0:00.800–0:03.439
So, the DSA is eyeing another win today.
0:03.439–0:05.506
This time in Wisconsin's governor's
0:05.506–0:09.519
race, but AOC isn't backing Francesca
0:09.519–0:10.950
Hong.
0:10.950–0:11.450
Hong.
0:11.450–0:13.450
>> Francesca Hong has made clear her
0:13.450–0:15.317
present stances to her election.
0:15.317–0:17.383
>> Yeah, she's moved away from a lot of
0:17.383–0:19.583
>> Right. She's moved away from it. And I
0:19.583–0:21.680
have a local city councilman that has
0:21.680–0:25.439
this uh uh saying, "Woke one was crazy."
0:25.439–0:27.706
>> Did the movement go too far with some of
0:27.706–0:29.906
those positions? I mean you you briefly
0:29.906–0:31.906
supported the idea of defunding the
0:31.906–0:32.406
police.
0:32.406–0:32.906
police.
0:32.906–0:35.440
>> I think that you know during lockdown
0:35.440–0:37.507
of course rhetoric in that time is not
0:37.507–0:40.879
rhetoric that we would use today.
0:40.879–0:42.546
Joining us now is New York Post
0:42.546–0:44.879
columnist Carol Marowitz in studio. It's
0:44.879–0:47.840
so great to see you. Um you know woke
0:47.840–0:50.800
one was crazy. That that was a turning
0:50.800–0:51.867
point right there.
0:51.867–0:53.933
>> Yeah. It's like woke has never been
0:53.933–0:56.200
tried. Like they say comm real communism
0:56.200–0:58.200
has never been tried. I think that's
0:58.200–1:00.400
what AOC is trying here. Has she changed
1:00.400–1:02.467
on defunding the police? She's never
1:02.467–1:04.467
talked about it. She's never talked
1:04.467–1:06.667
about her change in policy or her change
1:06.667–1:08.667
in thinking. I think she's still the
1:08.667–1:10.733
same communist she's been all along.
1:10.733–1:12.800
same communist she's been all along.
1:12.800–1:14.667
They've just learn to massage it a
1:14.667–1:17.000
>> Yeah. Do you think that she's sending Do
1:17.000–1:19.000
you think this is a signal that she's
1:19.000–1:20.867
about to sell out the DSA and these
1:20.867–1:22.933
people who are so enthusiastic about
1:22.933–1:24.933
her, or is she just flat out lying and
1:24.933–1:26.933
it's just something she's saying? I
1:26.933–1:29.133
think she's looking for higher office,
1:29.133–1:31.133
so she'll do whatever it takes to get
1:31.133–1:33.333
there. You could see her moderating the
1:33.333–1:35.200
way she speaks, but again, I think
1:35.200–1:37.267
people need to be really careful that
1:37.267–1:39.533
she hasn't changed her actual policies.
1:39.533–1:41.733
It's only the rhetoric. She talks about
1:41.733–1:43.800
the rhetoric. It's only the rhetoric
1:43.800–1:45.000
that she's changing.
1:45.000–1:47.067
>> And part of the thing that's really
1:47.067–1:49.200
crazy about this and and it's actually
1:49.200–1:51.267
really enraging if you stop and think
1:51.267–1:53.133
about if you go back and you look at
1:53.133–1:55.267
what that rhetoric from Crazy Woke One
1:55.267–1:57.133
that she was spouting at the time.
1:57.133–1:58.933
people during the summer of love
1:58.933–2:01.267
when people's neighborhoods were burned
2:01.267–2:03.333
people lost their local pharmacies,
2:03.333–2:04.933
people lost their lives. The
2:04.933–2:06.733
those woke one was crazy that she
2:06.733–2:08.667
laughs giggles about was very very
2:08.667–2:09.800
damaging to people.
2:09.800–2:11.867
>> That's right. And how about cancel
2:11.867–2:14.133
culture ruining people's lives? She was
2:14.133–2:16.267
at the forefront of that. She wanted to
2:16.267–2:18.267
get rid of prisons. She kept saying,
2:18.267–2:20.467
"No, we really do want to defund police.
2:20.467–2:22.600
This isn't just something we say." All
2:22.600–2:24.667
all the kids that were caught up in the
2:24.667–2:26.867
trans insanity, that's at her feet. And
2:26.867–2:29.000
none of that has changed. If you ask her
2:29.000–2:31.133
her positions today, they won't be any
2:31.133–2:33.133
different than they were a few years
2:33.133–2:35.333
ago. Again, she's just learned a better
2:35.333–2:36.600
way to talk about them.
2:36.600–2:38.467
Yeah. She's smelled power and she
2:38.467–2:40.533
thinks she's going to go the distance
2:40.533–2:42.667
and she's going to now say whatever she
2:42.667–2:44.200
has to do in order to get full
2:44.200–2:46.400
control of that power. That's right. As
2:46.400–2:48.333
always, so great to see you, Karol.
2:48.333–2:50.533
>> So good to see you, Charlie. Be sure to
2:50.533–2:52.000
like and subscribe for all the Fox News

