<00:07:32.560> 88.<00:07:33.199> So<00:07:33.440> this<00:07:33.599> model<00:07:33.840> is 00:07:33.990 --> 00:07:34.000 align:start position:0% Fable 5 is 88. Yes, 88. So this model is 00:07:34.000 --> 00:07:37.350 align:start position:0% Fable 5 is 88. Yes, 88. So this model is only.1%<00:07:35.199> behind<00:07:35.680> Fable<00:07:36.160> 5.<00:07:36.720> And<00:07:36.880> then<00:07:37.039> on<00:07:37.199> the 00:07:37.350 --> 00:07:37.360 align:start position:0% only.1% behind Fable 5. And then on the 00:07:37.360 --> 00:07:39.510 align:start position:0% only.1% behind Fable 5. And then on the Cyber<00:07:37.680> Gym,<00:07:37.919> which<00:07:38.080> is<00:07:38.160> Cyber<00:07:38.560> Security,<00:07:39.280> the 00:07:39.510 --> 00:07:39.520 align:start position:0% Cyber Gym, which is Cyber Security, the 00:07:39.520 --> 00:07:42.230 align:start position:0% Cyber Gym, which is Cyber Security, the model<00:07:39.840> actually<00:07:40.319> beats<00:07:40.639> Fable<00:07:41.120> 5.<00:07:41.599> Fable<00:07:42.080> 5 00:07:42.230 --> 00:07:42.240 align:start position:0% model actually beats Fable 5. Fable 5 00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:45.270 align:start position:0% model actually beats Fable 5. Fable 5 sits<00:07:42.479> at<00:07:42.720> 83.1<00:07:43.919> while<00:07:44.160> Deepseek<00:07:44.720> version<00:07:45.039> 4 00:07:45.270 --> 00:07:45.280 align:start position:0% sits at 83.1 while Deepseek version 4 00:07:45.280 --> 00:07:47.029 align:start position:0% sits at 83.1 while Deepseek version 4 Pro,<00:07:45.520> the<00:07:45.680> new<00:07:45.840> one<00:07:45.919> that<00:07:46.080> we<00:07:46.240> got<00:07:46.400> today,<00:07:46.880> is 00:07:47.029 --> 00:07:47.039 align:start position:0% Pro, the new one that we got today, is 00:07:47.039 --> 00:07:49.670 align:start position:0% Pro, the new one that we got today, is at<00:07:47.280> 83.3.<00:07:48.720> Now,<00:07:48.880> if<00:07:49.039> this<00:07:49.280> tells<00:07:49.520> you 00:07:49.670 --> 00:07:49.680 align:start position:0% at 83.3. Now, if this tells you 00:07:49.680 --> 00:07:51.670 align:start position:0% at 83.3. Now, if this tells you something<00:07:50.000> is<00:07:50.240> that<00:07:50.560> this<00:07:50.880> model<00:07:51.199> is<00:07:51.440> once 00:07:51.670 --> 00:07:51.680 align:start position:0% something is that this model is once 00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:53.749 align:start position:0% something is that this model is once again<00:07:51.919> really<00:07:52.240> geared<00:07:52.560> at<00:07:52.720> cyber<00:07:53.039> security. 00:07:53.749 --> 00:07:53.759 align:start position:0% again really geared at cyber security. 00:07:53.759 --> 00:07:55.589 align:start position:0% again really geared at cyber security. We<00:07:53.919> saw<00:07:54.080> the<00:07:54.240> Flash<00:07:54.560> model<00:07:54.879> also<00:07:55.120> be<00:07:55.280> geared 00:07:55.589 --> 00:07:55.599 align:start position:0% We saw the Flash model also be geared 00:07:55.599 --> 00:07:57.270 align:start position:0% We saw the Flash model also be geared towards<00:07:55.840> cyber<00:07:56.240> security<00:07:56.560> and<00:07:56.800> becoming<00:07:57.120> a 00:07:57.270 --> 00:07:57.280 align:start position:0% towards cyber security and becoming a 00:07:57.280 --> 00:07:58.790 align:start position:0% towards cyber security and becoming a model<00:07:57.440> that<00:07:57.680> was<00:07:57.840> quite<00:07:58.080> capable<00:07:58.400> in<00:07:58.639> that 00:07:58.790 --> 00:07:58.800 align:start position:0% model that was quite capable in that 00:07:58.800 --> 00:08:00.550 align:start position:0% model that was quite capable in that area.