0:00.800–0:03.439
所以，DSA 今天正瞄準另一場勝利。
0:03.439–0:05.506
這次是在威斯康辛州州長
0:05.506–0:09.519
選舉中，但 AOC 並不支持 Francesca
0:09.519–0:10.950
洪。
0:10.950–0:11.450
洪。
0:11.450–0:13.450
>> Francesca Hong 已清楚表明她
0:13.450–0:15.317
對其選舉的立場。
0:15.317–0:17.383
>> 是的，她已遠離許多
0:17.383–0:19.583
>> 沒錯。她已遠離那些立場。而且我
0:19.583–0:21.680
有一位當地市議員持有
0:21.680–0:25.439
這種說法，「woke one 是瘋狂的。」
0:25.439–0:27.706
>> 運動在部分議題上是否過度了？
0:27.706–0:29.906
立場上是否走得太遠？我的意思是，你曾短暫
0:29.906–0:31.906
支持了撤資的構想
0:31.906–0:32.406
警察預算的想法。
0:32.406–0:32.906
警察預算。
0:32.906–0:35.440
>> 我認為你知道，在封鎖期間
0:35.440–0:37.507
當時的言論當然不是
0:37.507–0:40.879
我們今天會使用的言論。
0:40.879–0:42.546
現在與我們連線的是紐約郵報
0:42.546–0:44.879
專欄作家卡蘿·馬羅維茨在攝影棚。很高興看到你。嗯，你知道「覺醒」
0:44.879–0:47.840
「覺醒」曾經很瘋狂。那是一個轉折
0:47.840–0:50.800
其中一人很瘋狂。那是一個轉捩點
0:50.800–0:51.867
>> 沒錯。這就像「覺醒」從未真正嘗試過一樣。就像他們說的，真正的共產主義從未真正嘗試過。我認為
0:51.867–0:53.933
這是AOC在這裡試圖做的。她改變了
0:53.933–0:56.200
對削減警察預算的立場嗎？她從未談論過。她從未談論
0:56.200–0:58.200
過她的政策改變或思維改變。我認為她仍然是
0:58.200–1:00.400
那個一直以來的共產主義者。
1:00.400–1:02.467
那個一直以來的共產主義者。
1:02.467–1:04.467
他們只是學會了修飾它
1:04.467–1:06.667
>> 沒錯。你認為這是在發送訊號嗎？
1:06.667–1:08.667
你認為這是訊號，表示她
1:08.667–1:10.733
即將出賣DSA以及這些對她
1:10.733–1:12.800
如此熱情的人，或者她只是純粹在撒謊，而
1:12.800–1:14.667
他們只是學會了去修飾它
1:14.667–1:17.000
>> 是的。你認為她正在發送訊號嗎？
1:17.000–1:19.000
你認為這是一個訊號，表示她正
1:19.000–1:20.867
即將把DSA賣光，這些
1:20.867–1:22.933
對她如此熱情的人，還是她根本就在
1:22.933–1:24.933
她是要賣掉DSA還是這些對她如此熱情的人，還是她根本就是在說謊
1:24.933–1:26.933
她只是在說些什麼嗎？我
1:26.933–1:29.133
我認為她在尋求更高的職位，
1:29.133–1:31.133
所以她會不惜一切代價去達成。你可以看到她調整
1:31.133–1:33.333
她的談吐方式，但再次強調，我認為
1:33.333–1:35.200
人們需要非常謹慎，確認
1:35.200–1:37.267
她並沒有改變實際的政策。
1:37.267–1:39.533
只是修辭上的改變。她談論的是
1:39.533–1:41.733
修辭。她改變的只是
1:41.733–1:43.800
在講空話。這只是空話
1:43.800–1:45.000
>> 這其中真正
1:45.000–1:47.067
瘋狂的一部分，實際上
1:47.067–1:49.200
對這事瘋狂，而且實際上
1:49.200–1:51.267
如果你停下來想想
1:51.267–1:53.133
那個瘋狂的「覺醒者」所說出的
1:53.133–1:55.267
瘋狂左派一號的那番話
1:55.267–1:57.133
在「愛的夏天」期間，
1:57.133–1:58.933
當人們的社區被焚燒，
1:58.933–2:01.267
人們失去了當地的藥局，
2:01.267–2:03.333
人們失去了生命。這
2:03.333–2:04.933
有人失去了生命。這
2:04.933–2:06.733
那個「覺醒」的人很瘋狂，她
2:06.733–2:08.667
笑咯咯的，這非常非常
2:08.667–2:09.800
對人們造成傷害。
2:09.800–2:11.867
沒錯。那麼取消呢
2:11.867–2:14.133
文化如何毀掉人們的生活？她
2:14.133–2:16.267
站在最前線。她想要
2:16.267–2:18.267
廢除監獄。她一直說，
2:18.267–2:20.467
「不，我們真的想削減警察預算。
2:20.467–2:22.600
這不只是我們嘴上說說而已。」所有
2:22.600–2:24.667
所有捲入其中的孩子，
2:24.667–2:26.867
那些陷入跨性別狂熱的孩子，都要歸咎於她。而且
2:26.867–2:29.000
情況沒有任何改變。如果你問她
2:29.000–2:31.133
她今天的立場，不會跟幾年前
2:31.133–2:33.133
有任何不同。再說一次，她只是學會了更好的
2:33.133–2:35.333
說法來表達這些觀點。
2:35.333–2:36.600
沒錯。她嗅到了權力，她
2:36.600–2:38.467
認為她會堅持到底，
2:38.467–2:40.533
她現在會說任何她
2:40.533–2:42.667
必須說的話，以便獲得全部
2:42.667–2:44.200
必須做到才能獲得完整
2:44.200–2:46.400
掌控那股權力。沒錯。
2:46.400–2:48.333
一如既往，很高興見到妳，卡蘿。
2:48.333–2:50.533
>> 很高興見到妳，查理。記得在 YouTube 上按讚並訂閱，以獲取福克斯新聞的最新消息，並立即在 Fox Now 上觀看完整節目。
2:50.533–2:52.000
在 YouTube 上按讚並訂閱，以獲取福克斯新聞的最新消息，

0:00.800–0:03.439
So, the DSA is eyeing another win today.
所以，DSA 今天正瞄準另一場勝利。
0:03.439–0:05.506
This time in Wisconsin's governor's
這次是在威斯康辛州州長
0:05.506–0:09.519
race, but AOC isn't backing Francesca
選舉中，但 AOC 並不支持 Francesca
0:09.519–0:10.950
Hong.
洪。
0:10.950–0:11.450
Hong.
洪。
0:11.450–0:13.450
>> Francesca Hong has made clear her
>> Francesca Hong 已清楚表明她
0:13.450–0:15.317
present stances to her election.
對其選舉的立場。
0:15.317–0:17.383
>> Yeah, she's moved away from a lot of
>> 是的，她已遠離許多
0:17.383–0:19.583
>> Right. She's moved away from it. And I
>> 沒錯。她已遠離那些立場。而且我
0:19.583–0:21.680
have a local city councilman that has
有一位當地市議員持有
0:21.680–0:25.439
this uh uh saying, "Woke one was crazy."
這種說法，「woke one 是瘋狂的。」
0:25.439–0:27.706
>> Did the movement go too far with some of
>> 運動在部分議題上是否過度了？
0:27.706–0:29.906
those positions? I mean you you briefly
立場上是否走得太遠？我的意思是，你曾短暫
0:29.906–0:31.906
supported the idea of defunding the
支持了撤資的構想
0:31.906–0:32.406
police.
警察預算的想法。
0:32.406–0:32.906
police.
警察預算。
0:32.906–0:35.440
>> I think that you know during lockdown
>> 我認為你知道，在封鎖期間
0:35.440–0:37.507
of course rhetoric in that time is not
當時的言論當然不是
0:37.507–0:40.879
rhetoric that we would use today.
我們今天會使用的言論。
0:40.879–0:42.546
Joining us now is New York Post
現在與我們連線的是紐約郵報
0:42.546–0:44.879
columnist Carol Marowitz in studio. It's
專欄作家卡蘿·馬羅維茨在攝影棚。很高興看到你。嗯，你知道「覺醒」
0:44.879–0:47.840
so great to see you. Um you know woke
「覺醒」曾經很瘋狂。那是一個轉折
0:47.840–0:50.800
one was crazy. That that was a turning
其中一人很瘋狂。那是一個轉捩點
0:50.800–0:51.867
point right there.
>> 沒錯。這就像「覺醒」從未真正嘗試過一樣。就像他們說的，真正的共產主義從未真正嘗試過。我認為
0:51.867–0:53.933
>> Yeah. It's like woke has never been
這是AOC在這裡試圖做的。她改變了
0:53.933–0:56.200
tried. Like they say comm real communism
對削減警察預算的立場嗎？她從未談論過。她從未談論
0:56.200–0:58.200
has never been tried. I think that's
過她的政策改變或思維改變。我認為她仍然是
0:58.200–1:00.400
what AOC is trying here. Has she changed
那個一直以來的共產主義者。
1:00.400–1:02.467
on defunding the police? She's never
那個一直以來的共產主義者。
1:02.467–1:04.467
talked about it. She's never talked
他們只是學會了修飾它
1:04.467–1:06.667
about her change in policy or her change
>> 沒錯。你認為這是在發送訊號嗎？
1:06.667–1:08.667
in thinking. I think she's still the
你認為這是訊號，表示她
1:08.667–1:10.733
same communist she's been all along.
即將出賣DSA以及這些對她
1:10.733–1:12.800
same communist she's been all along.
如此熱情的人，或者她只是純粹在撒謊，而
1:12.800–1:14.667
They've just learn to massage it a
他們只是學會了去修飾它
1:14.667–1:17.000
>> Yeah. Do you think that she's sending Do
>> 是的。你認為她正在發送訊號嗎？
1:17.000–1:19.000
you think this is a signal that she's
你認為這是一個訊號，表示她正
1:19.000–1:20.867
about to sell out the DSA and these
即將把DSA賣光，這些
1:20.867–1:22.933
people who are so enthusiastic about
對她如此熱情的人，還是她根本就在
1:22.933–1:24.933
her, or is she just flat out lying and
她是要賣掉DSA還是這些對她如此熱情的人，還是她根本就是在說謊
1:24.933–1:26.933
it's just something she's saying? I
她只是在說些什麼嗎？我
1:26.933–1:29.133
think she's looking for higher office,
我認為她在尋求更高的職位，