<00:07:59.360> And<00:07:59.520> we're<00:07:59.759> seeing<00:08:00.000> the<00:08:00.160> same<00:08:00.400> thing 00:08:00.550 --> 00:08:00.560 align:start position:0% area. And we're seeing the same thing 00:08:00.560 --> 00:08:02.710 align:start position:0% area. And we're seeing the same thing today<00:08:01.120> with<00:08:01.360> the<00:08:01.520> new<00:08:01.680> version<00:08:02.000> 4<00:08:02.240> Pro<00:08:02.479> which 00:08:02.710 --> 00:08:02.720 align:start position:0% today with the new version 4 Pro which 00:08:02.720 --> 00:08:05.830 align:start position:0% today with the new version 4 Pro which sits<00:08:02.879> at<00:08:03.120> 83.3<00:08:04.319> outperforming<00:08:05.039> Fable<00:08:05.440> 5<00:08:05.680> on 00:08:05.830 --> 00:08:05.840 align:start position:0% sits at 83.3 outperforming Fable 5 on 00:08:05.840 --> 00:08:07.670 align:start position:0% sits at 83.3 outperforming Fable 5 on the<00:08:06.000> benchmark.<00:08:06.800> On<00:08:07.039> deep<00:08:07.360> software 00:08:07.670 --> 00:08:07.680 align:start position:0% the benchmark. On deep software 00:08:07.680 --> 00:08:09.909 align:start position:0% the benchmark. On deep software engineering,<00:08:08.400> this<00:08:08.639> model<00:08:08.879> is<00:08:09.120> not<00:08:09.360> beating 00:08:09.909 --> 00:08:09.919 align:start position:0% engineering, this model is not beating 00:08:09.919 --> 00:08:12.629 align:start position:0% engineering, this model is not beating Fable<00:08:10.319> 5<00:08:10.560> because<00:08:10.800> Fable<00:08:11.199> 5<00:08:11.440> sits<00:08:11.680> at<00:08:11.919> 70,<00:08:12.400> but 00:08:12.629 --> 00:08:12.639 align:start position:0% Fable 5 because Fable 5 sits at 70, but 00:08:12.639 --> 00:08:15.430 align:start position:0% Fable 5 because Fable 5 sits at 70, but the<00:08:12.800> model<00:08:13.039> achieves<00:08:13.520> 62.7<00:08:14.879> which<00:08:15.039> is<00:08:15.199> ahead 00:08:15.430 --> 00:08:15.440 align:start position:0% the model achieves 62.7 which is ahead 00:08:15.440 --> 00:08:18.629 align:start position:0% the model achieves 62.7 which is ahead of<00:08:15.599> GLM<00:08:16.080> 5.2<00:08:16.960> and<00:08:17.199> a<00:08:17.360> bit<00:08:17.520> behind<00:08:17.840> Kimmy<00:08:18.240> K3 00:08:18.629 --> 00:08:18.639 align:start position:0% of GLM 5.2 and a bit behind Kimmy K3 00:08:18.639 --> 00:08:20.869 align:start position:0% of GLM 5.2 and a bit behind Kimmy K3 which<00:08:18.879> sits<00:08:19.039> at<00:08:19.360> 67.5. 00:08:20.869 --> 00:08:20.879 align:start position:0% which sits at 67.5. 00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:22.869 align:start position:0% which sits at 67.5. But<00:08:21.039> one<00:08:21.280> thing<00:08:21.440> again,<00:08:21.840> this<00:08:22.080> is<00:08:22.160> a<00:08:22.400> big<00:08:22.560> jump 00:08:22.869 --> 00:08:22.879 align:start position:0% But one thing again, this is a big jump 00:08:22.879 --> 00:08:24.550 align:start position:0% But one thing again, this is a big jump compared<00:08:23.199> to<00:08:23.440> the<00:08:23.680> preview<00:08:24.000> version<00:08:24.240> of<00:08:24.400> the 00:08:24.550 --> 00:08:24.560 align:start position:0% compared to the preview version of the 00:08:24.560 --> 00:08:27.350 align:start position:0% compared to the preview version of the model<00:08:25.039> which<00:08:25.280> was<00:08:25.440> at<00:08:25.680> 12.8.