1:29.133–1:31.133
so she'll do whatever it takes to get
所以她會不惜一切代價去達成。你可以看到她調整
1:31.133–1:33.333
there. You could see her moderating the
她的談吐方式，但再次強調，我認為
1:33.333–1:35.200
way she speaks, but again, I think
人們需要非常謹慎，確認
1:35.200–1:37.267
people need to be really careful that
她並沒有改變實際的政策。
1:37.267–1:39.533
she hasn't changed her actual policies.
只是修辭上的改變。她談論的是
1:39.533–1:41.733
It's only the rhetoric. She talks about
修辭。她改變的只是
1:41.733–1:43.800
the rhetoric. It's only the rhetoric
在講空話。這只是空話
1:43.800–1:45.000
that she's changing.
>> 這其中真正
1:45.000–1:47.067
>> And part of the thing that's really
瘋狂的一部分，實際上
1:47.067–1:49.200
crazy about this and and it's actually
對這事瘋狂，而且實際上
1:49.200–1:51.267
really enraging if you stop and think
如果你停下來想想
1:51.267–1:53.133
about if you go back and you look at
那個瘋狂的「覺醒者」所說出的
1:53.133–1:55.267
what that rhetoric from Crazy Woke One
瘋狂左派一號的那番話
1:55.267–1:57.133
that she was spouting at the time.
在「愛的夏天」期間，
1:57.133–1:58.933
people during the summer of love
當人們的社區被焚燒，
1:58.933–2:01.267
when people's neighborhoods were burned
人們失去了當地的藥局，
2:01.267–2:03.333
people lost their local pharmacies,
人們失去了生命。這
2:03.333–2:04.933
people lost their lives. The
有人失去了生命。這
2:04.933–2:06.733
those woke one was crazy that she
那個「覺醒」的人很瘋狂，她
2:06.733–2:08.667
laughs giggles about was very very
笑咯咯的，這非常非常
2:08.667–2:09.800
damaging to people.
對人們造成傷害。
2:09.800–2:11.867
>> That's right. And how about cancel
沒錯。那麼取消呢
2:11.867–2:14.133
culture ruining people's lives? She was
文化如何毀掉人們的生活？她
2:14.133–2:16.267
at the forefront of that. She wanted to
站在最前線。她想要
2:16.267–2:18.267
get rid of prisons. She kept saying,
廢除監獄。她一直說，
2:18.267–2:20.467
"No, we really do want to defund police.
「不，我們真的想削減警察預算。
2:20.467–2:22.600
This isn't just something we say." All
這不只是我們嘴上說說而已。」所有
2:22.600–2:24.667
all the kids that were caught up in the
所有捲入其中的孩子，
2:24.667–2:26.867
trans insanity, that's at her feet. And
那些陷入跨性別狂熱的孩子，都要歸咎於她。而且
2:26.867–2:29.000
none of that has changed. If you ask her
情況沒有任何改變。如果你問她
2:29.000–2:31.133
her positions today, they won't be any
她今天的立場，不會跟幾年前
2:31.133–2:33.133
different than they were a few years
有任何不同。再說一次，她只是學會了更好的
2:33.133–2:35.333
ago. Again, she's just learned a better
說法來表達這些觀點。
2:35.333–2:36.600
way to talk about them.
沒錯。她嗅到了權力，她
2:36.600–2:38.467
Yeah. She's smelled power and she
認為她會堅持到底，
2:38.467–2:40.533
thinks she's going to go the distance
她現在會說任何她
2:40.533–2:42.667
and she's going to now say whatever she
必須說的話，以便獲得全部
2:42.667–2:44.200
has to do in order to get full
必須做到才能獲得完整
2:44.200–2:46.400
control of that power. That's right. As
掌控那股權力。沒錯。
2:46.400–2:48.333
always, so great to see you, Karol.
一如既往，很高興見到妳，卡蘿。
2:48.333–2:50.533
>> So good to see you, Charlie. Be sure to
>> 很高興見到妳，查理。記得在 YouTube 上按讚並訂閱，以獲取福克斯新聞的最新消息，並立即在 Fox Now 上觀看完整節目。
2:50.533–2:52.000
like and subscribe for all the Fox News
在 YouTube 上按讚並訂閱，以獲取福克斯新聞的最新消息，

影片筆記：'WOKE 1 WAS CRAZY': AOC distances herself from Francesca Hong

一句話總結

Fox News 節目主持人 Charlie 與紐約郵報專欄作家 Carol Marowitz 討論 AOC 在威斯康辛州州長選舉中未支持候選人 Francesca Hong 一事，Marowitz 批評 AOC 僅改變修辭而未改變核心政策立場，並回顧其過去支持「取消警察預算」及「取消文化」的爭議行為。

核心重點

AOC 的選舉策略與立場質疑：AOC 未支持威斯康辛州州長候選人 Francesca Hong，引發關於其政治立場是否轉變的討論。
修辭與政策的區別：Marowitz 認為 AOC 並未改變其核心政策（如共產主義傾向、取消警察預算），僅是學會了更巧妙地表達（改變修辭）以追求更高職位。
過去爭議回顧：節目回顧了 AOC 在「愛之夏」（Summer of Love）期間的言論與態度，包括對社區動盪的輕笑、支持廢除監獄及取消警察預算，並將其與「取消文化」及「跨性別狂熱」聯繫起來。
DSA 的支持者關係：質疑 AOC 為了政治晉升，正在「出賣」民主社會主義者協會（DSA）的支持者。

詳細大綱

1. 威斯康辛州選舉動態

背景：民主社會主義者協會（DSA）試圖在威斯康辛州州長選舉中獲勝。
候選人：Francesca Hong 是該選舉的候選人。
AOC 的態度：AOC 未公開支持 Francesca Hong。
當地評價：提及當地市議員對 Francesca Hong 的評價為「Woke one was crazy」（激進派瘋了）。

2. 對 AOC 政策立場的深入質疑

主持人提問：Charlie 詢問 AOC 是否曾支持「取消警察預算」（defund the police）。
Marowitz 的觀點：
AOC 從未公開說明其政策或思維的轉變。
AOC 實際上是同一位「共產主義者」（communist），只是改變了說話方式。
AOC 為了追求更高職位，正在調整言論以迎合大眾，但核心政策立場未變。
AOC 正在試圖「出賣」DSA 的支持者。

3. 回顧 AOC 過去的爭議言論與行為

社會動盪回顧：提及「愛之夏」（Summer of Love）期間的社會動盪，包括社區被焚燒、藥局損失及人員傷亡。
AOC 的反應：批評 AOC 當時對「Woke one was crazy」的輕笑態度具有破壞性。
政策主張回顧：
指責 AOC 是「取消文化」（cancel culture）的領頭羊。
曾主張廢除監獄並堅持取消警察預算。
將「trans insanity」（跨性別狂熱/混亂）歸咎於 AOC 的影響。
結論：AOC 的立場與數年前無異，僅是學會了更好的說話方式以獲取權力。

工具 / 模型 / 名詞整理

AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)：美國眾議員，民主社會主義者協會成員。
DSA (Democratic Socialists of America，民主社會主義者協會)：AOC 所屬的政治組織。
Francesca Hong：威斯康辛州州長候選人。
Carol Marowitz：紐約郵報（New York Post）專欄作家，節目嘉賓。
Charlie：Fox News 節目主持人。
Fox News：播出該節目的電視頻道。
New York Post：紐約郵報，Marowitz 的任職媒體。
YouTube：影片來源平台。
Fox Now：提及的應用程式或平台。
Defund the police：取消警察預算，AOC 過去支持的政策主張。
Cancel culture：取消文化，Marowitz 指責 AOC 為領頭羊。
Summer of Love：節目中用於描述過去某個時期社會動盪的詞彙。
Trans insanity：非標準術語，節目中用於指代與跨性別相關的爭議或混亂。

操作流程整理

節目開場：主持人 Charlie 介紹嘉賓 Carol Marowitz（紐約郵報專欄作家）。
議題引入：討論 AOC 在威斯康辛州州長選舉中未支持 Francesca Hong 的事實。
核心論點闡述：Marowitz 指出 AOC 僅改變修辭（rhetoric），未改變政策立場，並批評其試圖出賣 DSA 支持者。
歷史回顧與批評：