<00:08:26.639> So<00:08:26.879> yeah,<00:08:27.120> they 00:08:27.350 --> 00:08:27.360 align:start position:0% model which was at 12.8. So yeah, they 00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:28.950 align:start position:0% model which was at 12.8. So yeah, they have<00:08:27.520> really<00:08:27.759> trained<00:08:28.080> this<00:08:28.319> model<00:08:28.560> and<00:08:28.800> they 00:08:28.950 --> 00:08:28.960 align:start position:0% have really trained this model and they 00:08:28.960 --> 00:08:30.550 align:start position:0% have really trained this model and they have<00:08:29.120> improved<00:08:29.520> it<00:08:29.599> on<00:08:29.759> the<00:08:29.919> back<00:08:30.080> end<00:08:30.319> because 00:08:30.550 --> 00:08:30.560 align:start position:0% have improved it on the back end because 00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:32.870 align:start position:0% have improved it on the back end because we<00:08:30.879> can<00:08:30.960> clearly<00:08:31.440> see<00:08:31.759> in<00:08:32.000> this<00:08:32.240> deep<00:08:32.479> software 00:08:32.870 --> 00:08:32.880 align:start position:0% we can clearly see in this deep software 00:08:32.880 --> 00:08:34.870 align:start position:0% we can clearly see in this deep software engineering<00:08:33.360> benchmark.<00:08:34.320> And<00:08:34.560> there's<00:08:34.719> a 00:08:34.870 --> 00:08:34.880 align:start position:0% engineering benchmark. And there's a 00:08:34.880 --> 00:08:36.709 align:start position:0% engineering benchmark. And there's a couple<00:08:35.039> of<00:08:35.200> other<00:08:35.360> benchmarks,<00:08:35.919> but<00:08:36.240> one<00:08:36.479> key 00:08:36.709 --> 00:08:36.719 align:start position:0% couple of other benchmarks, but one key 00:08:36.719 --> 00:08:39.110 align:start position:0% couple of other benchmarks, but one key benchmark<00:08:37.120> that<00:08:37.360> this<00:08:37.680> model<00:08:38.080> excels<00:08:38.479> at<00:08:38.880> is 00:08:39.110 --> 00:08:39.120 align:start position:0% benchmark that this model excels at is 00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:41.269 align:start position:0% benchmark that this model excels at is the<00:08:39.440> automation<00:08:40.000> bench<00:08:40.560> where<00:08:40.800> the<00:08:41.039> model 00:08:41.269 --> 00:08:41.279 align:start position:0% the automation bench where the model 00:08:41.279 --> 00:08:45.750 align:start position:0% the automation bench where the model achieves<00:08:41.760> 31.8<00:08:43.039> and<00:08:43.279> Fable<00:08:43.680> 5<00:08:44.159> 29.1.<00:08:45.279> So<00:08:45.440> once 00:08:45.750 --> 00:08:45.760 align:start position:0% achieves 31.8 and Fable 5 29.1. So once 00:08:45.760 --> 00:08:47.990 align:start position:0% achieves 31.8 and Fable 5 29.1. So once again,<00:08:45.920> the<00:08:46.160> model<00:08:46.399> outperforms<00:08:47.040> Fable<00:08:47.519> 5. 00:08:47.990 --> 00:08:48.000 align:start position:0% again, the model outperforms Fable 5. 00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:49.910 align:start position:0% again, the model outperforms Fable 5. Now<00:08:48.240> this<00:08:48.399> is<00:08:48.560> a<00:08:48.720> fraction<00:08:48.959> of<00:08:49.120> the<00:08:49.279> cost<00:08:49.519> as<00:08:49.760> I 00:08:49.910 --> 00:08:49.920 align:start position:0% Now this is a fraction of the cost as I 00:08:49.920 --> 00:08:52.470 align:start position:0% Now this is a fraction of the cost as I mentioned.