回顧「愛之夏」期間的社會問題（焚燒、傷亡）。
批評 AOC 當時的輕笑態度。
列舉 AOC 過去的政策主張（廢除監獄、取消警察預算）。
將「跨性別狂熱」與 AOC 的影響聯繫起來。

總結：Marowitz 認為 AOC 學會了更巧妙地表達原有立場，以追求更高職位，但本質未變。

值得注意的限制或風險

資訊來源單一性：內容主要基於 Fox News 節目片段及專欄作家 Carol Marowitz 的個人觀點，可能帶有特定政治立場。
術語定義模糊：節目中使用的「Woke one was crazy」、「trans insanity」等詞彙未給出明確定義，依賴聽眾自行解讀或理解其語境含義。
歷史事件指代不明：「Summer of Love」在節目中的具體指代範圍（是歷史事件還是特定時期）未詳細說明，可能引起誤解。

逐字稿辨識疑點

Woke one was crazy：逐字稿中多次出現此短語，語意不明，可能為聽寫錯誤或特定口語縮寫，無法確定其完整原意。
comm real communism：語句不連貫，可能為口誤或聽寫錯誤，無法確定是否指代特定概念。
massage it：在「They've just learn to massage it」中，語意不明，可能為聽寫錯誤（如 mask it 或 phrase it？），但依規則保留原樣。
Summer of love：用於描述過去某個時期，需查證是否為特定歷史事件或節目內的特定指代。
trans insanity：非標準術語，需查證其具體指代內容。
Karol：主持人結尾稱呼專欄作家為「Karol」，但前文介紹為「Carol Marowitz」，可能存在拼寫差異或口誤。

可延伸追問

Francesca Hong 在威斯康辛州州長選舉中的具體政綱為何？
DSA（民主社會主義者協會）在威斯康辛州州長選舉中的具體策略與影響力範圍？
「Woke one was crazy」這一短語在當地政治語境中的具體來源與含義？
AOC 未支持 Francesca Hong 的具體原因是否已公開說明？
「取消警察預算」政策在不同城市實施後的實際社會影響與數據？

生字列表

生字	讀音	中文
eyeing	/ˈaɪ.ɪŋ/	注視、覬覦、瞄準
backing	/ˈbæk.ɪŋ/	支持、聲援
stances	/stænsɪz/	立場、態度
defunding	/diːˈfʌn.dɪŋ/	撤資、削減預算
rhetoric	/ˈret.ər.ɪk/	修辭、言辭
columnist	/ˈkɒl.əm.ɪst/	專欄作家
communist	/ˈkɒm.jə.nɪst/	共產主義者
massage	/ˈmæs.ɑːdʒ/	修飾、潤飾（言論或事實）
signal	/ˈsɪɡ.nəl/	訊號、信號
flat out	/ˈflæt aʊt/	完全地、直截了當地
higher office	/ˈhaɪ.ər ˈɒf.ɪs/	更高職位、高官
moderating	/ˈmɒd.ər.eɪ.tɪŋ/	溫和化、緩和
enraging	/ɪnˈreɪ.dʒɪŋ/	令人憤怒的
spouting	/ˈspaʊ.tɪŋ/	滔滔不絕地說、噴出
damaging	/ˈdæm.ɪ.dʒɪŋ/	有害的、造成損害的
forefront	/ˈfɔːr.fʌnt/	最前線、前沿
insanity	/ɪnˈsæn.ɪ.ti/	瘋狂、精神錯亂
smelled power	/smeld ˈpaʊ.ər/	嗅到權力、察覺權力
go the distance	/ɡəʊ ðə ˈdɪs.təns/	堅持到底、全力以赴

生字解說

eyeing /ˈaɪ.ɪŋ/

· B2

意思：注視、覬覦、瞄準

解說：原意為「注視」，在此語境下帶有積極爭取或覬覦某目標的意味，暗示對勝利的強烈渴望。

影片原句
So, the DSA is eyeing another win today.
所以，DSA 今天正瞄準另一場勝利。

延伸例句
The company is eyeing a merger with a larger competitor.
該公司正覬覦與一家更大的競爭對手合併。

backing /ˈbæk.ɪŋ/

· B1

意思：支持、聲援

解說：指在政治或競爭中給予某人支持，常與 candidate 或 policy 搭配。

影片原句
but AOC isn't backing Francesca Hong.
但 AOC 並不支持 Francesca 洪。

延伸例句
He decided not to back the new proposal due to budget cuts.
由於預算削減，他決定不支持這項新提案。

stances /stænsɪz/

· C1

意思：立場、態度

解說：指對特定議題所持有的正式或公開觀點，通常用於政治或社會討論。

影片原句
Francesca Hong has made clear her present stances to her election.
Francesca 洪已清楚表明她對其選舉的立場。

延伸例句
The politician clarified his stances on healthcare reform.
該政治家澄清了他對醫療改革改革的立場。

defunding /diːˈfʌn.dɪŋ/

· C1

意思：撤資、削減預算

解說：特指減少或取消對某個機構（如警察部門）的財政支持，常見於政治辯論。

影片原句
supported the idea of defunding the police.
支持了撤資的構想警察預算的想法。

延伸例句
The campaign focused on defunding the military budget.
該運動專注於削減軍事預算。

rhetoric /ˈret.ər.ɪk/

· C1

意思：修辭、言辭

解說：指說話的方式或風格，常帶有貶義，暗示言語華麗但缺乏實質內容或行動。

影片原句
rhetoric in that time is not rhetoric that we would use today.
當時的言論當然不是我們今天會使用的言論。

延伸例句
His speech was full of empty rhetoric.
他的演講充滿了空洞的修辭。

columnist /ˈkɒl.əm.ɪst/

· B2

意思：專欄作家

解說：在報紙或雜誌上定期撰寫專欄文章的作者。

影片原句
Joining us now is New York Post columnist Carol Marowitz in studio.
現在與我們連線的是紐約郵報專欄作家卡蘿·馬羅維茨在攝影棚。

延伸例句
The famous columnist shared her views on the economy.
這位著名的專欄作家分享了她在經濟方面的觀點。

communist /ˈkɒm.jə.nɪst/

· B2

意思：共產主義者

解說：指信奉或實踐共產主義理念的人。

影片原句
I think she's still the same communist she's been all along.
我認為她仍然是那個一直以來的共產主義者。

延伸例句
He was labeled a communist during the Cold War.
他在冷戰期間被標籤為共產主義者。

massage /ˈmæs.ɑːdʒ/

· C1

意思：修飾、潤飾（言論或事實）

解說：在此為比喻用法，指通過修改措辭來使某事聽起來更好或更具說服力，而非改變實質內容。

影片原句
They've just learn to massage it a
他們只是學會了去修飾它

延伸例句
The PR team tried to massage the negative news.
公關團隊試圖修飾負面新聞。

signal /ˈsɪɡ.nəl/

· B2

意思：訊號、信號

解說：指通過行為或言語傳達的隱含訊息。

影片原句
Do you think this is a signal that she's about to sell out the DSA
你認為這是一個訊號，表示她正即將把DSA賣光

延伸例句
The drop in sales is a signal of economic trouble.
銷售下降是經濟困境的信號。

flat out /ˈflæt aʊt/

· C1

意思：完全地、直截了當地

解說：用於強調動作的徹底性，常與 lying 或 working 搭配。

影片原句
or is she just flat out lying and
還是她根本就是在說謊

延伸例句
He was flat out refusing to answer the question.
他完全拒絕回答這個問題。

higher office /ˈhaɪ.ər ˈɒf.ɪs/

· C1

意思：更高職位、高官

解說：指政治體系中權力更大的職位。

影片原句
I think she's looking for higher office,
我認為她在尋求更高的職位，

延伸例句
Many politicians seek higher office after serving in local government.
許多政治家在地方任職後尋求更高職位。

moderating /ˈmɒd.ər.eɪ.tɪŋ/

· C1

意思：溫和化、緩和

解說：指使言論或態度變得較不極端或較易接受。

影片原句
You could see her moderating the way she speaks,
你可以看到她調整她的談吐方式，

延伸例句
He is moderating his tone to avoid conflict.
他正在緩和他的語氣以避免衝突。

enraging /ɪnˈreɪ.dʒɪŋ/

· C1

意思：令人憤怒的

解說：引起強烈憤怒情緒的。

影片原句
really enraging if you stop and think
如果你停下來想想

延伸例句
The unfair treatment was enraging to the employees.
不公平的待遇讓員工們感到憤怒。

spouting /ˈspaʊ.tɪŋ/

· C1

意思：滔滔不絕地說、噴出

解說：指不加思考地大量說出某種言論，常帶有貶義。

影片原句
what that rhetoric from Crazy Woke One that she was spouting at the time.
那個瘋狂的「覺醒者」所說出的瘋狂左派一號的那番話