<00:08:50.240> This<00:08:50.399> is<00:08:50.560> 43<00:08:50.959> cents<00:08:51.200> and<00:08:51.519> 87<00:08:52.240> for 00:08:52.470 --> 00:08:52.480 align:start position:0% mentioned. This is 43 cents and 87 for 00:08:52.480 --> 00:08:54.630 align:start position:0% mentioned. This is 43 cents and 87 for input<00:08:52.800> and<00:08:53.040> output<00:08:53.440> respectively<00:08:54.240> versus 00:08:54.630 --> 00:08:54.640 align:start position:0% input and output respectively versus 00:08:54.640 --> 00:08:57.509 align:start position:0% input and output respectively versus Fable<00:08:55.040> 5<00:08:55.279> which<00:08:55.519> is<00:08:55.680> at<00:08:56.000> $10.50. 00:08:57.509 --> 00:08:57.519 align:start position:0% Fable 5 which is at $10.50. 00:08:57.519 --> 00:08:59.269 align:start position:0% Fable 5 which is at $10.50. So<00:08:57.680> yes,<00:08:57.920> if<00:08:58.080> we<00:08:58.160> look<00:08:58.240> at<00:08:58.399> the<00:08:58.560> terminal<00:08:58.880> bench 00:08:59.269 --> 00:08:59.279 align:start position:0% So yes, if we look at the terminal bench 00:08:59.279 --> 00:09:01.269 align:start position:0% So yes, if we look at the terminal bench for<00:08:59.360> example,<00:09:00.160> we<00:09:00.399> are<00:09:00.560> seeing<00:09:00.800> this<00:09:00.959> model 00:09:01.269 --> 00:09:01.279 align:start position:0% for example, we are seeing this model 00:09:01.279 --> 00:09:03.590 align:start position:0% for example, we are seeing this model achieve<00:09:01.600> a<00:09:01.839> result<00:09:02.160> which<00:09:02.399> is<00:09:02.640> 0.1<00:09:03.120> behind<00:09:03.440> the 00:09:03.590 --> 00:09:03.600 align:start position:0% achieve a result which is 0.1 behind the 00:09:03.600 --> 00:09:06.150 align:start position:0% achieve a result which is 0.1 behind the best<00:09:03.839> model<00:09:04.240> out<00:09:04.399> there<00:09:04.640> Fable<00:09:05.040> 5<00:09:05.680> and<00:09:05.920> the 00:09:06.150 --> 00:09:06.160 align:start position:0% best model out there Fable 5 and the 00:09:06.160 --> 00:09:09.509 align:start position:0% best model out there Fable 5 and the pricing<00:09:06.560> is<00:09:06.880> insane<00:09:07.279> to<00:09:07.440> look<00:09:07.600> at<00:09:08.160> $43<00:09:09.040> versus 00:09:09.509 --> 00:09:09.519 align:start position:0% pricing is insane to look at $43 versus 00:09:09.519 --> 00:09:13.509 align:start position:0% pricing is insane to look at $43 versus $10<00:09:10.480> 87<00:09:11.279> versus<00:09:11.839> $50<00:09:12.640> per<00:09:12.880> million<00:09:13.120> input 00:09:13.509 --> 00:09:13.519 align:start position:0% $10 87 versus $50 per million input 00:09:13.519 --> 00:09:15.350 align:start position:0% $10 87 versus $50 per million input tokens.<00:09:14.080> So<00:09:14.240> when<00:09:14.480> we<00:09:14.560> turn<00:09:14.800> that<00:09:14.959> into<00:09:15.200> a 00:09:15.350 --> 00:09:15.360 align:start position:0% tokens. So when we turn that into a 00:09:15.360 --> 00:09:18.150 align:start position:0% tokens. So when we turn that into a fraction,<00:09:16.160> this<00:09:16.399> model<00:09:16.720> is<00:09:17.040> 57<00:09:17.760> times 00:09:18.150 --> 00:09:18.160 align:start position:0% fraction, this model is 57 times 00:09:18.160 --> 00:09:20.389 align:start position:0% fraction, this model is 57 times cheaper.<00:09:18.959> And<00:09:19.200> earlier<00:09:19.600> last<00:09:19.920> week,<00:09:20.080> I<00:09:20.240> think 00:09:20.389 --> 00:09:20.399 align:start position:0% cheaper. And earlier last week, I think 00:09:20.399 --> 00:09:22.150 align:start position:0% cheaper. And earlier last week, I think I<00:09:20.560> made<00:09:20.720> a<00:09:20.880> video<00:09:21.040> about<00:09:21.279> how<00:09:21.600> DeepSeek 00:09:22.150 --> 00:09:22.160 align:start position:0% I made a video about how DeepSeek 00:09:22.160 --> 00:09:24.470 align:start position:0% I made a video about how DeepSeek version<00:09:22.480> 4<00:09:22.720> Pro<00:09:23.279> was<00:09:23.600> going<00:09:23.760> to<00:09:23.920> achieve<00:09:24.240> a 00:09:24.470 --> 00:09:24.480 align:start position:0% version 4 Pro was going to achieve a 00:09:24.480 --> 00:09:25.829 align:start position:0% version 4 Pro was going to achieve a result<00:09:24.720> like<00:09:24.959> this<00:09:25.200> because<00:09:25.440> there<00:09:25.600> was<00:09:25.680> a 00:09:25.829 --> 00:09:25.839 align:start position:0% result like this because there was a 00:09:25.839 --> 00:09:27.829 align:start position:0% result like this because there was a investor<00:09:26.399> report<00:09:26.640> that<00:09:26.880> leaked.<00:09:27.360> And<00:09:27.519> when<00:09:27.680> I 00:09:27.829 --> 00:09:27.839 align:start position:0% investor report that leaked. And when I 00:09:27.839 --> 00:09:29.430 align:start position:0% investor report that leaked. And when I saw<00:09:28.000> the<00:09:28.160> pricing<00:09:28.560> where<00:09:28.720> it<00:09:28.959> said<00:09:29.040> that<00:09:29.200> it 00:09:29.430 --> 00:09:29.440 align:start position:0% saw the pricing where it said that it 00:09:29.440 --> 00:09:30.949 align:start position:0% saw the pricing where it said that it was<00:09:29.519> going<00:09:29.600> to<00:09:29.760> match<00:09:30.000> Fable<00:09:30.399> 5<00:09:30.560> or<00:09:30.800> even 00:09:30.949 --> 00:09:30.959 align:start position:0% was going to match Fable 5 or even 00:09:30.959 --> 00:09:33.750 align:start position:0% was going to match Fable 5 or even outperform<00:09:31.519> it<00:09:31.920> and<00:09:32.160> be<00:09:32.320> at<00:09:32.640> 57<00:09:33.120> times<00:09:33.440> cheaper 00:09:33.750 --> 00:09:33.760 align:start position:0% outperform it and be at 57 times cheaper 00:09:33.760 --> 00:09:35.430 align:start position:0% outperform it and be at 57 times cheaper per<00:09:34.000> cost.<00:09:34.640> When<00:09:34.800> I<00:09:34.959> was<00:09:35.040> reading<00:09:35.200> the 00:09:35.430 --> 00:09:35.440 align:start position:0% per cost. When I was reading the 00:09:35.440 --> 00:09:37.110 align:start position:0% per cost. When I was reading the investor<00:09:35.920> report,<00:09:36.320> I<00:09:36.480> didn't<00:09:36.640> really<00:09:36.880> believe 00:09:37.110 --> 00:09:37.120 align:start position:0% investor report, I didn't really believe 00:09:37.120 --> 00:09:39.030 align:start position:0% investor report, I didn't really believe it.<00:09:37.680> But<00:09:37.839> today,<00:09:38.080> it<00:09:38.240> is<00:09:38.399> proven<00:09:38.720> because<00:09:39.040> at 00:09:39.030 --> 00:09:39.040 align:start position:0% it. But today, it is proven because at 00:09:39.040 --> 00:09:41.030 align:start position:0% it. But today, it is proven because at least<00:09:39.360> on<00:09:39.519> the<00:09:39.680> benchmark<00:09:40.160> so<00:09:40.320> far,<00:09:40.640> yes,<00:09:40.800> I'm 00:09:41.030 --> 00:09:41.040 align:start position:0% least on the benchmark so far, yes, I'm 00:09:41.040 --> 00:09:42.870 align:start position:0% least on the benchmark so far, yes, I'm just<00:09:41.120> saying<00:09:41.360> the<00:09:41.519> benchmarks,<00:09:42.480> we<00:09:42.720> are 00:09:42.870 --> 00:09:42.880 align:start position:0% just saying the benchmarks, we are 00:09:42.880 --> 00:09:45.030 align:start position:0% just saying the benchmarks, we are seeing<00:09:43.200> similar<00:09:43.680> level<00:09:44.000> performance.