延伸例句
He was spouting nonsense about the economy.
他滔滔不絕地說著關於經濟的胡言亂語。

damaging /ˈdæm.ɪ.dʒɪŋ/

· B2

意思：有害的、造成損害的

解說：對某人或某事造成負面影響或傷害。

影片原句
damaging to people.
對人們造成傷害。

延伸例句
Smoking is damaging to your health.
吸煙對你的健康有害。

forefront /ˈfɔːr.fʌnt/

· C1

意思：最前線、前沿

解說：指某個運動、趨勢或活動的最前線或領先位置。

影片原句
She was at the forefront of that.
她站在最前線。

延伸例句
The country is at the forefront of technological innovation.
該國處於技術創新的前沿。

insanity /ɪnˈsæn.ɪ.ti/

· C1

意思：瘋狂、精神錯亂

解說：在此為比喻用法，指極度不合理或瘋狂的狀態。

影片原句
trans insanity, that's at her feet.
那些陷入跨性別狂熱的孩子，都要歸咎於她。

延伸例句
The decision was pure insanity.
這個決定純粹是瘋狂。

smelled power /smeld ˈpaʊ.ər/

· C1

意思：嗅到權力、察覺權力

解說：比喻某人察覺到獲得權力的機會。

影片原句
She's smelled power and she
她嗅到了權力，她

延伸例句
Politicians often smell power when a scandal breaks.
當醜聞爆發時，政治家們經常察覺到權力。

go the distance /ɡəʊ ðə ˈdɪs.təns/

· C1

意思：堅持到底、全力以赴

解說：指堅持完成某事，通常指在競爭或挑戰中堅持到最後。

影片原句
thinks she's going to go the distance
認為她會堅持到底，

延伸例句
If you want to go the distance, you need to train hard.
如果你想堅持到底，你需要刻苦訓練。

句型解說（含實例）

eyeing [something]

意思：瞄準、覬覦某事物

接續：Subject + eyeing + Object

解說：用於描述某人正注視或積極爭取某個目標，通常帶有野心或競爭意味。

影片原句
So, the DSA is eyeing another win today.
所以，DSA 今天正瞄準另一場勝利。

實例

The rival team is eyeing the championship title.
對手球隊正瞄準錦標賽冠軍頭銜。
Investors are eyeing the new market opportunities.
投資者正覬覦新的市場機會。

backing [someone/something]

意思：支持某人或某事

接續：Subject + backing + Object

解說：表示在政治、商業或社會議題上給予某人或某項主張支持。

影片原句
but AOC isn't backing Francesca Hong.
但 AOC 並不支持 Francesca 洪。

實例

The community is backing the new park project.
社區正在支持新的公園項目。
He is backing his brother's business venture.
他正在支持他兄弟的商業冒險。

made clear [something]

意思：清楚表明、明確表示

接續：Subject + made clear + Object (clause/noun)

解說：用於強調某人明確表達了某種立場或事實，不留歧義。

影片原句
Francesca Hong has made clear her present stances to her election.
Francesca 洪已清楚表明她對其選舉的立場。

實例

The manager made clear his expectations for the team.
經理清楚表明了團隊的期望。
She made clear that she would not accept the offer.
她明確表示她不會接受這個提議。

moved away from [something]

意思：遠離、改變立場於

接續：Subject + moved away from + Object

解說：指某人改變了之前的觀點或立場，不再堅持原有的想法。

影片原句
she's moved away from a lot of
她已遠離許多

實例

The company has moved away from traditional marketing.
該公司已遠離傳統營銷方式。
He moved away from his initial plan due to budget constraints.
由於預算限制，他遠離了最初的計劃。

sending a signal that [clause]

意思：發送訊號表示...

接續：Subject + sending a signal that + Clause

解說：指通過行為或言語傳達某種隱含的訊息或意圖。

影片原句
Do you think this is a signal that she's about to sell out the DSA
你認為這是一個訊號，表示她正即將把DSA賣光

實例

The CEO is sending a signal that layoffs are coming.
執行長正在發送訊號表示裁員即將到來。
Her silence is sending a signal of disapproval.
她的沉默正在發送訊號表示不贊同。

look for higher office

意思：尋求更高職位

接續：Subject + look for higher office

解說：指政治人物尋求權力更大的職位，通常暗示動機是權力而非理念。

影片原句
I think she's looking for higher office,
我認為她在尋求更高的職位，

實例

Many senators look for higher office after their term ends.
許多參議員在任期結束後尋求更高職位。
He decided to look for higher office in the national government.
他決定在國家政府中尋求更高職位。

go the distance

意思：堅持到底、全力以赴

接續：Subject + go the distance

解說：指堅持完成某事，通常指在競爭或挑戰中堅持到最後。

影片原句
thinks she's going to go the distance
認為她會堅持到底，

實例

If you want to go the distance, you need to train hard.
如果你想堅持到底，你需要刻苦訓練。
She went the distance to finish the marathon.
她堅持到底完成了馬拉松。

at the forefront of [something]

意思：處於...的最前線

接續：Subject + be + at the forefront of + Noun

解說：指在某個運動、趨勢或領域中處於領先或最活躍的位置。

影片原句
She was at the forefront of that.
她站在最前線。

實例

The university is at the forefront of medical research.
該大學處於醫學研究的最前線。
He is at the forefront of the environmental movement.
他處於環境運動的最前線。