<00:09:44.800> Now, 00:09:45.030 --> 00:09:45.040 align:start position:0% seeing similar level performance. Now, 00:09:45.040 --> 00:09:46.949 align:start position:0% seeing similar level performance. Now, if<00:09:45.279> this<00:09:45.519> model<00:09:45.839> actually<00:09:46.240> performs<00:09:46.720> like 00:09:46.949 --> 00:09:46.959 align:start position:0% if this model actually performs like 00:09:46.959 --> 00:09:48.949 align:start position:0% if this model actually performs like that<00:09:47.200> in<00:09:47.440> production,<00:09:48.160> it's<00:09:48.399> a<00:09:48.560> little<00:09:48.720> too 00:09:48.949 --> 00:09:48.959 align:start position:0% that in production, it's a little too 00:09:48.959 --> 00:09:50.710 align:start position:0% that in production, it's a little too early<00:09:49.200> to<00:09:49.440> tell<00:09:49.680> yet.<00:09:50.000> We<00:09:50.160> still<00:09:50.320> would<00:09:50.560> have 00:09:50.710 --> 00:09:50.720 align:start position:0% early to tell yet. We still would have 00:09:50.720 --> 00:09:52.389 align:start position:0% early to tell yet. We still would have to<00:09:50.800> give<00:09:50.959> it<00:09:51.040> a<00:09:51.200> couple<00:09:51.360> of<00:09:51.519> weeks<00:09:51.760> and<00:09:52.000> see<00:09:52.160> how 00:09:52.389 --> 00:09:52.399 align:start position:0% to give it a couple of weeks and see how 00:09:52.399 --> 00:09:54.389 align:start position:0% to give it a couple of weeks and see how it's<00:09:52.640> performing<00:09:53.040> in<00:09:53.279> the<00:09:53.440> long<00:09:53.600> run<00:09:54.080> because 00:09:54.389 --> 00:09:54.399 align:start position:0% it's performing in the long run because 00:09:54.399 --> 00:09:56.389 align:start position:0% it's performing in the long run because sometimes<00:09:54.800> on<00:09:54.959> the<00:09:55.120> release<00:09:55.440> day<00:09:55.760> the<00:09:56.000> models 00:09:56.389 --> 00:09:56.399 align:start position:0% sometimes on the release day the models 00:09:56.399 --> 00:09:58.470 align:start position:0% sometimes on the release day the models perform<00:09:56.880> quite<00:09:57.200> good,<00:09:57.600> but<00:09:57.839> over<00:09:58.080> time<00:09:58.240> they 00:09:58.470 --> 00:09:58.480 align:start position:0% perform quite good, but over time they 00:09:58.480 --> 00:10:00.230 align:start position:0% perform quite good, but over time they kind<00:09:58.640> of<00:09:58.720> deteriorate<00:09:59.200> in<00:09:59.440> their<00:09:59.680> quality. 00:10:00.230 --> 00:10:00.240 align:start position:0% kind of deteriorate in their quality. 00:10:00.240 --> 00:10:01.990 align:start position:0% kind of deteriorate in their quality. So,<00:10:00.399> we<00:10:00.560> hope<00:10:00.800> DeepS<00:10:01.360> doesn't<00:10:01.519> do<00:10:01.680> that. 00:10:01.990 --> 00:10:02.000 align:start position:0% So, we hope DeepS doesn't do that. 00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:03.670 align:start position:0% So, we hope DeepS doesn't do that. Historically,<00:10:02.560> they<00:10:02.800> haven't<00:10:03.120> done<00:10:03.279> that, 00:10:03.670 --> 00:10:03.680 align:start position:0% Historically, they haven't done that, 00:10:03.680 --> 00:10:05.590 align:start position:0% Historically, they haven't done that, but<00:10:03.920> let's<00:10:04.160> just<00:10:04.320> see.<00:10:04.720> Just<00:10:04.959> going<00:10:05.200> to<00:10:05.279> put<00:10:05.440> it 00:10:05.590 --> 00:10:05.600 align:start position:0% but let's just see. Just going to put it 00:10:05.600 --> 00:10:07.110 align:start position:0% but let's just see. Just going to put it out<00:10:05.760> there<00:10:06.000> because<00:10:06.240> right<00:10:06.480> now<00:10:06.640> we're<00:10:06.800> basing 00:10:07.110 --> 00:10:07.120 align:start position:0% out there because right now we're basing 00:10:07.120 --> 00:10:09.750 align:start position:0% out there because right now we're basing this<00:10:07.360> off<00:10:07.600> of<00:10:07.760> benchmarks.<00:10:09.200> But<00:10:09.360> that's<00:10:09.600> it 00:10:09.750 --> 00:10:09.760 align:start position:0% this off of benchmarks. But that's it 00:10:09.760 --> 00:10:11.509 align:start position:0% this off of benchmarks. But that's it for<00:10:10.000> today's<00:10:10.320> video.<00:10:10.880> Make<00:10:11.120> sure<00:10:11.200> you<00:10:11.360> guys 00:10:11.509 --> 00:10:11.519 align:start position:0% for today's video. Make sure you guys 00:10:11.519 --> 00:10:13.509 align:start position:0% for today's video. Make sure you guys are<00:10:11.760> subscribed<00:10:12.080> to<00:10:12.240> the<00:10:12.480> channel.<00:10:13.120> Follow 00:10:13.509 --> 00:10:13.519 align:start position:0% are subscribed to the channel. Follow 00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:15.110 align:start position:0% are subscribed to the channel. Follow our<00:10:13.760> new<00:10:13.920> newsletter<00:10:14.480> as<00:10:14.720> well<00:10:14.880> at 00:10:15.110 --> 00:10:15.120 align:start position:0% our new newsletter as well at 00:10:15.120 --> 00:10:17.350 align:start position:0% our new newsletter as well at universeofai.behive.com 00:10:17.350 --> 00:10:17.360 align:start position:0% universeofai.behive.com 00:10:17.360 --> 00:10:19.030 align:start position:0% universeofai.behive.com as<00:10:17.600> well<00:10:17.680> as<00:10:17.839> subscribe<00:10:18.160> to<00:10:18.320> the<00:10:18.480> main<00:10:18.720> channel 00:10:19.030 --> 00:10:19.040 align:start position:0% as well as subscribe to the main channel 00:10:19.040 --> 00:10:21.509 align:start position:0% as well as subscribe to the main channel World<00:10:19.279> of<00:10:19.440> AI<00:10:20.079> and<00:10:20.320> support<00:10:20.640> us<00:10:20.800> on<00:10:21.040> X<00:10:21.360> by 00:10:21.509 --> 00:10:21.519 align:start position:0% World of AI and support us on X by 00:10:21.519 --> 00:10:23.750 align:start position:0% World of AI and support us on X by following<00:10:21.760> the<00:10:22.000> Universe<00:10:22.320> of<00:10:22.480> AIZ<00:10:23.120> as<00:10:23.279> well. 00:10:23.750 --> 00:10:23.760 align:start position:0% following the Universe of AIZ as well. 00:10:23.760 --> 00:10:25.350 align:start position:0% following the Universe of AIZ as well. Until<00:10:24.079> then,<00:10:24.399> I'll<00:10:24.560> see<00:10:24.720> you<00:10:24.880> guys<00:10:25.040> in<00:10:25.200> the 00:10:25.350 --> 00:10:25.360 align:start position:0% Until then, I'll see you guys in the 00:10:25.360 --> 00:10:27.519 align:start position:0% Until then, I'll see you guys in the next